View Poll Results: Auto or Manual? What are you running and why?
Auto-Street
40
36.36%
Auto-Track
15
13.64%
Manual-Street
51
46.36%
Manual-Track
4
3.64%
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll
Auto turbocharged vs. Manual turbocharged
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Auto turbocharged vs. Manual turbocharged
Just curious, out of all the FI members here, who is running a manual trans and who is running an auto? I'm going to make this a poll to find out how many of each. I would also like to hear why you think one is better over the other and what your car is primarily set up for. IE: Auto is better for the 1/4 mile because ??? and manual is better for street because ??? Thoughts and opinions?'
Maybe even talk about what converter or clutch you chose for your set up and why. Also post how it's working for you and any recommendations you might have.
Maybe even talk about what converter or clutch you chose for your set up and why. Also post how it's working for you and any recommendations you might have.
Last edited by Bird-Of-Prey; 07-15-2008 at 12:27 AM.
#2
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I think an auto with turbo makes the most sense. It will spool alot faster and stay spooled inbetween shifts. For a manual i think a sc makes more sense. Since it rpm dependent lag would not be a big issue.
#3
There is a million posts on this.....do a search....FyI auto is better for both cause of the way it loads the turbo and the ease of launching with it........but last week I was doing some from rolls against some turbo-nitrous busa's and I got the power shifting down mint "with the help of a few secret tricks" and walk by them in forth gear.....but the best part was is the turbo never really fell off and the nose never came down. So it's doable to go low nines and well into the eights with a stick, it's just more work and a little scarier, I need a SFI bellhousing, but the launching is some thing I still need to work on....
#4
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a million posts on this.....do a search....FyI auto is better for both cause of the way it loads the turbo and the ease of launching with it........but last week I was doing some from rolls against some turbo-nitrous busa's and I got the power shifting down mint "with the help of a few secret tricks" and walk by them in forth gear.....but the best part was is the turbo never really fell off and the nose never came down. So it's doable to go low nines and well into the eights with a stick, it's just more work and a little scarier, I need a SFI bellhousing, but the launching is some thing I still need to work on....
#6
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL.
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very interesting thread.
Here is what i have read (am in the process of planning my next stage of upgrades and have considered going FI).
Track-car is an auto for obvious reasons. They are more consistent, and allow you to use a trans break.
Street cars will be dependant on your rwhp goals and the size of your turbo/turbos. For a relatively mild FI setup (talking 500-650rwhp), a manual transmission is fine. The size turbo for that application will spool fast enough to were lag between shifts shouldn't hurt you too bad. When you start getting into bigger rwhp catagories (650-1000+rwhp) th400 (or maybe a 4l80) is the way to go. There is the exception of a twin turbo setup where the lag is not to bad, but it better be right or you will be waiting for boost (experiencing lag) between each shift, thus not maximizing your application.
This comes down to the honest question you have to ask yourself. Do you want
1) a street car that you take to the track for fun (not trying to get deep into the 9s)
or
2) a track car that sees occassional street duty but that is gunning for mid-low 9s (or even 8s).
Anyways, probably enough talk from the NA/N2O guy huh?
Here is what i have read (am in the process of planning my next stage of upgrades and have considered going FI).
Track-car is an auto for obvious reasons. They are more consistent, and allow you to use a trans break.
Street cars will be dependant on your rwhp goals and the size of your turbo/turbos. For a relatively mild FI setup (talking 500-650rwhp), a manual transmission is fine. The size turbo for that application will spool fast enough to were lag between shifts shouldn't hurt you too bad. When you start getting into bigger rwhp catagories (650-1000+rwhp) th400 (or maybe a 4l80) is the way to go. There is the exception of a twin turbo setup where the lag is not to bad, but it better be right or you will be waiting for boost (experiencing lag) between each shift, thus not maximizing your application.
This comes down to the honest question you have to ask yourself. Do you want
1) a street car that you take to the track for fun (not trying to get deep into the 9s)
or
2) a track car that sees occassional street duty but that is gunning for mid-low 9s (or even 8s).
Anyways, probably enough talk from the NA/N2O guy huh?
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(landonew) - Thanks for your input. Again I don't need schooling on this subject. Just looking for who runs what and why. Thought it might be informative for others.
#10
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montrose, MN.
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My gto was an m6. With the maggie it never hurt me but when I went to a plate kit with a 125 shot It cooked a centerforce d-f and then the spec-3 would get warm and slipp if I ripped 2nd or 3rd and hooked. I'm leanin towards an auto on my next toy. I'm torn between n2o,procharger or turbo.
#12
9 Second Club
Its entirely down to personal choice.
Performance cars in Europe all tend to be manual, old people's cars tend to be automatic
The US is obviously different, with the majority being automatic
For straight lines, there is no doubt auto will be faster....just depends what sort of driving experience you want from the car.
Performance cars in Europe all tend to be manual, old people's cars tend to be automatic
The US is obviously different, with the majority being automatic
For straight lines, there is no doubt auto will be faster....just depends what sort of driving experience you want from the car.
#13
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...highlight=auto
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...highlight=auto
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...highlight=auto
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...highlight=auto
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...highlight=auto
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...highlight=auto
#18
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
My speedo also doesn't work since my cross bar under the dash pushes on the console a bit
I also run a zr1 wheel in back for street duty so the revs aren't super low. With the 28" slick its a little better. 70 is pretty fast. I bet I usually cruise around 60 on the highway.
#20
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Burton, MI
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My car is a M6 and thats what i wanted, i just think its more fun to drive, i make decent power, i know an auto would make more sense. Im not lookin to be the fastest guy around town, i have fun driving my car, its still fast and thats what matters to me.