Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

Ever install a C6 IRS on a 02 Camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2008, 09:49 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
will01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Ever install a C6 IRS on a 02 Camaro?

Performing some research on various suspension setups for unrestricted road racing. Looking to see if anyone has installed a c6 irs on a 02 f-body.

I know I can keep the stock set-up and get some decent handling, but the research seems to indicate IRS yields better results. Forgot to mention, my wife really likes the camaro so upgrading to a vette is out of the question…

Does this sound right or did I hit my head too hard while I was under the car yesterday? LOL

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks
Old 05-09-2008, 10:20 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Black02SLPSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Here is a link to someone who put a c4 irs under an fbody. https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ght=f-body+IRS I believe a c5 and c6 setup would be out of the question without some serious fab work due to the transmission sitting in the rear of the car rather than bolted to the engine. However where there is a will theres a way and i hope you have the cash to pay, because it would be really expensive and time consuming working all the bugs out imo.
Old 05-09-2008, 11:15 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
will01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks again, great reading and seems like a lot of time spent building and tuning.
Old 05-10-2008, 12:47 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (23)
 
Killer_Bluebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Olmsted, OH
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah by the time you are done you should have just bough the corvette.
Old 05-10-2008, 12:53 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
LT1-DAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are quite a few guys that road race with a solid rear, and have great results.
Old 05-10-2008, 01:32 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
zlover129's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea, the C4 IRS doesn't require a tube rear...the C5 and C6 transaxles will
Old 05-10-2008, 11:35 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah I can imagine that would be pretty tough as the corvette has the transmission in the rear and actually has that special driveshaft thing between the engine and the transmission
Old 05-10-2008, 03:02 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
will01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you for the input - so in your opinion, what would it take to make the live axle set-up handle like a c6 z06? Is it possible?
Old 05-10-2008, 03:12 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,803
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by will01
Thank you for the input - so in your opinion, what would it take to make the live axle set-up handle like a c6 z06? Is it possible?
Get the car to weight 3000lbs, and have 50/50 weight distribution. Possibly a cage for stiffening the chassis properly, and definitly some major suspension work. Sticky tires, and don't forget brakes....
A used Z06 would be cheaper...
You can start with this and go from there:
http://www.stranoparts.com/partdetai...ID=0&ModelID=7
Ill tell this though, you won't be disappointed with the handling after this kit...
Old 05-10-2008, 03:28 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
will01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks - I totally agree with the corvette angle; but I am a married man and my wife and i have had huge fights over swapping the 4th gen for a vette (it is an 02 convert and can seat her and my daughter, which is the basis for her arguement). So getting the corvette is out of the question for now. But the good news is she likes it when i modify the car!

Great recommendation for Sam's products - I though they worked well but did not know it was capable making that much of a difference.

Seems like the live axle may not be such an anchor afterall. Thanks again!
Old 05-10-2008, 03:38 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Black02SLPSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Nah its really not as bad as you think. I have his HP4 package and i havnt been able to find the outer limit yet. I did get it to slide once but i think that was due to the crappy tires i have on it rather than hitting the limit of the suspension. In fact i would almost say that you could probably go toe to toe with a stock c5. But being that i have never driven one kinda makes that a bold statement.
Old 05-10-2008, 03:42 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,803
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by will01
Thanks - I totally agree with the corvette angle; but I am a married man and my wife and i have had huge fights over swapping the 4th gen for a vette (it is an 02 convert and can seat her and my daughter, which is the basis for her arguement). So getting the corvette is out of the question for now. But the good news is she likes it when i modify the car!

You need to get control of that wife of yours!
haha jk jk...
You could also consider a CTS-V, those are plain out sick and handle on rails!

You just gotta take into consideration all the engineering that has gone into the C6 Z06 compared to our cars. Aerodynamics, chassis layout, lightweight wishbone suspension, etc etc. It would take a lot to get the same feel and control you get from that kind of layout.

Great recommendation for Sam's products - I though they worked well but did not know it was capable making that much of a difference.

Seems like the live axle may not be such an anchor afterall. Thanks again!
Yes, there is a huge difference. As Im sure you've read the biggest problem is the stock shocks, changing those for something like Konis is a major difference in itself.
Old 05-11-2008, 02:35 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Foxxtron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brisbane, QLD, AUS
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by will01
...
Seems like the live axle may not be such an anchor afterall. Thanks again!
Actually, it's more of a "anchor aweigh" than a "properly stowed anchor", but all silly analogies aside, the biggest penalty with the live axle on the F-body is the fact that it's a lot of unsprung weight (hence my slightly inaccurate anchor analogy), and that unsprung weight can combine with poorly valved dampers (shocks) for really messy handling and bad ride comfort. Don't get me wrong, I definitely like a properly designed IRS, however there are many IRS's that use expensive designs and still don't perform much better than some live axle designs.

It's interesting that the IRS endeavour has been explored many times with the 4th Gen F-body, but most of the solutions are costly and still don't address the real problems with the 4th Gen handling and comfort, which brings this statement right back to the most effective improvement that these cars need, good dampers.

Good dampers are the place to start with if it's concerning handling in this car. The next step would be swaybars, then maybe springs if you need so. Like the previous posters have mentioned, these areas are great places to start. I don't remember what LCA's you have in the rear, but if you plan to keep the stock ones for the moment, then you'll need some new "solid rubber" bushings for them. Also, if you opt to lower the car, you'll need to consider a new PHB with at least one rod-end in it.

If you plan to get into some sort of unlimited class, then you might want to take a peek at this website: www.frrax.com. There's also been some discussion about extensive modifications on there (many of these for the serious competitor in mind).
Old 05-11-2008, 09:15 AM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
will01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Excellent, just joined Frrax yesterday! Will search the threads to find the extensive mods they have discussed.

Thanks again for your input!!
Old 05-11-2008, 11:21 AM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
You could also consider a CTS-V, those are plain out sick and handle on rails!
That CTS-V is way too heavy to outhandle even the fbody. When the car is 500+ lbs over the fbody then it kinda ruins the whole great feel and suspension thing.

Overall your going to have a pretty hard time to match the handling of a c5, c6, or even a c4 no matter what you do. Don't sweat it though. The fbody in stock form has a lot of potential for improvement in suspension as most know. But on an autox course, the vette is just at a different level than an fbody. The vette is SS competitive which is basically the highest of stock classes while the fbody is good in FS. Quite a big handicap difference applies.
Old 05-11-2008, 02:03 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
 
dailydriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bucks County, Pa.
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

+ million to all of the above suggestions, and I'll add;

Get a Torsen T2R diff (IF you still can??) or an Auburn 'Racer's Diff'.
With the above suspension recommendations, sticky tires, good brakes you'll be that much closer to a Vette in the handling dept. (well a stock C5 at least).
Old 05-11-2008, 05:09 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,803
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z28bryan
That CTS-V is way too heavy to outhandle even the fbody. When the car is 500+ lbs over the fbody then it kinda ruins the whole great feel and suspension thing.
Have you ever driven a CTS-V?
Stock for stock that would leave an fbody in the dust (although thats not really saying much...) And I'd have to drive one again (drove it before I had any suspension mods) but I think it would be a good race between a Koni/strano swaybars fbody and a stock CTS-V in the corners. Those things have ridiculously good balance and composure.

Overall your going to have a pretty hard time to match the handling of a c5, c6, or even a c4 no matter what you do. Don't sweat it though. The fbody in stock form has a lot of potential for improvement in suspension as most know. But on an autox course, the vette is just at a different level than an fbody. The vette is SS competitive which is basically the highest of stock classes while the fbody is good in FS. Quite a big handicap difference applies.
Im not trying calling you out on either of these quotes, so please don't take offense but have you driven a C4?
My buddies dad has a '92 (im pretty sure its a base model, not a Z51) and my car currently out handles it, thats for sure. You can feel that the C4 is lighter, but the suspension actually feels kinda sloppy, and "relaxed" in comparison to my setup. I'm sure a Z51 model would be a different story though...
Old 05-11-2008, 08:05 PM
  #18  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Mojave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
Im not trying calling you out on either of these quotes, so please don't take offense but have you driven a C4?
My buddies dad has a '92 (im pretty sure its a base model, not a Z51) and my car currently out handles it, thats for sure. You can feel that the C4 is lighter, but the suspension actually feels kinda sloppy, and "relaxed" in comparison to my setup. I'm sure a Z51 model would be a different story though...
Sounds like your dad's C4 isn't well setup. My C4 handles significantly better than my LS1 f-body, and I'm still running OE springs (Z51 springs). The C4 has better front and rear geometry, better weight distribution, and lower overall weight. C4's have won numerous SS (when they were in SS) and AS (current class) national championships. A C4 IS faster around an AX course (in fact, AS is faster than ESP by just a bit, ie: a stock C4 is faster than an ESP prepped f-body). http://www.scca-chicago.com/solo/indexes/rtp2008.html


Back on topic, though, I really don't see the point of swapping IRS into an f-body. The stock rear suspension isn't bad, and it can be made to work better.
Old 05-11-2008, 08:37 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,803
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mojave
Sounds like your dad's C4 isn't well setup.
*friends dad. Like I said, its stock, non-Z51 suspension.
My C4 handles significantly better than my LS1 f-body, and I'm still running OE springs (Z51 springs). The C4 has better front and rear geometry, better weight distribution, and lower overall weight. C4's have won numerous SS (when they were in SS) and AS (current class) national championships. A C4 IS faster around an AX course (in fact, AS is faster than ESP by just a bit, ie: a stock C4 is faster than an ESP prepped f-body). http://www.scca-chicago.com/solo/indexes/rtp2008.html
What is done to your fbody?
Old 05-11-2008, 08:53 PM
  #20  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Mojave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
What is done to your fbody?
It's an FS car, so Strano 35mm front bar and Konis, stock otherwise.

An ESP setup would handle better than the current setup, but I think we all knew that. My point was this: even in ESP trim, an AS C4 is STILL faster around an AX course (if just barely). I'm not saying a setup f-body can't handle, but I DO say that a C4 will handle better.


Quick Reply: Ever install a C6 IRS on a 02 Camaro?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM.