Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

PRC 5.3 TR224 Results....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2008, 09:04 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Parrothead497's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default PRC 5.3 TR224 Results....

So I finally had my car dyno'd after 4 months of waiting after my H/C swap. I have a 98 6-speed with PRC 2.5 5.3's and a TR224 on a 114 LSA, LS6 intake, ported TB, 42lb injectors, and all supporting bolt-ons. Also have a TSP catted-Y with Pacesetter LT's and a dual dual catback. I did a best of 395/375 after 9 pulls. I was hoping for a little more but guess I can't be disappointed. Does this sound about right???? Any ideas where I could gain some more power? I was thinking maybe cutouts??

Thanks for your input.
Old 05-03-2008, 09:09 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (22)
 
LS1 SPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Schaumburg,IL
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no dyno queen, but doesn't seem far off to me with the mods


stock rearend?

stock gear?

if you are looking for a bit more power remove the cats, get a cutout & I'm sure you would see 10-20 rwhp
Old 05-03-2008, 09:14 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Parrothead497's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, stock rear and stock gearing. Any ideas on what I would gain with a ported fast 90/90?
Old 05-03-2008, 09:22 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Full-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate of SC
Posts: 3,069
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I would think it would be higher with heads. Every dyno is different but one car that I tuned put down 388 cam only with 4.10's and 18" wheels with the 224 cam.

You need a good tune.
Old 05-04-2008, 07:53 AM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (22)
 
LS1 SPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Schaumburg,IL
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yes..all dyno's differ and that's why I didn't say it is too low

We have had a few on our dyno here and there that are 20-30 lower then norm with a particular combo, but they run as good if not better then the higher dyno cars at times.

did you pre-dyno the car? We try to do this a lot more now since some just start lower, but the gains are all the same at the end of the day.

I would say maybe 10ish with a 90/90 with this milder combo.

get it to the track and see how it does
Old 05-04-2008, 10:50 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ryan02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Anna, VA/ Fairmont, WV
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your setup is very close to mine. I have 4 year old Patriot 5.3's and I would think the PRC 5.3's would blow them out of the water. Numbers are in sig...
Old 05-04-2008, 12:34 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (51)
 
30th t/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 3,095
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I would figure 415-430rwhp with those mods. So yea Id say its low. If it were me, I would compare it to another dyno just to see how it compares.
Old 05-04-2008, 07:00 PM
  #8  
Banned
iTrader: (22)
 
LS1 SPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Schaumburg,IL
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 30th t/a
I would figure 415-430rwhp with those mods. So yea Id say its low. If it were me, I would compare it to another dyno just to see how it compares.

good suggestion on the dyno
Old 05-04-2008, 07:15 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
cookba's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

try putting on a 85mm MAF and see what that will gain. 2004 Z06 MAF or a SLP MAF
Old 05-05-2008, 11:35 AM
  #10  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

With cats & through the exhaust it's still a little bit lower than I would guess. What compression did you set it up with? You might consider putting a cut out on it just to see where she's at with a good exhaust.

What kind of air fuel & timing did she have?
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 05-05-2008, 12:26 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
99ccz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: butler, pa
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That definitely seems low. I have pretty much the exact setup as you only in an A4 and I made 380 with a bad transmission.
Old 05-05-2008, 01:09 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Every dyno is different like was said above. I would not be too concerned as you are in the ball park of where you should be.
Old 05-05-2008, 01:13 PM
  #13  
Launching!
 
regblkss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did same hp with a a4 on a dynojet. very sim mods to. seems low to me.
Old 05-05-2008, 06:01 PM
  #14  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Parrothead497's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea,

I felt it was a little low myself. Im not too concerned, but Im not going to lie I wanted to break 400. Im not sure where the AF ratio was but I do know the timing was at 27.
Old 05-05-2008, 06:14 PM
  #15  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
davered00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Plainfield, CT
Posts: 10,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Berore #'s would be good to know. They do seem low. I did 38X rwhp/370rwtq with the TR224 & bolt on's. 430rwhp/403rwtq after the AFR 205's.
Old 05-05-2008, 06:17 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (118)
 
snake charmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The south
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

my cam is a a 224 / 228 114 with 243s and a fast 90 ported also byme and i just did 439rwhp . check link in sig for the dyno chart . i would say you would gain 15-20 with a fast 90 .
Old 05-13-2008, 11:03 AM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
SpeedWorld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very low #'s. I just dyno'd my cam only SS. TR224 and full bolt on, stock ls6 intake...car made 390hp/380tq. With those heads I would expect to be around 425rwhp/395tq.
Old 05-14-2008, 08:57 PM
  #18  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Parrothead497's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im going to take the car to get dyno'd again. This time ill take off the 19 inch c6's with runflats and run the car cool. The 395 was after 9 runs on the dyno, so I think I might have lost some power with the heat. I'll keep everyone posted on the new numbers
Old 05-14-2008, 09:25 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
firefighter813x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Good luck bro. Look at it this way, at least you already have a nice set of heads. If you ever swap out to a bigger cam you've got the hard part done. Like everyone has said, it does seem low. How does it drive? Have you considered another tuner?
Old 09-08-2008, 03:10 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
 
SladeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It could be that the dyno is running low numbers too,

I've been on different dyno's and my lowest is 364HP/362ft/lb

On another dyno was is 372HP 370ft/lb.

And just after the cam install and tuned are the numbers in the sig.


Quick Reply: PRC 5.3 TR224 Results....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.