Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mustang vs. Dynojet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2003, 01:09 AM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Onyx Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston/College Station, TX
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Mustang vs. Dynojet

What are the differences and why do they dyno differently?

Ryan
Old 07-10-2003, 05:44 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
WILWAXU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 14,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

ttt
Old 07-10-2003, 09:10 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
BurnOut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas-freakin'-Texas
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

I read an article lately, and IIRC, the gist of it was that the Mustang dyno has a provisionable parameter to take into account rolling/aerodynamic drag. That is to say that the Mustang drags the brakes on the rollers according to what the variable is set to. I think.

Anyhoo, the article had a car dyno'd on a DynoJet, a Mustang, and they had an optical 5th wheel as well... they found that actual 50-70 times (as measured by the 5th wheel) were MUCH closer on the Mustang dyno than on the DynoJet. Additionally, IIRC, a DynoJet simulates something like a 2450 pound load (the weight of the drum??); so if your car weighed 2450 pounds, your acceleration times while rolling would be approximately the same as on a DynoJet or a Mustang dyno. I think.
Old 07-16-2003, 01:19 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Ed Blown Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

But if you gain say 10% on a Mustang dyno, would it be 10% on a DynoJet??
Old 07-16-2003, 01:37 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
v8maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Commerce, MI
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

not if the drag on the mustang is dynamic or exponential.
Or
the gain on the car is exponential and not linear
-Steve
Old 07-16-2003, 01:59 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
Crazyquik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nawf Carolina
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

Mustang is better for tuning as the load is programable depending on the type of car.

So you could dyno a 4000 lbs truck and then a 2200 lbs car, and get a better tune as the dyno could be optimized for each.

J.
Old 07-17-2003, 03:32 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
smokin' joe 00 ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MI
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

On the same car you can see as much as a 30 to 50 rwhp difference from the mustang dyno to a dynojet. The Mustang dyno will give you real world #'s.
Old 07-17-2003, 09:19 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
promod1955's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

a mustang dyno is an eddy current dyno. a dynojet is an inertia dyno. most eddy currents dyno lower. besides mustangs are always down on power...
Old 07-18-2003, 09:52 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
smokin' joe 00 ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MI
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

besides mustangs are always down on power...
lol,

Old 07-18-2003, 12:42 PM
  #10  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

My numbers are mustang figures.
Old 07-18-2003, 03:17 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
smokin' joe 00 ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MI
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

My numbers are mustang figures.

Where did you get that dynoed at, those are the best C1 cam and no head LS1 #'s with 4.10 gears and a 12 bolt on a Mustang dyno on the face of the planet. Most stage 2 heads & cam cars on a Mustang dyno come in between 360 & 390 rwhp. Congrats on the great #'s what kind of 1/4 mile times do you turn?
Old 07-18-2003, 05:36 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
critter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

a mustang dyno is an eddy current dyno. a dynojet is an inertia dyno.
Pardon my ignorance. I know about eddy current and water brake dynos, but what is an inertia dyno? I sounds like the resistance to the power (or more properly torque) is the inertia of a large drum rather than an electrical or water brake.
Old 07-18-2003, 07:03 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Argon Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Michigan, auburn HIlls
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

i researched it and i found that it was somthing like 11 percent less then a dynojet.

Check my sig. Mustang dyno numbers, yet i am pulling alot of mph in the quarter.

A general rule
e.t. is a function of traction
mph is a function of hp
Old 07-18-2003, 09:00 PM
  #14  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: Mustang vs. Dynojet

My numbers are mustang figures.

Where did you get that dynoed at, those are the best C1 cam and no head LS1 #'s with 4.10 gears and a 12 bolt on a Mustang dyno on the face of the planet. Most stage 2 heads & cam cars on a Mustang dyno come in between 360 & 390 rwhp. Congrats on the great #'s what kind of 1/4 mile times do you turn?

I wish I had a 12 bolt! 1/4 mile times suck major, major *** (I've only run 2 passes w/ this setup), as I spin the stock Goodyears F1's 'till deep into 3rd gear! That said, my only traction gear is 4th. Even then I trap @ 111. Er, eh, cough cough, 13.0 w/ 2.2 Nittos anyone?
Ain't got no traction baby!!!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.