Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Would I benefit from a fast 90/90 combo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2007, 03:40 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Daredevil_TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fort Lewis, WA.
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Would I benefit from a fast 90/90 combo?

I have sort of a mild heads and cam combo with a ported LS6 intake an Shaner S3 TB, and I see some of these guys on here getting really good gains with the Fast 90/90 combo but alot of them have some pretty healthy H/C setups-I have a measley LPE GT2-3 (207/220 .578 .588 118.5 ICL) and Tsp stg 1 ls6 heads-do you guys think i'd benefit that much over my ported LS6 and Shaner TB? thanx in advance
Old 12-19-2007, 03:55 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Z28/2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Your girl's back door giving her the long stroke while you're at work
Posts: 6,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I would stay with what you have
Old 12-19-2007, 04:37 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
99FormulaM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yea, save the dough for suspension or a rear end..
Old 12-19-2007, 04:43 PM
  #4  
no title here
iTrader: (8)
 
skyhighsami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,272
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

At what point should you really consider getting a FAST over the LS6
Old 12-19-2007, 04:51 PM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
shdybrady1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cumming, Ga
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have heard around the 480-500 mark
Old 12-19-2007, 09:00 PM
  #6  
no title here
iTrader: (8)
 
skyhighsami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,272
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

whp or crank
Old 12-19-2007, 10:31 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Daredevil_TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fort Lewis, WA.
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanx for all the insight guys, i appreciate it
Old 12-20-2007, 02:51 AM
  #8  
TECH Resident
 
njc.corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by skyhighsami
whp or crank
i would say crank- 480-500 rwhp would be pushing it in n/a with a ls6-

dont think i have ever seen a 480-500 na rwhp 5.7 with a ls6

i could be wrong-

anyone seen that>>>???
Old 12-20-2007, 05:07 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
99zman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i would like more info also, mods in sig i made 392 before the 12 bolt, I want to get some more from it but afr's are a far way off, so ill be on the stock heads, i have the ls6 intake and shaner ported tb also already on the car. would it be worth it, i was thinking about a vengance ported set up?
Old 12-20-2007, 05:54 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
JonCR96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

In my research of this issue, I found that any car making at least 400 rwhp will make 20 more rwhp when switching to a FAST90. There may be better things to spend you money on, but thats your call.

And for the record my LS6 CTSV made 372rwhp/363rwtq. With just a FAST 90 (unported), electric water pump, stock air box w/ K&N filter and Magnaflow catback.





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 AM.