Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

GTK 1000 vs GT4202 R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2007, 03:43 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
crashly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default GTK 1000 vs GT4202 R

Give me your opinion of the two turbo chargers..
Turbonetics GTK 1000 or Garrett GT4202R
gtk 1000 = 76mm comp wheel
gt4202R = 74.7mm comp wheel
both rated at 1000 horsepower
Will be used in twins, on sbc 358 cubes
drag race only.

page 17 of the garrett turbo chargers 2008 cataloge says...

"a clear demonstration of the inherent superority of the garrett ball bearing design is in the LAUNCH of a turbocharged drag race car. The TWO STEP rev limiters used to build boost on the line expose the turbo to the harshest imaginable conditions of the pressure spikes and scorching temperatures. Where lessor turbo's often fail catastrophically, garrett ball bearing turbo's regularly shrug off these brutal conditions time after time"

I could not find anywhere, turbonetics saying 2 step rev limiters would not hurt there turbo's...
BUT
Turbonetics give 12 months unlimited warrenty on there turbo's

which turbo's are better??

Last edited by crashly; 12-27-2007 at 04:01 AM.
Old 12-27-2007, 08:21 AM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Cheeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I came from the import world where we use 2 step and anti-lag on every launch, personally I always used the garrett turbos and never, ever had a problem with one
Old 12-27-2007, 10:07 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
crashly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

cool,
good input... anyone got more???
Old 12-27-2007, 11:21 AM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
Project Dc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bay area
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im personally diggin all the new borg warner stuff. same performance at a fraction of the cost! imma start carrying their line soon after i tried their S372 on my supra compared to a GT42R. bigger and makes identical spool time for 700$ less
Old 12-27-2007, 12:03 PM
  #5  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Right the bw stuff is awesome and the modded bw stuff is really starting to shine.
Old 12-27-2007, 04:59 PM
  #6  
Launching!
 
red beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lynchburg va
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by crashly
Give me your opinion of the two turbo chargers..
Turbonetics GTK 1000 or Garrett GT4202R
gtk 1000 = 76mm comp wheel
gt4202R = 74.7mm comp wheel
both rated at 1000 horsepower
Will be used in twins, on sbc 358 cubes
drag race only.
I'm running a gt4508r ball bearing and love it....I believe you get what you pay for, so alittle more cash now and less later....good luck with your build...
Old 12-27-2007, 08:54 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
crashly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

so other than the $$$$$...
the turbonetics stuff is ok ???

I had a problem with the gtk 550's , turbonetics could not do enough to help me.... they just bent over backwards to fix the problem.
Great people to deal with.

Have twin gtk 1000's on my 358 sbc..
Just checking that i bought the right ones, VS garrett GT's

cheers
ash
Old 12-27-2007, 11:33 PM
  #8  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

TC76's would have done the same thing as the GTK's. A little cheaper as well, and still great turbonetics warranty.
Old 12-28-2007, 12:26 AM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
crashly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
TC76's would have done the same thing as the GTK's. A little cheaper as well, and still great turbonetics warranty.
thanks for replies.

looking @ your web site...
http://www.forcedinductions.com/productturbonetics.htm
the tc series t76 advertise @ 1000 hp
the t series t76 advertise 1100 hp.... more than the gtk's ????
the super t 76 advertise 1200 hp....

i thought the gtk 1000, ( 76mm comp wheel), with all its super surge ported comp housing would have been better??? , but it's rated at 1000 hp

http://www.forcedinductions.com/productturbonetics.htm

are these gtk's under rated??? because they are new??

there is a turbonetics video, with a supera , they pulled a gtk 76mm off, and fitted a super t 76.... went 956 rwhp @ 35 psi

http://www.turboneticsownersclub.com...908&highlight=

is there a major difference from the gtk's to super T's
both have surge ported comp housings, SAME comp wheel

cheers

ash

Last edited by crashly; 12-28-2007 at 12:36 AM.
Old 12-28-2007, 01:27 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

i have heard of some of the Evo guys, well one, having problems with his BW turbos. blew 3 on his race car after only a few dyno pulls. he was pushing over 50lbs of boost though.

by the way these were not modded turbos but just normal BW stuff.

thanks Chris.
Old 12-28-2007, 08:11 AM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
crashly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

cool ideas/ info
keep it coming
Old 12-28-2007, 09:01 AM
  #12  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuntington101
i have heard of some of the Evo guys, well one, having problems with his BW turbos. blew 3 on his race car after only a few dyno pulls. he was pushing over 50lbs of boost though.

by the way these were not modded turbos but just normal BW stuff.

thanks Chris.
Those were Bullseye Borg warner turbos. 3 of them blew up back to back to back . They couldn't fix the problem so he called us.....USP is now running just fine after he told us what was happening.
Old 12-28-2007, 09:04 AM
  #13  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by crashly
thanks for replies.

looking @ your web site...
http://www.forcedinductions.com/productturbonetics.htm
the tc series t76 advertise @ 1000 hp
the t series t76 advertise 1100 hp.... more than the gtk's ????
the super t 76 advertise 1200 hp....

i thought the gtk 1000, ( 76mm comp wheel), with all its super surge ported comp housing would have been better??? , but it's rated at 1000 hp

http://www.forcedinductions.com/productturbonetics.htm

are these gtk's under rated??? because they are new??

there is a turbonetics video, with a supera , they pulled a gtk 76mm off, and fitted a super t 76.... went 956 rwhp @ 35 psi

http://www.turboneticsownersclub.com...908&highlight=

is there a major difference from the gtk's to super T's
both have surge ported comp housings, SAME comp wheel

cheers

ash
We can build the TC's the same as the GTK's now without the pretty ported cover though....but you don't need a surge housing on a big v8, plus surge housings decrease power by a few % anyhow.


We can build the Super T's as well now.....but we can do them NON-BB where you can only buy them BB direct from T-netics. That will be offered after the new year. Also their is more to a super T then just the pretty belled cover.
Old 12-28-2007, 12:07 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

I have a pair of GTK-550's sitting here...

The drilled housing on that unit is purely Cosmetic. the drillings are dead ends. Still looks good though

Not sure how many actually have functional drillings.
Old 12-28-2007, 01:11 PM
  #15  
TECH Regular
 
ChrisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
Those were Bullseye Borg warner turbos. 3 of them blew up back to back to back . They couldn't fix the problem so he called us.....USP is now running just fine after he told us what was happening.
What was the problem?
Old 12-28-2007, 01:30 PM
  #16  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
JZ 97 SS 1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChrisUlrich
What was the problem?
Links to the car are below...plus all the info you will want.


http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthread.php?t=314315


http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthread.php?t=310133
Old 12-28-2007, 02:13 PM
  #17  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
TrakDay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by crashly
gt4202R = 74.7mm comp wheel
Im running 2 of these on my built 408/ET 240cc setup. Should be done in Feb! I will let you know how she does!
Old 12-28-2007, 06:27 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
frcefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
We can build the TC's the same as the GTK's now without the pretty ported cover though....but you don't need a surge housing on a big v8, plus surge housings decrease power by a few % anyhow.


We can build the Super T's as well now.....but we can do them NON-BB where you can only buy them BB direct from T-netics. That will be offered after the new year. Also their is more to a super T then just the pretty belled cover.
hmmmm whats the benefit for having the TC upgraded to the GTK specs and price for an upgrade for those of us that have one.

Tell us more about your Super T
Old 12-30-2007, 10:33 AM
  #19  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If you already have the TC unit with MPS, not sure it would be worth an upgrade to the F-1 turbine wheel. Now we can build the TC's with 3" DP's and now 4" DP's as well.


As for the Super T's shoot us a PM. We can do them with BB, non BB, water cooled, , bell inlets, billet comp wheel in some apps....etc..etc. Endless amount of different configs.
Old 12-31-2007, 01:21 AM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
crashly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Quote:
the t series t76 advertise 1100 hp.... more than the gtk's ????
the super t 76 advertise 1200 hp....

i thought the gtk 1000, ( 76mm comp wheel), with all its super surge ported comp housing would have been better??? , but it's rated at 1000 hp
Dr turbo...
Whats the main difference between the super t 76 and gtk 1000, Other than gtk front cover, and surge slot belt mouth on Super t??
do they have same comp and turbo wheels?
thanks

ash


Quick Reply: GTK 1000 vs GT4202 R



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM.