What cam with PP stage II (59cc) heads
#1
What cam with PP stage II (59cc) heads
I have the PP Stage II heads on my car with the comp 224/224 .581 .581 114lsa cam already in it. I want to go a little bigger and am hoping for something like 450+ to the wheels.
I also have kooks LT's moser 12 with 3:73's ls6 intake, lid, and cutout.
any info would be helpful. any suggestions on custom grinds would be helpful
I also have kooks LT's moser 12 with 3:73's ls6 intake, lid, and cutout.
any info would be helpful. any suggestions on custom grinds would be helpful
#2
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the PP Stage II heads on my car with the comp 224/224 .581 .581 114lsa cam already in it. I want to go a little bigger and am hoping for something like 450+ to the wheels.
I also have kooks LT's moser 12 with 3:73's ls6 intake, lid, and cutout.
any info would be helpful. any suggestions on custom grinds would be helpful
I also have kooks LT's moser 12 with 3:73's ls6 intake, lid, and cutout.
any info would be helpful. any suggestions on custom grinds would be helpful
#3
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sparks,NV
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is the car on the stock bottom end? cause if so you cant run an ms3 with those heads believe me Ive got the same heads and had to sell the ms3 cause I would have had ptv issues. I ended up using a trick flow stg 3 camshaft. 228/230 .585/.585 on a 112lsa.
#4
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hanover, MD
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my experience with those heads, I'd stick to the smaller duration cam and add a FAST 90 or wait to see how the Weiand does.
I found that they lack low-mid lift flow when compared to my current AFR's and this resulted in poor low end, IMO, with my G5x2. Pull up top doesn't seem to be that much greater with the AFR's, but low and mid-range are much improved.
I'd recommend using a smaller cam with those heads and try to find more speed elsewhere w/o giving up power under the curve.
I found that they lack low-mid lift flow when compared to my current AFR's and this resulted in poor low end, IMO, with my G5x2. Pull up top doesn't seem to be that much greater with the AFR's, but low and mid-range are much improved.
I'd recommend using a smaller cam with those heads and try to find more speed elsewhere w/o giving up power under the curve.
#5
just fly-cut, one of the many things you have to think about when you set-up to a big cam.....
Trending Topics
#9
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Wit the clearance issues your going to have with milled heads & bigger valves I'd look to something like the torquer 3. We've seen it engine dyno within 7hp of the MS4 with much better p/v. What does the car make currently? You should see about 18-22hp more from swapping out the 224 camshaft...
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a TSP 233/239 with those exact Patriot heads and DID NOT flycut.
They are the older style Patriot heads that are not milled so PTV wasn't an issue.
No dyno #'s yet, I'm gathering funds for a clutch.
They are the older style Patriot heads that are not milled so PTV wasn't an issue.
No dyno #'s yet, I'm gathering funds for a clutch.