Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS1 Swap Headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2008, 10:04 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ten5nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockett, Montana
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default LS1 Swap Headers

I am installing a 5.3 into a 64 Nova with a Heidt's mustang ll front clip. Does anyone have any info on long tube headers for this swap? I know that Lemons has a set, but I'm not sure if I want to spend 1200 bucks!! Any info on cheaper headers would be appreciated. Thank you.
Old 07-24-2008, 04:48 AM
  #2  
Launching!
 
67pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Down along the strand in NJ
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You'd think, with this being a popular swap, somebody would be making them..........
Old 07-24-2008, 07:03 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (94)
 
Bad Chad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Huffman, Texas
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I hada 65 nova 3 years ago and I always wante to do a swap but money got tight and it had to go. Good luck with the build
Old 07-24-2008, 08:16 AM
  #4  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
PlayersZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NW of GTA, ON, Canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Could always build them. I just finished modifying a set of Hedman long-tubes to suit the 5.3 my son is putting in his 89 Camaro. Each side needed two tubes rerouted to suit the change in port spacing. Also the SBC flanges were cut off and new LSx flanges welded on. I also built a custom Y-pipe using J-bends.

There's a thread on another forum about the project but I don't know if I can post such links on here.
Old 07-24-2008, 08:35 AM
  #5  
Launching!
 
67pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Down along the strand in NJ
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I used the stock Camaro(actually T/A) exhaust manifolds. The drivers side fits just fine, the passenger side needed modifying as it ran into the firewall / subframe connection. The 99 manifolds are a double wall SS construction, to this I have attached the CC's, albeit they needed to be modified also.
Old 07-24-2008, 10:10 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
S10xGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Neches, TX
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Here's my solution. Not your car, but I doubt the Heidt's clip is any tighter than the steering shaft on my Rod & Custom front clip. My rails are 26 1/2" wide.

Russ
Old 07-24-2008, 10:19 AM
  #7  
Launching!
 
67pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Down along the strand in NJ
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In my case it's not really the tightness of the frame rails but where the A-arms are and the junction of the frame rails with the firewall. But I do commend you on your job
Attached Thumbnails LS1 Swap Headers-passenger-side_exhaust-manifold_a_8-07a.jpg  

Last edited by 67pete; 07-24-2008 at 10:25 AM.
Old 07-24-2008, 03:35 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
melsie68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 176
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have a '68 Camaro with a custom front end subframe which uses rack and pinion steering. The r&p seems to be more forgiving than the old saginaw gearbox so it seems to free up some room on the driver's side. I bought a set of the newer Dynatech swap headers for the 67-69 Camaro as soon as they went into production and they work great. They have plenty of allowance for the steering box and in my case the r&p shaft with joints. I can't imagine your front end is too much different so they may work for you also.
Attached Thumbnails LS1 Swap Headers-camaro-6-10-017.jpg  
Old 07-24-2008, 10:24 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
S10xGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Neches, TX
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 67pete
In my case it's not really the tightness of the frame rails but where the A-arms are and the junction of the frame rails with the firewall. But I do commend you on your job
Yesss, that could be a problem. Have you checked out S&P Performance? Try page 98...

Russ
Old 07-28-2008, 03:54 AM
  #10  
Launching!
 
67pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Down along the strand in NJ
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I believe that ten5nova was looking for long tubes, as are most of us. Headman and Hooker have had the short tubes(block hugger) for a while. S&P's are a step in the right direction...just not quite there yet(speaking for myself)!
Old 07-28-2008, 11:48 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
Jeff64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anyone tried these? http://www.ssheaders.com/muscle.htm

I was told #5207 fits tight to the block, and would work with most any front end with a R&P. I was also told I could try them for fit, and return them if they aren't damaged.

As I get closer to doing my swap, I'm going to give them a try on my stock frontend, converted to R&P.

-Jeff
Old 08-12-2008, 06:59 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (24)
 
joshluther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Casino, CT.
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jeff64
Has anyone tried these? http://www.ssheaders.com/muscle.htm

I was told #5207 fits tight to the block, and would work with most any front end with a R&P. I was also told I could try them for fit, and return them if they aren't damaged.

As I get closer to doing my swap, I'm going to give them a try on my stock frontend, converted to R&P.

-Jeff

Has anybody tried these or the s&p ?



Quick Reply: LS1 Swap Headers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.