Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers
View Poll Results: Which Engine & Tranny
440 LS7 w/ITB & Built T56
4
30.77%
402/427 w/Kenne Bell 2.8L & Built 4L80E
9
69.23%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

Engine Setup Choice????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2008, 09:51 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
GrnDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Engine Setup Choice????

I know this isn't the perfect forum to post this in, but I cannot decide between two engine choices for my 95 TA. My 93 TA is more then likely sold so I have quite a bit of disposable income to drop on the engine for my car...


Now this car is mainly a street/show car, but I want to be able to race it if the mood strikes. I cannot run a rim smaller than 19" because of the size of my brakes, so it will never be a serious racer (drag tires). The engine choice will also carry a differing tranny choice with it.

Option 1) 600 RWHP
-440ci LS7 with PRC CNC ported heads 11.5-12 to 1 CR
-Wicked Cam
-Using the New Kinsler Cross Ram ITB Intake
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...431&highlight=
-Built T56 6-speed tranny

Option 2) 800+ RWHP
-402 or 427ci with PRC CNC ported heads 9-9.5 to 1 CR
-Blower Cam
-Kenne Bell 2.8L blower with 8 rib setup running about 15psi
-Built full manual shift 4L80E

Option 2 is about 2-3K more, but a lot more HP
I am truly torn between the two...
Old 01-19-2008, 01:27 AM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
calongo_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

better reconsider things if you think option 2 is 2-3 k more. It's going to be more of difference than that.
Old 01-19-2008, 02:02 AM
  #3  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

LOL at the results! What did you expect in the FI section?

That N/A intake is sure pimp though. 700/600rwhp eek!
Old 01-19-2008, 02:39 AM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
corvetteandsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lincoln, DE
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

anything with a kenne bell on a LSx motor is just plan nasty Kenne all the way
Old 01-19-2008, 03:17 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Mr.MartyStone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Screwston, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't know if you're going to be able to fit a kenne bell on that thing. I would go TT if you're looking for the showcar aspect.
Old 01-19-2008, 04:08 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
My2kz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Go with the KB setup...get ya some M/T et drags in 345's and you will sort of hook up...
Old 01-20-2008, 01:05 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
GrnDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by calongo_SS
better reconsider things if you think option 2 is 2-3 k more. It's going to be more of difference than that.
Just for the engines it is about $2.5k difference in price, mainly coming from the difference in blocks. For the N/A I would use a LS7 block, with the KB it would most likely be the Warhawk. I have done A LOT of price researching to find out all the costs involved, and I have a very complete excel spreadsheet of each engine build. The KB Warhawk 427 is $22k for EVERYTHING (Headers, 8-rib accessory drive, 2.8L KB unit, injectors, coils, EVERYTHING).

The Kinsler 440 has all the same parts but $1,500 less on the block and $1000 less for the intake setup.
Old 01-20-2008, 01:19 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
lmt0705's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: buffalo NY
Posts: 1,706
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

having a big hp supercharged combo is my vote, it also will draw more attention to your car when your at the show, Im kind of biased though seeing as FI is my usual hangout.
Old 01-20-2008, 02:05 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Websy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Damn thats a hard choice, both would be sweet. I told myself if I ever do another build after my current one, in sig, that I'd go with a crazy N/A setup. Its hard to beat FI but what you listed would be bad *** too. With both you'll be roasting of whatever tires you have. I agree on a nice custom twin turbo setup, especially for a show car. That would be really bad ***. If money was no option I definetly go warhawk with all the best and some bad *** twin turbo's
Old 02-08-2008, 10:05 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
 
njc.corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I really like the n/a set-up more due to the fact of the carbon/fibre intake-it looks like a wild peice of gear

my 2 cents-

also why supercharge and not turbo-even though theirs nothing wrong with blowers-just want to know-

Thanks

Nick--
Old 02-09-2008, 09:35 AM
  #11  
Launching!
 
gallardo259's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 262
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

if u can get the kinsler intake, n/a gets my vote!!
Old 02-09-2008, 10:29 AM
  #12  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (65)
 
Superman09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 7,234
Received 59 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

either will be nasty, but if you can have the work done to try and fit the KB on an f-body i say that would be the way to go! KB's sound absolutely incredible at WOT
__________________

Featuring 6 different turbo kits for your F-body!
Check us out on Facebook at: www.facebook.com/HuronSpeed



Quick Reply: Engine Setup Choice????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.