bob320fa

So, I know nothing about Dyno's. In fact this is my first itme in this section. I just wanted feedback on my results. Brian from PCMforless did my Tune. My mods are listed in my sig but, for these purposes it is essentially 2002 WS-6, 45,000 miles,PS headers, TSP/ Magnaflow catted Y, GMMG, K&N, MTI clearlid, P&P TB, started with factory tune. He was impressed by the numbers, especially the results before the tune. Since I'm just trying to learn the numbers side of this game what do you think?

02NBMWS6

iTrader: (22)

Youre right about where you should be, nothing bad, nothing amazing, strong torque though

trukk

iTrader: (1)

You might want to change your SIG. Your TQ number is a result of that huge spike at the beginning of the run. Looks more like approx 365-70 rwtq.

You are going to get a million PM's asking how you got 35 more tq than hp

2002 WS-6: HP: 354.8, Torque: 391.9

Still, awesome to have more TQ than HP. Must pull like a *****.

-Chris

Justin00SS

iTrader: (5)

I put down the same numbers pretty much. I haven't dynoed with the ud pulley yet. I think I'll wait though till the RRs are installed and the LS7 clutch. I still need to change my tranny oil and rear end oil too.

I wanna see what I can get on stock cam/heads.

Mike@ZMS

iTrader: (10)

Those numbers are STD not SAE.. SAE is what most of us around here are used to. STD will show higher power output than SAE. I would call the Dyno shop where you did your pulls and find out if they can give you the SAE numbers, then it would be a more fair comparason for what 95% of us measure are cars at.

Justin00SS

iTrader: (5)

oh yeah. I did not notice that. haha

ramairjohn2000

iTrader: (3)

umm what is the difference?

Justin00SS

iTrader: (5)

Its makes all things equal. So a car STD #s will be different for each area due to weather.

SAE makes a baseline and the numbers will be very close no matter if you are in Denver or Miami.

venom ws7

iTrader: (13)

Great numbers even for STD.

But I agree with 391TQ is spike.

BrntWS6

iTrader: (7)

I've got the exact same mods as you and did 341.6hp and 355.0tq on a Mustang Dyno. Don't know the numbers compare with a Dynojet though.

Ryan L

Yeah, fix your sig please. You don't want to confuse anybody.

bob320fa

Okay. I didn't realize there were two sets of numbers. I'll call to see what it looks like SAE. I'll also change the sig. It does seem to pull like hell. Irregardless of the actual numbers, I wish I had done the exhaust when I got the car in '05. It feels so much better, and the sound is awesome. I just wish I could lower the sewing machine tick.

01bird58

iTrader: (9)

Looks like some strong numbers even after they get adjusted.

trukk

iTrader: (1)

Don't sweat the numbers. It's all in how the car drives, and sound like you like it, which is what counts.

-Chris

2SlowTTop

I'd say you're right where you should be if you're an M6. The torque looks very impressive though.. Nice numbers none the less, but remember, every dyno is different and the numbers should be used as a tuning tool. Lets see some track times..

John02Hawk

iTrader: (4)

your mods are very similar to mine.. The numbers are solid.. The only thing is that whoever did that graph on the computer put your max #'s at the dyno spike which really isn't a number to go around bragging about.. See my dyno sheet in my sig for a better example.. -John

jebuzws6

iTrader: (5)

off subject but we go the same car...lol.. thats badass..oh and great numbers