Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LSK lobes for a Daily Driver?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2007, 07:50 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
MVDCGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LSK lobes for a Daily Driver?

How are these for a DD LS1? How hard are they on the valve train? Those of you who have the on your car, how many miles do you have on them and the valve springs? Will I have to change springs every 10-15K? Thanks,
Old 07-31-2007, 07:54 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They are pretty hard on springs due to the high lift and fast ramp. You will need dual springs and they will have to be checked for seat pressure every 10-15k and replaced if needed.
Old 07-31-2007, 08:00 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
MVDCGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not a problem. I was expecting that. IMO its worth it as these lobes put some nice numbers down.
Old 07-31-2007, 09:13 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
MVDCGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone else?
Old 07-31-2007, 09:49 PM
  #5  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

I'd go with the XE-R. They make plenty of power and are less of a pain to deal with for a hydraulic cammed car (valve float and solid-roller type maintenance).

I think the LSK fad is more or less over with. People love the MS4 still because it does perform, but most customer grinders are not really pushing the LSK lobes like they were. After getting some miles on them, people saw they really could FUBAR a valvetrain and there wasn't enough of a gain to warrant the excess maintenance costs.

Even now with the amazing head flow and very powerful mid-lift flow numbers of the TFS heads and LS7/L92 stuff, people are going to relatively mild lobes that are on par or softer than the XE-R with great success.
Old 08-01-2007, 04:20 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
MVDCGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No more opinions?
Old 08-01-2007, 05:10 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Asmodeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I DD mine, it's got maybe 2k on it.. when it starts to valve float, I'll change them.. but I believe that Texas Speed was running them with dual springs and getting 30k+ out of them with no problems.

Let me put it this way.. I have not yet seen a post on this site that has said "I have to change my dual springs because my LSK lobes are too agressive".
Old 08-01-2007, 05:16 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
mudflap1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Asmodeus
Let me put it this way.. I have not yet seen a post on this site that has said "I have to change my dual springs because my LSK lobes are too agressive".
But I have seen a post in which a guy broke a dual spring with somekind of cam with LSK lobes (I can't remember which cam, I think MS4), I think that there was only like 3k miles on them too. Was the due to the LSK lobe? I can't say, maybe it was a defective spring? I decided against LSK lobes personally for my build.
Old 08-01-2007, 05:37 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Asmodeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mudflap1989
But I have seen a post in which a guy broke a dual spring with somekind of cam with LSK lobes (I can't remember which cam, I think MS4), I think that there was only like 3k miles on them too. Was the due to the LSK lobe? I can't say, maybe it was a defective spring? I decided against LSK lobes personally for my build.
Oh I'm sure things like that have happened! But it could have been a lot of different reasons, and it certainly isn't commonplace. I mean it could be as simple he could have gotten into it before the springs came up to temperature.. driver error and blaming parts..

LSK lobes certainly aren't for everyone, but they do pull more rwhp by a few ponies simply because they hold the valve open longer past .200 than an XE-R lobe of the same duration.
Old 08-01-2007, 06:57 PM
  #10  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

The LSK lobes demand that you pay closer attention to setting spring heights correctly (which typically involves shimming the spring to a certain clearance before coil bind), running a good quality spring (like an AFR 8019, Patriot Extreme dual, Comp 921 or the upcoming Comp 928 beehive), and running the proper plunger depth for your hydraulic lifters. If you sweat the details, the payoff in there...more power under the curve. For the 1 percenters out there, it's worth it.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 08-01-2007, 09:16 PM
  #11  
bsf
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
bsf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
The LSK lobes demand that you pay closer attention to setting spring heights correctly (which typically involves shimming the spring to a certain clearance before coil bind), running a good quality spring (like an AFR 8019, Patriot Extreme dual, Comp 921 or the upcoming Comp 928 beehive), and running the proper plunger depth for your hydraulic lifters. If you sweat the details, the payoff in there...more power under the curve. For the 1 percenters out there, it's worth it.


I think that sums it up. I personally am not a 1%'er, so I went with XER's based on Patrick's advice.
Old 08-01-2007, 10:30 PM
  #12  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
98RedZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

1%'er here, no problems yet, LSK intake lobe, Patriot Extreme Duals.
Old 08-02-2007, 09:50 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
5.3LJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Napoleonville, LA
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by mudflap1989
But I have seen a post in which a guy broke a dual spring with somekind of cam with LSK lobes (I can't remember which cam, I think MS4), I think that there was only like 3k miles on them too. Was the due to the LSK lobe? I can't say, maybe it was a defective spring? I decided against LSK lobes personally for my build.
I saw that post also. It was an MS4 cam, but the guy was using patriot duals when he should have been using extreme duals. I'm sure it was due to running a spring that was not designed to handle the lift that caused the failure.
Old 08-02-2007, 09:56 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Personally I cant justify daily driving a LSK. I think reliability takes a bigger hit than what you gain in power. Expect to check the springs at 10 - 15K miles, and then check every 3 to 5K after that.
Old 08-02-2007, 10:46 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I think the argument should be: Match the components well and LSK will work with no issues.

LSK acts like a crutch on most heads simply because very few GM castings can flow anything beyond .650 lifts.
Soooooo, run the proper springs, proper lifters and enjoy some kick *** below curve power.
I like low 23x duration LSK lobes, they have worked for me at the track.
Old 08-02-2007, 12:01 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Asmodeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 5.3LJimmy
I saw that post also. It was an MS4 cam, but the guy was using patriot duals when he should have been using extreme duals. I'm sure it was due to running a spring that was not designed to handle the lift that caused the failure.
The standard patriot duals can handle the lift of an LSK lobe.. the extreme's just have more seat pressure and are assumed to last longer with those lobes. They both handle the same lift.
Old 08-02-2007, 12:04 PM
  #17  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
bigwillie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am by no means a 1%'er. For the last 6 months, I've been daily driving a 227/227 LSK from TR in my 2000 SS Vert. Stock heads, A4. I got it for under the curve power to push the heavy Vert. Not too bad on peak power either. In my A4 with a loose converter, it put down 380 rwhp with a Fast 90 setup. TR guys said I'd be 10 or 15 down with a regular TR224. I don't have much to compare it to b/c this is my first cam. But for daily driving, its been fine.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.