Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

bearing clearances too tight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2007, 06:51 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
sroka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: metro St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default bearing clearances too tight?

I just measured and my main and rod bearing clearances.
Results where
mains
#1 .0015
#2 .0015
#3 .0020
#4 .0017
#5 .0017

Rods
#1 .0015
#2 .0018
#3 .0015
#4 .0015
#5 .0018
#6 .0015
#7 .0018
#8 .0017

Question is how much do you think the main clearances will open up with heat at operating temp? Also i think the rod bearings need another .0005 on the crank to be polished.
Who else thinks the clearances are too tight?
Old 08-24-2007, 07:49 PM
  #2  
Teching In
 
zebradz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: pekin, il
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

rod clearences look good the #3 main looks a little high to me
Old 08-25-2007, 06:37 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
sroka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: metro St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Really? I thought the #3 was the only main with enough clearance.
I'm thinking the rods are all too tight? Anyone else with any opinions?
Old 08-25-2007, 07:37 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
rpmauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as stated by the factory service manual for a 1998 ls1 the connecting rod bearing clearance should be 0.015-0.076mm, so the rods look good The mains if geater than 0.00212" need to be undersized, according to the manual
Old 08-25-2007, 07:51 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
sroka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: metro St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rpmauto
as stated by the factory service manual for a 1998 ls1 the connecting rod bearing clearance should be 0.015-0.076mm, so the rods look good The mains if geater than 0.00212" need to be undersized, according to the manual
Those are factory specs, and i believe thats why you hear about so many people spinning bearings once they start to rev in the higher rpms with those larger cams.
Is tighter (like factory) specs better or looser? I know i've spun bearings in the past cuz of too tight of clearances but that was with old skool SBC.
Old 08-25-2007, 07:59 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
rpmauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it depends what you are looking to do with the engine. If you want to get long life out of it build it to spec. When i build a race engine i build it looser. looser wont last as long though. High rpms dont cause a bearing to spin unless it is way way to tight. too much clearance and wear will cause a bearing to spin. My .02
Old 08-25-2007, 09:46 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
sroka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: metro St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm building a 6.2L(376)
stock rods
stock crank
stock pistons
MS3
ported 243 ls6 heads
11.8-1 compression
carbed Vic Jr. (might be swapping to performer RPM)
mighty demon 750
1 7/8 headers w/ dual 3in exhaust
looking to drive the truck some but not everyday.
limit rpm around 6700 or so.
Nothing fancy just something that is reliable.
Old 08-26-2007, 03:15 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
sroka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: metro St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Anyone else?????
Old 08-26-2007, 03:43 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Looks good to me! Here were mine for my 427...

Main #1: .0016
Main #2: .0017
Main #3: .0018
Main #4: .0018
Main #5: .0018
Rods: .0018

Aluminum block motors built reliably for the street like tighter clearances. Drag iron blocks like looser clearances. You will be fine and you will have some good oil pressure also.
Old 08-26-2007, 04:13 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
sroka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: metro St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ferocity02
Looks good to me! Here were mine for my 427...

Main #1: .0016
Main #2: .0017
Main #3: .0018
Main #4: .0018
Main #5: .0018
Rods: .0018

Aluminum block motors built reliably for the street like tighter clearances. Drag iron blocks like looser clearances. You will be fine and you will have some good oil pressure also.
So yours is doing fine at those clearance? How high oil pressure are you seeing? Oil pump? oil weight?
How high do you spin the motor and how many miles do you have on it with those specs?
Sorry so many ?s just wanted a few opinions before i finish bolting this all together.
TIA
Sroka
Old 08-26-2007, 04:21 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ive always pretty much stayed at .0025", some like tighter than that some like looser than that.
Old 08-26-2007, 06:46 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
sroka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: metro St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Looks like i'm getting answers anywhere from .0018 to .0025?
Does anyone really think it matters if they are exact? Isnt like someone could measure bearing clearances when the motor is up to temp and running. Kinda souds like its the luck of the draw.
Old 08-26-2007, 06:57 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sroka
So yours is doing fine at those clearance? How high oil pressure are you seeing? Oil pump? oil weight?
How high do you spin the motor and how many miles do you have on it with those specs?
Sorry so many ?s just wanted a few opinions before i finish bolting this all together.
TIA
Sroka
Well i dont have the car anymore, but I put almost 2k miles on it and then tore it down and the bearings and journals were perfect. I ran a ported LS6 pump with 10w-40 and oil pressure was 50 at idle and 70-80 wot warm. I spun it up to 7000rpm.
Old 08-26-2007, 07:13 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

High side on a race engine is .0035", not to be considered for a street engine of course.
Old 08-27-2007, 05:25 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
sroka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: metro St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ferocity02
Well i dont have the car anymore, but I put almost 2k miles on it and then tore it down and the bearings and journals were perfect. I ran a ported LS6 pump with 10w-40 and oil pressure was 50 at idle and 70-80 wot warm. I spun it up to 7000rpm.
Thanks for the info.
Old 08-27-2007, 05:39 PM
  #16  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Hotrod406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hamilton, MI
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The all look a thou tight to me. I've always run between 2 and 3 on my motors. Are Ls1s different than the old SBC? Factory specs for the SBC are similar to the clearances posted, but everyone runs more.
Old 08-27-2007, 07:35 PM
  #17  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
SLED28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You have to run more clearance, factory specs are just that.. Factory 300hp specs... Not 400 or 500, etc etc like we're all doing here. Get them over .002"...
Old 08-27-2007, 08:01 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
machinistone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Bay, CA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

.002" R / .0025" M

Make sure to get your line bore checked even if you have not upgraded to stud, I have seen those blocks settle in quite a bit, or the factory does a poor job - either way the line bore is not were it should be.
Old 08-27-2007, 08:20 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
sroka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: metro St.Louis Mo.
Posts: 155
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

My gut feeling was telling me .002 mains and .0025 rod. How come tighter on the rods then the mains?
Old 08-27-2007, 08:50 PM
  #20  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
SLED28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Smaller journals require less clearance... General rule, .001 per 1" of journal... 2.100 rods, should be roughly .0021, and the mains at 2.559 should be roughly .0025"...



Quick Reply: bearing clearances too tight?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 PM.