Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

248/248 .590/.590 106???

Old 02-09-2008, 11:02 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
jkwalkercchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: morristown/newport,tn
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 248/248 .590/.590 106???

is this close to being drivable??or tunable???


248/248 .590/.590 106
its a daytona prototype cam and the internals are gonna be callies 3.185 crank with 1.888 rod journals 6.500 lentz rods with a 3.905 bore
it equals a 5.0
i will also have stage 3 243 heads
port matched proffesional products intake
with a 90mm ported and polished throttle body

maybe i he told me the specs wrong but 106 lsa isnt that alot
Old 02-09-2008, 11:09 PM
  #2  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Dennis93TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

damn, that will be one sick sounding idle
Old 02-09-2008, 11:13 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
jkwalkercchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: morristown/newport,tn
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yea its solid roller to

im basically running dayton prototype internals so i think that can will go well with the set up


and yea itll sound so dam mean idleing
Old 02-10-2008, 01:29 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
5.3LJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Napoleonville, LA
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

36 degrees of overlap in a 5.0L? A honda civic will have more torque than that thing. You'll need to run 12.5:1 compression for that cam to perform like it should, which will be hard to achieve unless you use dome pistons. It will be a real bitch to tune and it won't be close to drivable
Old 02-10-2008, 10:52 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
redtail2426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester,Ny
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

that will not be driveably at all,and reducing cubic inches is not a good idea either.If you plan on turning 9k+ and have some really steep gears you may have a nice track car but it will def not be a street cruiser
Old 02-10-2008, 10:54 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
jkwalkercchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: morristown/newport,tn
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well i got the internals for cheap so i said why not try it

yea i figured the cam wouldnt
Old 02-10-2008, 11:53 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Its a solid roller, so after lash it will basically be a 238/238 106.
Old 02-10-2008, 11:54 AM
  #8  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

36* of overlap @.050, man your tuners gonna love you. Good luck with her man.
Old 02-10-2008, 12:32 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
jkwalkercchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: morristown/newport,tn
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

lol i dont know if im gonna use it but it sure would be fun

i wish i could find out what rockers and heads they use on the daytonas prototype cars
Old 02-10-2008, 12:55 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Jessel Mohawks rockers for sure, and I believe LS6 heads, and truck intakes, but don't quote me on the heads and intake.
Old 02-10-2008, 01:05 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
jkwalkercchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: morristown/newport,tn
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i think they might be ls6 intakes heavily modified by wilson

i know a member on her has one he said he called wilson and they said they had about 1500$ worth of work done to them idk???
Old 02-10-2008, 01:52 PM
  #12  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jkwalkercchs
i think they might be ls6 intakes heavily modified by wilson

i know a member on her has one he said he called wilson and they said they had about 1500$ worth of work done to them idk???
I bet it was cut apart, and expoxied back together for that price.
Old 02-10-2008, 01:58 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
jkwalkercchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: morristown/newport,tn
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yea it had extensive work to it from what i recall
Old 02-10-2008, 09:44 PM
  #14  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
mochiles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 135
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I too have heard it was the "big ugly" truck manifold.
Old 02-10-2008, 09:45 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
jkwalkercchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: morristown/newport,tn
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

truck manifolds are not big and ugly

there just proportionally challenged


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.