2006 GTO A4 Dyno - Mustang Dyno?
#1
2006 GTO A4 Dyno - Mustang Dyno?
Question for you guys...what do you think a Mustang Dyno result would look like?? Supposively results are from a dynojet... but something is fishy...
My friend just dynoed and ended up with 293rwhp and 306rwtrq (SAE)...
From what Ive seen he is missing about 30 from each.... thoughts??
My friend just dynoed and ended up with 293rwhp and 306rwtrq (SAE)...
From what Ive seen he is missing about 30 from each.... thoughts??
Last edited by S8ER95Z; 08-08-2007 at 04:41 PM.
#3
Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
Question for you guys...what do you think a Mustang Dyno result would look like?? Supposively results are from a dynojet... but something is fishy...
My friend just dynoed and ended up with 293rwhp and 306rwtrq (SAE)...
From what Ive seen he is missing about 30 from each.... thoughts??
My friend just dynoed and ended up with 293rwhp and 306rwtrq (SAE)...
From what Ive seen he is missing about 30 from each.... thoughts??
#4
TECH Resident
Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
Question for you guys...what do you think a Mustang Dyno result would look like?? Supposively results are from a dynojet... but something is fishy...
My friend just dynoed and ended up with 293rwhp and 306rwtrq (SAE)...
From what Ive seen he is missing about 30 from each.... thoughts??
My friend just dynoed and ended up with 293rwhp and 306rwtrq (SAE)...
From what Ive seen he is missing about 30 from each.... thoughts??
#5
Looks like it was on a Dynomite (which Ive seen AKA Mustang Dyno)...
Funny thing..today he got a tune (from a handheld tuner) and suddenly put down 361rwhp... Seem Fishy to you guys? Does me...
BTW...I realize the whole anti-mustang dyno / anti-dynojet thing is out there but It doesnt really matter which one is 'more accurate' if 90% of the people use one over the other does it? Mustang Dyno results might be accurate but damn near worthless for comparing to other peoples results. I do realize that dynos are a tool and comparing results is worthless between two different dynojets let alone mustang vs dynojet... but at least if you compare two dynojet numbers you can tell if your car is screwed up when its 30rwhp less than everyone else you know?
Sorry for long post..just wanted to prevent the nut jumping that happens on here. Thanks
Funny thing..today he got a tune (from a handheld tuner) and suddenly put down 361rwhp... Seem Fishy to you guys? Does me...
BTW...I realize the whole anti-mustang dyno / anti-dynojet thing is out there but It doesnt really matter which one is 'more accurate' if 90% of the people use one over the other does it? Mustang Dyno results might be accurate but damn near worthless for comparing to other peoples results. I do realize that dynos are a tool and comparing results is worthless between two different dynojets let alone mustang vs dynojet... but at least if you compare two dynojet numbers you can tell if your car is screwed up when its 30rwhp less than everyone else you know?
Sorry for long post..just wanted to prevent the nut jumping that happens on here. Thanks
#6
Sold The Fun Stuff :(
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dynojet = dyno queen numbers to flash around on the internet and brag about how much bigger your e-dick is than the next guy
Mustang Dyno = superior tuning tool as its more of a real world load based dyno that is closer to actually driving on the road
Personally I try to get all tuning done on a Mustang dyno, then get Dynojet numbers just to know what it makes so I know if I'm on par
Mustang Dyno = superior tuning tool as its more of a real world load based dyno that is closer to actually driving on the road
Personally I try to get all tuning done on a Mustang dyno, then get Dynojet numbers just to know what it makes so I know if I'm on par