Debating which header
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hemet
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Debating which header
Is there a difference in track times worth noting between the brands of headers? I was interested in going with the hooker super comp 1 7/8" or Texas Speed 1 7/8"which are both around 700 bucks with y pipe. I was looking at the ARH headers and you can see how much time and that they obviously have some pretty extensive r&d into them but they are about 1200 bucks with ory. I'm sure until I get a bigger ci engine it probably wont even see a difference between the headers since I'm not needing the flow as much as a bigger displacement engine would need but later when I do go bigger will it make that much of a difference in going with ARH compared to the hooker's or the texas speed's?
#3
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
any longtube header will be fine. they will all make close to the same amount of hp. some might be slightly more. just stay clear from the SLP longtube headers. they offer the worst ground clearance. im running pacesetter longtubes with an off road y pipe and im very satisfied with it.
Trending Topics
#10
+1 for ARH. I got a set when they were new on the market and hadn't become popular yet. Mine are the 1 3/4" variety. The built quality is as good as they come, they fit 100% perfectly, and the install couldn't be easier. I have serious OCD when it comes to parts on my cars and I haven't found a single reason to complain about these. Ground clearance even with the catted Y is very good. Yeah, they are a little pricey, but worth every penny. You won't regret buying the ARH.
#11
TECH Addict
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That was a big selling point for me (easy to install), plus I could have them configured any way I wanted them, and not having to weld in an WBO2 bung myself. All these factors are worth extra money to me. I should have mine in about 10 days.
#14
Thats a bit of an oxymoron "save your money and go with arh" lol. How bout save $1000 bucks and get the same performance within a few ponies with pacesetters.
#15
TECH Addict
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been down the coated, non-SS header road before, and everything is great when you first put 'em in, but as the years and miles roll on, you find yourself very disappointed looking in the engine bay and seeing flaked-off coating and rusty-*** headers. It's very disappointing when you try so hard to keep your engine bay looking good. And there's really nothing you can do short of replacing them. You can take 'em off and paint 'em which doesn't hold up, or take 'em off and recoat 'em, but they'll just flake-off and rust again. Very disappointing. JMO.
#16
TECH Addict
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#17
It all comes down to how much you like your car though when comparing Pacesetter to a better quality header, in my opinion. If you don't care about a coating that's not going to last and how your engine bay looks then there's no reason not to go with Pacesetter. But keep in mind, once that coating flakes off you're no longer insulating the heat of the headers from your engine bay.
Do what your budget allows, but keep those things in mind when deciding if it's really worth it to buy the $400 headers.
#18
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
i have had the pacesetters and i just recently took them out and put in some 1 7/8 ARH. the pacesetters fit in pretty well. they slid in and didn't hit anything when it was all said and done. the ARH's are a little tighter fitting but then again, they are larger headers too. the only reason i switched is because i wanted stainless. the pacesetters did rust and the car isn't a daily driver and has yet to see the rain since i owned it. however, with washing it and the heat, etc. they will rust a bit. i am sure the power differences are minimal. i wanted a good fit, a good y-pipe, and stainless so i went with ARH.
#19
TECH Addict
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to add, if I haven't already beaten the horse to death, is that I didn't mean that SS headers are the only option. I had my JBAs for many years and they served me well, and I'm sure that Pacesetters or something similar would too. On the other hand, I know that if in 2002 I had the option of buying ARHs with a catted y-pipe, I wouldn't be replacing headers now. I'd be all set. Just something to think about.
#20
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Hey I have the Pace headers from Maryland Speed which are JetHot coated inside and out. The fit and finish are great, I had them on in almost 2 hours.
Its been about 2 years now and they still look great!
My uncle on the other hand bought Stainless JBA headers for his 05 GT and this is what they look like in the same amount of time! And his is not a daily driver either. He called JBA and they said it is normal you just have to wipe them down or should have them coated! **** you try reaching the headers in a Mustang engine BAY!
Stainless headers.....
Its been about 2 years now and they still look great!
My uncle on the other hand bought Stainless JBA headers for his 05 GT and this is what they look like in the same amount of time! And his is not a daily driver either. He called JBA and they said it is normal you just have to wipe them down or should have them coated! **** you try reaching the headers in a Mustang engine BAY!
Stainless headers.....