Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

low dyno numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2008, 12:58 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
link138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nazareth, PA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default low dyno numbers?

I had my car dyno tuned last week in order to get the msot of my mods and get rid of any codes.

The car:
2000 t/a M6 with 51k on it. pacesetter LT's, SLP lid, TSP catted-Y,
SLP loudmouth II, eibach prokit

Car put down 339hp/323tq, now my tuner said that he tried to bring the torque curve in as early and keep it there.

Now this was on a mustang dyno, but my question is will a heavily worn clutch lower my TQ number?
Old 08-20-2008, 01:21 AM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
whitew01ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: westminster MD
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that is very respectable for almost full bolt ons. torqe could be a lil high but still not to shabby
Old 08-20-2008, 01:57 AM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
krazy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Thats not to bad.

Mustang dynos usually read about 10whp lower too.
Old 08-20-2008, 07:31 AM
  #4  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't really see anything wrong with those numbers. Got any track numbers on it?
Old 08-20-2008, 07:40 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Pretty typical numbers, even strong peak HP if the mustang dyno reads low. Maybe the peak TQ is a bit low for what I've seen but how does the curve look?
Old 08-20-2008, 10:00 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
link138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nazareth, PA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No track runs weak clutch soo i didnt want to abuse it even more.

Torque curve is awesome, above 3k and i have well over 300 ft/lbs torque
Old 08-23-2008, 06:27 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
addicted2fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yah definatly no issues with those number. BUT, what alot of people get warped about is numbers, NOT their times. Take to the track once you get it in working order. Numbers = nothing if you cant even run it..
Old 08-23-2008, 10:13 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
badazz99ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery, TX
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^true that brother. but all in all those numbers arent bad. especially if you take a gander at my sig. get that black beauty to the track and see what happens.
Old 08-25-2008, 04:37 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
link138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nazareth, PA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys, i feel a bit better about my numbers. I still feel as though witha new clutch i could have saw better numbers? oh well
Old 08-25-2008, 11:12 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
 
c5z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: bay area
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mine with full bult ons and an auto got 338hp and 355 torque, wierd how peoples cars can vary so much huh?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.