LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Kooks or Pacesetter LT's ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2007, 12:39 PM
  #1  
LT1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,619
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Kooks or Pacesetter LT's ?

i want to buy some LT's dont know if i should get Kooks or Pacesetter race. i would also like to know how long O2 extention to buy? this car isnt a daily driver. i would like to know everyones opinion.
Old 09-24-2007, 02:14 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
glocklimited9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT/NY
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

buy pacesetters, save your cash, when i did my 96 ta i used a 24" and a 12", the 24 was too long, id get 2 12"s
Old 09-24-2007, 02:16 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (15)
 
Frans96SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Castle Del.
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

i would say kooks.... alot nicer and easier to install b/c you dont need to take off the steering.... they will also out last the pacesetters being stainless steel....
Old 09-24-2007, 02:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Pacesetters all the way. Nice for the money!! Taking the steering knuckle loose is a 5 minute job no big deal. I used 24" extensions and just tied them up nicely.
Old 09-24-2007, 04:14 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
blackz6sp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you got the money go Kooks
Old 09-24-2007, 04:19 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
ThoR294's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

link here:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/lt1-lt4-modifications/776189-kooks-lt-y-pipe-vs-pacesetter-lt-y-pipe.html

i already posted about this. ha

ive come to the determination, if its a heavily modded car... then go kooks, if its just a mild street car, go pacesetter.

Im going pacesetter, and save a grand for other mods
Old 09-24-2007, 04:20 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Haverhill, Mass
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

kooks = better quality and longer lasting but more expensive (twice the price)

Pacesetters = nice if they are coated, but wont last as long, but also half the price of kooks

kooks = $800 - $900

Pacesetters = $400
Old 09-24-2007, 04:21 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
ThoR294's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by CamaroRacing12
kooks = better quality and longer lasting but more expensive (twice the price)

Pacesetters = nice if they are coated, but wont last as long, but also half the price of kooks

kooks = $800 - $900

Pacesetters = $400
yeah, ive been told to get the pacesetters jethot coated *shrug*
Old 09-24-2007, 05:52 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
nighthawk15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 749
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Not to hijack, but wasn't there also some little company on here developing a set of stainless headers for the LT1 that cost about what Pacesetters do? Ive seen the LS1 pieces and they look awesome from the pics. Something to think about maybe. Last I heard they're supposed to be available in the near future. Just thought I'd throw that out there.
Old 09-24-2007, 06:21 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
transamws6_97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

why are you even comparing kooks and pacesetters
Old 09-24-2007, 09:39 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
glocklimited9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT/NY
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

id be interested in a back to back dyno of the 2....
Old 09-24-2007, 09:51 PM
  #12  
LT1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,619
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

thanks everyone for the input. I'm planning to go threw the engine and make 500+ hp in the future. dont know if i should get pacesetter and end up needing a better LT like Kooks or stick with pacesetter. Money is always a issue, but if i need Kooks then thats what ill get. just wanted to know what everyone thought, before making a big purchase.

Originally Posted by transamws6_97
why are you even comparing kooks and pacesetters
not comparing it in anyway, just wondering what everyones opinion on purchasing either product.
Old 09-24-2007, 10:22 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
 
98_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SAn jose/half moon bay
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

GET kooks..better quality. You Get what you pay for
Old 09-24-2007, 11:29 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
Pntbll309's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well if you have the cash why not go for the higher end product? Im sure Pacesetters will hold their own, but the Kooks will make a bit more power. Also look into which will stand up to future mods.
Old 09-25-2007, 12:16 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
3pnt4maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

pacesetters ???..mine came with the extensions and i bought the y pipe too
Old 09-25-2007, 11:48 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
1bdbrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,930
Received 46 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

In this case more expensive is not always better..I have yet to see a single thread showing gains of before and after going from standard headers to pacesetters. The difference in gains between cars is more than likely the condition of the engine, the dyno or the weather.

Personally I say not to waste your money on the kooks. You will never feel the difference in power that they *MIGHT* generate. The only thing you will get is a longer life but if you take care of the pacesetters they should last a long time as well.
Old 09-26-2007, 12:26 AM
  #17  
Staging Lane
 
98_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SAn jose/half moon bay
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pntbll309
Well if you have the cash why not go for the higher end product? Im sure Pacesetters will hold their own, but the Kooks will make a bit more power. Also look into which will stand up to future mods.
yup thats true
Old 09-26-2007, 05:43 PM
  #18  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
97blackz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

they will perform almost the same the difference here is the build materials and fitment. I have heard some people have a few fitment issues with the pacesetters and I have also heard the coating is not real good.Like someone mentioned keep a look out for the company on here developing a affordable high quality stainless header. that seems as it may be the best of both worlds there.
Old 09-26-2007, 06:58 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
Rowdy94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would imagine the power differences would be very slight. I have never seen a back to back dyno comparo though. You're basically paying twice as much for the Kooks. These aren't torque converters, you don't HAVE to go with the expensive option to get lasting performance. You said the car isn't a daily, so it probably only sees god weather. I would do Pacesetters in you spot.



Quick Reply: Kooks or Pacesetter LT's ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.