SLP later or Pacesetter now?
01-27-2008, 02:26 PM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: bonham, tx
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLP later or Pacesetter now? Well i was going to order my pacesetter LT's this week then i saw the link to the new slp lt's, i dont think there for sale yet...heres the link in case you havent seen it.. https://ls1tech.com/forums/new-products-showcase/850701-new-slp-long-tube-header-system-camaro-firebird-98-02-a.html ...my question is do u guys think it would be worth it to wait for those or just go ahead and get the pacesetters?
. I wonder when the expected release date is. 
Trending Topics
01-27-2008, 04:03 PM
#8
Most 1 3/4 headers are going to be very very compareable and the benefits of the most expensive over the cheaper, IMO, are miniscule. I had Pacesetters on both cars and the both made great power for the setups and the cars. The first car made 400/380 on a 98 Stalled A4 with a 224/224 .563/.563 112 and 241's w/a pulley and LS6 intake. The new car makes 431/382 with a 238/242 .605/.610 113, extremely well hand ported LS6 heads, no pulley, and the stock LS6 intake all though a stalled A4 with 17x12 wheels in the back. When it comes to LT's, at least 1 3/4, they are all very close.
01-28-2008, 10:33 AM
#12
Most 1 3/4 headers are going to be very very compareable and the benefits of the most expensive over the cheaper, IMO, are miniscule. I had Pacesetters on both cars and the both made great power for the setups and the cars. The first car made 400/380 on a 98 Stalled A4 with a 224/224 .563/.563 112 and 241's w/a pulley and LS6 intake. The new car makes 431/382 with a 238/242 .605/.610 113, extremely well hand ported LS6 heads, no pulley, and the stock LS6 intake all though a stalled A4 with 17x12 wheels in the back. When it comes to LT's, at least 1 3/4, they are all very close.
I have QTP's, but that's because I got a good deal on them used. Otherwise, the cheaper the better as far as I'm concerned.
