LT1-LT4 Modifications - Dyno results! Full bolt ons & TD's




zlicious94
08-30-2008, 06:55 PM
Well finally after two years and alot of ricer and ford kills later I got her on the rollers and boy she came through!! 346rwhp and 397 rwtq?
http://www.fquick.com/LT1freak


transamws6_97
08-30-2008, 07:04 PM
wow that is really good numbers for a bolt on lt1 there are cammed lt1's not even making that kind of power

jaysz2893
08-30-2008, 07:43 PM
man i got jsut a bout the same bolt ons but only a singel 3 inch borla. I was 303hp and 341tq before my lt's/ehaust and the TB with the ram air. I am hoping i am around 330 at the wheels soon.


AChotrod
08-30-2008, 07:46 PM
Sweet numbers!!!!!!!!

fireman
08-30-2008, 08:28 PM
Is anyone actually buying this?


No way that LT1 is making 364rwhp N/A with a stock cam and heads, no fuggin' way.

Blackbirdws6
08-30-2008, 08:30 PM
graph in the link says 346rwhp, not 364rwhp. Regardless I think you got a very generous dyno.

zlicious94
08-30-2008, 08:32 PM
Thanks for correcting him for me and maybe it is but thats what it said and I have beat some fast bolt on ls1 cars so??

blown03mustang
08-30-2008, 08:32 PM
either way very good numbers!!!!

robsquikz28
08-30-2008, 08:34 PM
im not buying this it dont sound right at all there are other cars out there not making that at all even with bolt on records with all the weight out of the vehicle and u do the power to weight ratio

sounds like crap my bro with a cam makes that much power a stock type cam and thats the power making. sounds like bull to me but u nevvveeerrrr know.

BOLO
08-30-2008, 08:50 PM
That's far fetched to me also. You're numbers are actually in the h/c horsepower category(364 rwhp). What are you trapping in the quarter? et's?

zlicious94
08-30-2008, 08:57 PM
My car is mostly a weekend warrior, I dont really track it............ stock rearend!!

j0n
08-30-2008, 09:32 PM
run on street tires and look at your mph...noone on this forum is going to buy that without track times to back it up.

Marc3.4V6
08-30-2008, 09:42 PM
I've seen people with full bolt ons that come close to me and while it makes me happy for them, it makes me mad that I'm not making more with my setup, albeit mild. Now this, if true, would make me very mad/jealous.

96lt1m6
08-30-2008, 09:53 PM
i dont want to start an argument,rather just want to voice my opinion!
i have many years with Lt1s and others and the numbers are rather high,my buddies STOCK 97SS LT4 did not even make that kind of power.....
the dyno may not have been set up properly,that is more like the culpret here........they can be manipulated!

we just had a dyno session today and one of our members Lt1 car pulled a 282rwhp 313rwtq he has PS longtubes,true duals,tune(chip)its a '93,A4 and a CAI

SoxXpupPeT
08-30-2008, 09:55 PM
thats very impressive

robsquikz28
08-30-2008, 10:03 PM
possible dyno or are u lying to us or are u hitting with spray and not sayin. hhmmmm.

Fixxer99TA
08-30-2008, 10:14 PM
Those numbers seem impossibly high, something was wrong there.

But as someone else stated, track times will tell.

snk-huntr
08-30-2008, 11:59 PM
Yeh those numbers are total b.s. that guys dyno needs to be burnt and took to the scrap yard. All I Can do is laugh. And hope you dont believe those numbers.

LS1Z28-00
08-31-2008, 12:27 AM
LMAO my H/C ls1 doesnt make that kind of TQ. there is an issue with the dyno or he has nitrous. a cam in a lt1 wouldnt make that big of tq spike vs hp i would think. sounds like a 50 shot to me.

Fixxer99TA
08-31-2008, 12:30 AM
Im surprised this thread made it past the 4 post mark without someone raising the bs flag...

transamws6_97
08-31-2008, 12:51 AM
i mean the torque seems way high but 346 rwhp...not that far fetched for a full bolton...i know ls1's with just exhaust can make that

-PEPE-
08-31-2008, 01:26 AM
Friggin awesome, congrats on the good #'s, long live the LT1s....starting to miss mine and regret selling it...but can't look back now though :eyes:

Elliott's94Z
08-31-2008, 03:44 AM
Is anyone actually buying this?


No way that LT1 is making 364rwhp N/A with a stock cam and heads, no fuggin' way.

I was there son..you don't believe it come out our way and get lit up :D

Elliott's94Z
08-31-2008, 03:49 AM
Yeh those numbers are total b.s. that guys dyno needs to be burnt and took to the scrap yard. All I Can do is laugh. And hope you dont believe those numbers.

:barf:

Actually he has a 300 shot, heads and cam and a Vortec Supercharger so I though the numbers were low...

wrd1972
08-31-2008, 07:43 AM
These numbers might be uncorrected for temp and humidity. If so that would explain why they are this high. This is far out of the range for bolt on LT1. Time slips will be required to stand on these numbers.

Blackbirdws6
08-31-2008, 07:48 AM
i mean the torque seems way high but 346 rwhp...not that far fetched for a full bolton...i know ls1's with just exhaust can make that

It is very farfetched for the mods. I will await track times to see what the real deal is.

SnakeOiler
08-31-2008, 07:49 AM
I wouldn't mind putting my car on THAT dyno.

wrd1972
08-31-2008, 08:05 AM
I wouldn't mind putting my car on THAT dyno.

Kind of sounds like a Tonka truck could lay down some impressive numbers.:lol:

camzaro28
08-31-2008, 09:44 AM
Um, BS. What does an LS1 with full bolt ons put down? 360 at most? The avg LS1 with full bolt ons puts out 350 RW w/ similar TQ.
If not BS, then a very generous Dyno.
GO TO THE TRACK if you want anyone to believe them numbers. It had better trap atleast 110

zlicious94
08-31-2008, 10:07 AM
I dont know why ya all are trippin, I took the car in to a shop with a dyno and those are the results I got! dont know what to tell all you haters except stay posted and watch my vids lots of bolton ls1 kills so get over it, you guys get so butt hurt anytime someone gets a good dyno # or beats a faster car:engarde:

Fixxer99TA
08-31-2008, 10:23 AM
Its not hating, its simply facts... Those numbers are absurdly high for what you have listed in your sig, so someone wasnt correcting for something... If it be temp/humid. or whatever.

If your convinced they are right, as described above take it to the track and run at least 110. If you can, then your definitely making the power your dyno said. If not, then your dyno guy might need some lessons (training rollers? ;))

robsquikz28
08-31-2008, 11:02 AM
were not hating the dyno tuner is lying to you and u believe him either way take it to the and prove a time slip better yet like you said a vid. so we can see the car go down the track and the posted time no lies there

96silverram
08-31-2008, 11:19 AM
The numbers you have posted are going to really get people twisted, if the dyno is correct your track numbers better be in the low to mid 12's and your mph better be at least 114+. My car makes 330 rwhp / 350 rwtq with every single bolt-on mod that can done to a stock heads and stock cam car and those numbers are stout for a pure bolt-on car. I can only think of 2 or 3 cars that have ever beat my dyno numbers as a bolt-on car. The ET in my sig was run when the car was making 323 /343 in 2002. My car is a full weight WS6 6spd with everything working on the car (A/C, t-tops, etc., basically a heavy pig). My current dyno numbers should produce a 12.40 ish pass at 110mph. So, if your car is making 364/397 and it certainly weighs less than mine, it better be in the 12.10's (or better) with a trap speed of no less than 113 mph (more likely 114mph). If you can post those numbers or even close I will be the first to give props on the highest LT1 bolt-on numbers I have ever heard ! :devil:

FYI: I've dyno'd my car a bunch of different times over the years and I can think of one instance when the car was making 323 rwhp/343 rwtq and the car pulled 359 rwhp / 379 rwtq on the dyno. My friend and I immediately looked at the dyno operator (which I know him personally) and said WTF ! He just laughed and said those numbers were incorrect, dyno spike, we just laughed and blew it off. My point being, I knew there was no way my car made 359 / 379, it was a dyno fluke and my track times showed it was not making those kind of numbers.

I will just say, congratulations on the numbers and I sincerely hope the car runs as hard as the dyno numbers. :D

zlicious94
08-31-2008, 11:22 AM
Alright I will take her to the track before the end of the season, just for you guys. Im not saying any of this shit is right on but hey.... until I get to the track then it is what it is :chug:

Fixxer99TA
08-31-2008, 11:25 AM
Theres always room for error even with something as advanced as a dynomometer, and with a human running it, theres even more room ;)

The track will give you a better idea, and us :D

But dont think of it as us hating on you, we arent. So many people come here on a day to day basis and post complete BS that we need to be skeptical. You cant just believe anything these days...

Marc3.4V6
08-31-2008, 11:34 AM
Wait a sec, speak for yourselves...I'm hating!.....




on myself (for going with such a small cam) :bang:

LS1Z28-00
08-31-2008, 11:34 AM
yea i wish you lived close to me id see how those numbers hold up for sure. if you had come on here doubting the numbers no one would jump on you and would say yea dyno error. but thats like me saying yea my heads cam ls1 made 600RWHP and 700TQ N/A. they would laugh me out of the thread.

LSWHO
08-31-2008, 12:17 PM
Well finally after two years and alot of ricer and ford kills later I got her on the rollers and boy she came through!! 364rwhp and 397 rwtq
http://www.fquick.com/LT1freak

I'm not saying you're a liar, but the dyno is.

97z28nightmare
08-31-2008, 12:41 PM
hey where did you get those black zr1's at?

Dave J
08-31-2008, 12:45 PM
:bs:
I cant see it

kinglt-1
08-31-2008, 12:48 PM
If LT1's made that kind of power with bolton's, then most people would be selling there LS1's. Hell alot of LS1's with a mild cam swap don't even make that power/tq. My friend had a lpe gt3 cam in his 01 m6 TA and it put down 380/370 on a mustang dyno! That was thru hooker lt's, hooker catback, lid, 4.10 rear.

7camaro7
08-31-2008, 12:58 PM
that's the same kind of dyno I use man and I've got FBs. I call bs too. I say that dyno was not calibrated correctly. If you had that power it'd be right there with a full bolton+cammed ls1 car. btw I made 334rwhp on DynoDynamics. My flywheel was 427fhp

zlicious94
08-31-2008, 01:32 PM
So if I called this reputable shop and said their dyno was messed up they would laugh and tell me to go screw myself! They dyno alot of exotic cars there so wtf ?? My buddy dynoed his 97 formula there same day and it has just intake,lt headers and exhaust and did 308 rwhp?? so he has no 1.6rr,ewp,cutouts,tune,etc?

IllusionalTA
08-31-2008, 02:00 PM
take your motor out.. i'll give you 5K for it... If my car don't make 340rwhp w/ it.. you owe me 5 G's buddy.. Honestly your the "ONLY" bolt on LTx to "EVER" make over "320"rwhp.. so either your dyno is giving out some good candy, or you have some "other" parts you either don't know about or are failing to mention..

rasputin
08-31-2008, 02:14 PM
bullshit, fix your dyno.

got an LT4 in there?

hyperzone
08-31-2008, 02:47 PM
My buddy dynoed his 97 formula there same day and it has just intake,lt headers and exhaust and did 308 rwhp?? so he has no 1.6rr,ewp,cutouts,tune,etc?
308 RWHP also sounds high for a bone stock LT1 with only CAI & Exhaust. Not as off as your numbers sound but still high.

This thread is kinda funny. I honestly could care less what your dyno numbers are or aren't. I'm just saying that your numbers are freakishly odd for a true bolton LT1 with no nitrous. Would be interesting to see it in person though.

StealthFormula
08-31-2008, 02:56 PM
Thats definetly not right I wish it was for your sake because that would be amazing! Those numbers are considered decent-good for an LT1 that has full boltons and a cam. There are several factors when dynoing a car that can result in really low or high numbers. A dyno thats out of calibration can throw some wack ass numbers. I once put down 408rwtq with boltons and a cam thru my auto which we all know is about 70rwtq too high but it was because the dyno operator put the car on WOT too soon and it kicked down to second instead of staying in third. I hate to say it but those numbers are a good 40-45rwhp too high and eventho thats what the dyno showed doesn't necessarily mean its accurate like I said because theres a ton of variables that can alter numbers greatly.

zlicious94
08-31-2008, 03:28 PM
Ok, so if no bolt on LT1 goes over 320hp then this must be a faulty dyno too?and he has no ewp, 1.6rr's or td's Im just saying its not that crazy of a # I understand the different variables that go with dynos!!
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1996-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28_110973.htm

IronOutlaw
08-31-2008, 03:41 PM
just go run at a track and post your times.

StealthFormula
08-31-2008, 03:59 PM
Ok, so if no bolt on LT1 goes over 320hp then this must be a faulty dyno too?and he has no ewp, 1.6rr's or td's Im just saying its not that crazy of a # I understand the different variables that go with dynos!!
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1996-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28_110973.htm

No offense but its def not just a little crazy of a #, its way way off man. Especially considering that typical 6-speed LT1's do that amount with full boltons and cams like cc503's etc. Definetly has to be something with the dyno, take it somewhere else and see what it does.

IronOutlaw
08-31-2008, 04:14 PM
They dyno alot of exotic cars there so wtf ??

Sounds like they are trying to make some rich people happy for buying expensive cars...

PNYKLR-TA
08-31-2008, 04:27 PM
Sounds like they are trying to make some rich people happy for buying expensive cars...

hahahahhaah i was thinking the same exact thing! thats great. but guys guys what if he made 364 fly wheel horse that sounds more right to me :D:loco:

c5formula
08-31-2008, 04:49 PM
my lt1 layed down 298 an 332 through a 6 speed an a 10 bolt. an that was with lts, 2.25 inch true duals, slp intake, an a air foil. thats no tune an actually running rich, so with the right combo of parts an a good tune its not that far fetched. just gotta have good parts.

96lt1m6
08-31-2008, 05:02 PM
like i stated previously,i definately will not call you out on the dyno numbers cause you did not operate the dyno,however there is a miscalculation....
how many runs did they give you?
i sure hope you trap 110-112 .....

krayzie7th
08-31-2008, 05:19 PM
they do sound a little to high, specially since you said your friend dyno 302 with those mods thats high also. Just go to the track and see what you run if you do run mid low 12's thats a badass lt1 you got there.

wrd1972
08-31-2008, 07:35 PM
Ok, so if no bolt on LT1 goes over 320hp then this must be a faulty dyno too?and he has no ewp, 1.6rr's or td's Im just saying its not that crazy of a # I understand the different variables that go with dynos!!
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1996-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28_110973.htm

STFU and go to the track.:bigun2:
There is clearly a turd in the churn with something here. No ones hating on you, you are being challenged. If a stock Ford 302 claimed to spank a GM LT1 the shit would be flying. Its the same thing here being hat you are making a claim that is extraordinary.

7camaro7
08-31-2008, 07:46 PM
you should do research on dynodynamics. they have a rep for reading VERY low! Your numbers definitely aren't low. as a matter of fact, when you're beating these ls1s, you should be SPANKING them with these numbers if they're bone stock. So if its even a close race, AT ALL, then those number are FAKE.

btw, I'll let you know. A buddy of mine has a lt1 and he's got some bolt ons, him against me?... its not much of a race, now with a 150 shot its a different story. both cars are m6 too

ROWDYZ28
08-31-2008, 08:08 PM
Ok, so if no bolt on LT1 goes over 320hp then this must be a faulty dyno too?and he has no ewp, 1.6rr's or td's Im just saying its not that crazy of a # I understand the different variables that go with dynos!!
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1996-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28_110973.htm

I think you are really excited about the numbers and are in denial about the "Real Truth" that they are on the high side. How long have you had the car?? If you have any form of knowledge about the LT1 then you would say to yourself and on here that the numbers are out-of-wack!! My old set up with the H/C and a small port job of the stock heads only put down 365rwh and 389 trq...you have neither modifications. Just except the fact that you got some high numbers and go dyno again somewhere else or track it and post the video!

ROWDYZ28
08-31-2008, 08:11 PM
take your motor out.. i'll give you 5K for it... If my car don't make 340rwhp w/ it.. you owe me 5 G's buddy.. Honestly your the "ONLY" bolt on LTx to "EVER" make over "320"rwhp.. so either your dyno is giving out some good candy, or you have some "other" parts you either don't know about or are failing to mention..

:gay: < pretty much says it all about your response.

wrd1972
08-31-2008, 08:19 PM
Just lock or delete this thread right now.

TWS
08-31-2008, 08:22 PM
graph in the link says 346rwhp, not 364rwhp. Regardless I think you got a very generous dyno.

Yeah. OP needs to change his original post where he transposed the 4 and the 6.

Even at 346 RWHP, he's going to get a lot of people calling BS.

ScreaminRedZ
09-01-2008, 09:19 AM
^Looks like he changed it. I'm thinking maybe the car has a mild cam or something that he doesn't know about. Unless he's the original, it's possible.

Elliott's94Z
09-01-2008, 10:15 AM
His cars has just the bolt ons pretty much everyone else has on here period...no cam etc etc. He's going to take it somewhere else to dyno it. Just have to wait until then to see.

Get over the hype of him having something else done to the car "that he might not be mentioning" or something the previous owner had done which was suspension work!

zlicious94
09-01-2008, 10:29 AM
Hey guys I have a race coming on video of me and my buddy's 99 SS camaro with full boltons and he dynoed 343rwhp! so if he smokes me obviously the dyno was bad and if I do beat him (should be good race) then guess I do have a "freak": huh!!

10.5LT1
09-01-2008, 10:58 AM
Lets see it

IllusionalTA
09-01-2008, 11:08 AM
if you were close i would dyno your car.. If it made those number's... I'd dyno your car free for the rest of your life.. btw we have a mustang dyno which reads typically 15-20rwhp compared to local dynojet's and DD's that are "Calibrated" correctly. Read lower than our's... FYI>..

wrd1972
09-01-2008, 11:14 AM
Dude you just dont get it.

What is street racing another car and not acquiring elapsed time statistics gonna prove? What if the other guy cant drive? How do you know his numbers are accurate?

Take it to the track and bring back the slips.

zlicious94
09-01-2008, 12:33 PM
Hey Im not a track guy ok! my car is for cruising.Your talking about a couple guys shifting gears on a roll race....ya that takes a skilled driver? Dont be mad cause you spent a bunch of money and your car and its not that strong lol!!! If I was looking for real high #'s I would swich to an LSX motor :engarde:

TABBED 5.3
09-01-2008, 01:18 PM
you should go with an ls1 i heard if you put in a tornado and add lucas fuel additive they put out 400 to the wheels

ROWDYZ28
09-01-2008, 01:25 PM
Hey Im not a track guy ok! my car is for cruising.Your talking about a couple guys shifting gears on a roll race....ya that takes a skilled driver? Dont be mad cause you spent a bunch of money and your car and its not that strong lol!!! If I was looking for real high #'s I would swich to an LSX motor :engarde:

Wonderful you are not a track person. The whole point is to back your dyno up by proving it at the track to shut us up. Bring yourself back to reality and realize your numbers are bogus. Sure, we would all love the same dyno #'s with just bolt on's but let's face the facts..you have several knowledgeable LT1 owners on here telling you it's far fetch. And roll racing another car won't put an end to your #'s regardless of the outcome. Your comment about some of us spending too much $$ on our cars is def one that comes from someone that wishes he or she had the time and or $$ to do it too. FYI my upgrades ran me 4 grand which is not BIG $$ kiddo.

Loser denial is a M/F

Dave J
09-01-2008, 01:59 PM
Hey Im not a track guy ok! my car is for cruising.Your talking about a couple guys shifting gears on a roll race....ya that takes a skilled driver? Dont be mad cause you spent a bunch of money and your car and its not that strong lol!!! If I was looking for real high #'s I would swich to an LSX motor :engarde:
street racing idiots
try that here and the police will crush your car ;)
too many innocent people die from street racers you people make me sick
I bet if you went to the track you couldnt even run a 12 how pathetic I ran 12.70`s with only 285 rwhp and 307 rwtq when I was bolton

wrd1972
09-01-2008, 02:18 PM
Not backing up these dyno claims with the only definitive proof from the track is not very logical on your part? Wanting to street race for comparison purposes to prove your dyno claim is even more insane.

If this were a "My pecker is 15 inches long" thread, your logic would be requesting your buddy to drop his shorts for side by side comparison purposes while the smart thing to do would be go and get a fugging ruler and put the issue to bed.

ROWDYZ28
09-01-2008, 02:28 PM
Not backing up these dyno claims with the only definitive proof from the track is not very logical on your part? Wanting to street race for comparison purposes to prove your dyno claim is even more insane.

If this were a "My pecker is 15 inches long" thread, your logic would be requesting your buddy to drop his shorts for side by side comparison purposes while the smart thing to do would be go and get a fugging ruler and put the issue to bed.

:nod: exactly!! I think he's scared to track it because he knows in his own mind the numbers are incorrect. Hell, why would he want to post up track times or another dyno sheet after all his big talk?? BECAUSE he knows the truth:D

slick1851
09-01-2008, 02:48 PM
Fucken junk, this car didnt make those numbers

drive it off a cliff, and end this thread

You went to a shit shop, with a moron using the dyno

goldmecham
09-01-2008, 03:14 PM
it kinda nutz my friend had a z28 that he bought used that was a bolt on car he thought. had headers and catback and intake, rockers, and the works. that thing ran like a ape till it spun a bearing. when we tore the motor down what did we find. a nice little cam called 227 by crane. so he might have a cam on it and dosnt know.

Elliott's94Z
09-01-2008, 03:53 PM
it kinda nutz my friend had a z28 that he bought used that was a bolt on car he thought. had headers and catback and intake, rockers, and the works. that thing ran like a ape till it spun a bearing. when we tore the motor down what did we find. a nice little cam called 227 by crane. so he might have a cam on it and dosnt know.

HE HAS NO CAM...read the whole thread champ

IllusionalTA
09-01-2008, 04:04 PM
Just a happy dyno

wrd1972
09-01-2008, 04:09 PM
Looking at the dyno graph and taking into account the HP is peaking at 5k RPM, I would guess its the stock cam. If it were a NON stock cam, it certainly does not have much more duration as compared to stock again when looking at the graph. Could certainly be using added lift or LSA to bump the torque up though.

Also from looking at the graph, the torque curve does not come close to resembling the flatness of a bolt on LT1 torque curve. Every similarly equipped LT1 (including mine at the time) had a near flat curve from 2K RPM till fall off.

396 RWHP and only 347RWTQ.
I think he just set the "stump puller" LT1 record. :lol:

Tell you what, I will hook you up to the strap, throw on some mudders and you can come pull some shrubs out in my front yard.

Next we are going to hear about the Freak 10 bolt that refuses to go Kaboom.

goldmecham
09-01-2008, 04:43 PM
[QUOTE=Elliott's94Z;10025053]HE HAS NO CAM...read the whole thread champ[/QUOTE

I did read the whole thing. im just saying did he buy this car new prob not. did he rebuild the motor prob not. so if he didnt rebuild the motor it might have a small cam in it. my buddy bought a used car that had a ton of owners and each of them did things to it and took parts off. but none knew that it had a cam in it till we pulled it apart. so im just saying it might me a chance that YOU DONT KNOW IF A CAM IS IN IT OR NOT UNLESS THE MOTOR WAS APART.
not saying that it has one in it but its happend a few times.

Elliott's94Z
09-01-2008, 06:06 PM
[QUOTE=Elliott's94Z;10025053]HE HAS NO CAM...read the whole thread champ[/QUOTE

I did read the whole thing. im just saying did he buy this car new prob not. did he rebuild the motor prob not. so if he didnt rebuild the motor it might have a small cam in it. my buddy bought a used car that had a ton of owners and each of them did things to it and took parts off. but none knew that it had a cam in it till we pulled it apart. so im just saying it might me a chance that YOU DONT KNOW IF A CAM IS IN IT OR NOT UNLESS THE MOTOR WAS APART.
not saying that it has one in it but its happend a few times.

Well if you read the whole thread you would have the info about "it's the stock f-ing cam" and he knows what internals are in it..anyone else want to throw this assumption out again and get nowhere with it?

I will throw this one out there...maybe he has head work done?? No he does not so this one is over with as well. Let's just end this with it was a generous dyno and he is going to have it on the dyno again for a second look.

goldmecham
09-01-2008, 06:37 PM
why you being a FU(king d!ck about it. im not saying he has a cam in it. you said its stock cam how do you know? was it out and in your hand in a rebuild on the motor. Im not doughting its a stock cam so ease the FU(K up.

PNYKLR-TA
09-01-2008, 07:37 PM
:corn:

and elliot over here is a total :swing:

cause his car dyno'd quiet a bit higher too and he would love to believe its true! haha

Skillet
09-01-2008, 08:06 PM
My stroker motor sucks. Seeing some H/C numbers were enough to make me sad but seeing a stock cam with un worked heads put down those numbers makes me shed a tear. :barf:

Elliott's94Z
09-01-2008, 08:36 PM
:corn:

and elliot over here is a total :swing:

cause his car dyno'd quiet a bit higher too and he would love to believe its true! haha

Actually I didn't have it dynoed ya tool shed. You shouldn't jump to conclusions and put shit on here that's not true cause YOU end up being the dumb fuc*. I could careless what numbers my car puts out..lol

slick1851
09-01-2008, 09:46 PM
[QUOTE=goldmecham;10025336]

Well if you read the whole thread you would have the info about "it's the stock f-ing cam" and he knows what internals are in it..anyone else want to throw this assumption out again and get nowhere with it?

I will throw this one out there...maybe he has head work done?? No he does not so this one is over with as well. Let's just end this with it was a generous dyno and he is going to have it on the dyno again for a second look.

Did he buy the car new?

Who did he buy the car from?

And why hasnt he taken it to a different dyno?


Ever think it could have a stock cam with ported cyclander heads?

Never know what your getting with a used car!

And hes to cool for school to bring the car to the track!

slick1851
09-01-2008, 09:48 PM
Actually I didn't have it dynoed ya tool shed. You shouldn't jump to conclusions and put shit on here that's not true cause YOU end up being the dumb fuc*. I could careless what numbers my car puts out..lol

Why are you swinging off this guys nuts?

Did you use this dyno, whats your car putting down then

LSWHO
09-01-2008, 09:57 PM
So many crybabies. So many.

OP: take it to the track and show us your et/mph, cause now you are trying to validate your bogus and I mean BOGUS #s. Impossible with only boltons. The ONLY way to prove it is to REdyno or even better get us track numbers. Until then you are proving yourself to be more and more of an idiot.

slick1851
09-01-2008, 10:00 PM
So many crybabies. So many.

OP: take it to the track and show us your et/mph, cause now you are trying to validate your bogus and I mean BOGUS #s. Impossible with only boltons. The ONLY way to prove it is to REdyno or even better get us track numbers. Until then you are proving yourself to be more and more of an idiot.

Very well put, put the thing on a different dyno


Hes got a M6 so his driving is going to take away from what it can really do at the track.

Not everyone is Ranger going 10s with a stock Z06, a A4 would show much better resaults

SmokedOutZ28
09-01-2008, 10:23 PM
I don't understand all the fuss.... Anyone who has modded a LT1 in the past or present knows that these numbers are HIGH simple as that! No matter what there will be no further proof that these are accurate and that there is no other mods done to the car then what was posted until the OP is willing to do so, and right now it appears that he isnt so I say drop it and close the damn thread!

This isnt unusual or the first time people have posted Redicilously high dyno numbers for the mods they have but it always ends the same... They post a dyno graph with high numbers, get called out, either disappear because they know it's BS or make a ton of excuses and reasons why there right and were all wrong or tell the damn truth about whats really been done so really why prolong the inevitable? I say Let it die and move on to the next Topic.

Oh BTW my Stock headed 847 cam + bolt on car only dynoed 358/357 and trapped 113 in the 1/4 @ full weight So I would expect the same if not higher.

Elliott's94Z
09-01-2008, 10:28 PM
Why are you swinging off this guys nuts?

Did you use this dyno, whats your car putting down then

Not to sure why I'm all over his sack...lol. Never spoke to or asked this guys opinion once ever. Guess he thinks he's Billy Badass or something and wants to get his post count up by putting up bogus information...:D

I did not get ANY dyno done. All I have stated on here is that he only has bolt ons and the original owner had done nothing but suspension to the car. The motor was stock and every mod done inside was done by my friend here. I have also stated that I thought the dyno was a little generous and that he was going to have another dyno done here soon. I don't know what my car is putting down. I'm waiting for a few more modifications before I dyno/track it next spring.

kinglt-1
09-01-2008, 10:35 PM
"The Day's OF LS1 Tech", The new internet soap opera for fag's!:supergay:

Elliott's94Z
09-01-2008, 10:37 PM
"The Day's OF LS1 Tech", The new internet soap opera for fag's!:lock:

I do stroke a mean one :D and agree this needs to be locked and let him re-dyno and post up the new results at a later day.

SS RRR
09-01-2008, 10:39 PM
Why are we wasting our time arguing about DYNO numbers?

Fixxer99TA
09-01-2008, 11:05 PM
Why are we wasting our time arguing about DYNO numbers?

Good point...

Agreed, let him redyno.... How did this turn into a shit slinging contest anyways?

(And dont just tell me it always ends like this, I know it usually does I am just not sure where along the line it strayed ;))

robsquikz28
09-02-2008, 12:47 AM
is thread over yet

IMgettingLS1
09-02-2008, 10:26 AM
no never :kali:

PNYKLR-TA
09-02-2008, 10:35 AM
Not to sure why I'm all over his sack...lol. Never spoke to or asked this guys opinion once ever. Guess he thinks he's Billy Badass or something and wants to get his post count up by putting up bogus information...:D

I did not get ANY dyno done. All I have stated on here is that he only has bolt ons and the original owner had done nothing but suspension to the car. The motor was stock and every mod done inside was done by my friend here. I have also stated that I thought the dyno was a little generous and that he was going to have another dyno done here soon. I don't know what my car is putting down. I'm waiting for a few more modifications before I dyno/track it next spring.


ok so here is the logic dude that started the thread was talking about his car getting dyno'd and then someone elses with really no performance mods and as i recall you have hardly any performance mods that would make you dyno any great amount higher than stock, so of coarse when you started swinging from his nuts saying its true, that would lead most of us to believe you are the lowly follower who also had his car dyno'd and got whack numbers.

so in that case sorry for calling you out on the dyno comment

but you're still a :swing:

:D

Elliott's94Z
09-02-2008, 12:15 PM
Nope that was another guy getting his Bird dynoed. I was just a spectator in the back playing with my nut sack with a big smile.

PNYKLR-TA
09-02-2008, 12:28 PM
Nope that was another guy getting his Bird dynoed. I was just a spectator in the back playing with my nut sack with a big smile.

ha! ok so i actually laughed out loud for that one, understandable, as i occasionally catch myself with a big grin scratchin the jewels haha. :D

but hey i just want to see the results from the track or another dyno'd i agree to disagree with everyone at this point as this thread has lost all real threadiological value.

alabamapimpin
09-02-2008, 12:37 PM
Woooooooow

Elliott's94Z
09-02-2008, 12:38 PM
ha! ok so i actually laughed out loud for that one, understandable, as i occasionally catch myself with a big grin scratchin the jewels haha. :D

but hey i just want to see the results from the track or another dyno'd i agree to disagree with everyone at this point as this thread has lost all real threadiological value.

I hear ya man..I want to see #'s from another dyno as well. He will do it here soon. But for real though...I was playing with my nuts...:D

AChotrod
09-02-2008, 12:42 PM
I was dreaming I dynoed my car lastnite, and it put down an amazing 575rwhp and 650rwtq and its oly got a cat-back.
Man I love dyno dreams!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Elliott's94Z
09-02-2008, 12:47 PM
I was dreaming I dynoed my car lastnite, and it put down an amazing 575rwhp and 650rwtq and its oly got a cat-back.
Man I love dyno dreams!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thats all you put down??? Weak :D

PNYKLR-TA
09-02-2008, 12:49 PM
and i was actually trying to raise my post count :D

Elliott's94Z
09-02-2008, 12:53 PM
and i was actually trying to raise my post count :D

LMAO...me to that's why I'm replying to this. So whats up? Hows life? LOL!!

Fixxer99TA
09-02-2008, 01:36 PM
Good to see this thread went from shit slinging to post count padding...

Only on LS1tech right? :D

PNYKLR-TA
09-02-2008, 02:08 PM
LMAO...me to that's why I'm replying to this. So whats up? Hows life? LOL!!

hahahahaha this thread rocks! everyone post how your day was so we can all get 10 hundred millions of posts counts!

slomarao
09-02-2008, 02:24 PM
I believe your numbers. I did the numbers in the sig with every bolt on, shorties, no EWP, but the heads have 3 hrs of work in them. The 3 hrs includes a valve job.

If everyone doesnt want to believe you tell them to kiss you ass. Thats the route ive taken. I had a thread on cz28.com and everyone called me BS:confused:

PNYKLR-TA
09-02-2008, 02:28 PM
I believe your numbers. I did the numbers in the sig with every bolt on, shorties, no EWP, but the heads have 3 hrs of work in them. The 3 hrs includes a valve job.

If everyone doesnt want to believe you tell them to kiss you ass. Thats the route ive taken. I had a thread on cz28.com and everyone called me BS:confused:

thats because your obviously lying :D

haha in all seriousness thou, weres the :lock: on this bad boy?

AChotrod
09-02-2008, 02:55 PM
Thats all you put down??? Weak :D

Was dreaming not wishing.LOL!

wrd1972
09-02-2008, 03:28 PM
I believe your numbers. I did the numbers in the sig with every bolt on, shorties, no EWP, but the heads have 3 hrs of work in them. The 3 hrs includes a valve job.

If everyone doesnt want to believe you tell them to kiss you ass. Thats the route ive taken. I had a thread on cz28.com and everyone called me BS:confused:

Dude you are full os $hit too. Nobody on the cz28.com post called bullshit on your NUMBERS although you still continue to state that:eyes:.
Your numbers were just a bit higher than the norm and you were challenged to take it to the track too.

I called BS on your comparison when you were comparing your numbers (with ported heads) to a bolt on only LT1. You dont go comparing and referencing "bolt-on" numbers against your motor with ported heads.

Get a grip and quick crying like a little bitch with her feelings hurt. :gtfo:

And I am glad you are backing the OP with your support. I think you should race each other and the loser can lick the tears off the winners cheeks.

:lock::lock::lock::lock::lock::lock::lock:

slomarao
09-02-2008, 03:42 PM
yay for you you fag. (wrd)

zlicious94
09-02-2008, 03:45 PM
I didnt realize this post would make so many people cry! Oh well, hey we are all on the same team anyways so everyone calm down, and just keep smashin fords and ricers c'mon now:D

PNYKLR-TA
09-02-2008, 04:28 PM
I didnt realize this post would make so many people cry! Oh well, hey we are all on the same team anyways so everyone calm down, and just keep smashin fords and ricers c'mon now:D

well we were all on the same team until you decided to go and lie to your fellow commorades and make us all jealous. why can't we just change all the dyno's calibration to match that of Zlicious94's guy that way we all have more power! YAY! I got mail! YaaaaaaY!!!!

MadMike 97 Z28
09-03-2008, 12:26 AM
sorry i say false readings on the dyno. let me see some mid 12's slips then ill believe it.

LSWHO
09-03-2008, 12:51 AM
Unless you own an LSx or Supra dyno #s are pointless anyway.

zjt
09-03-2008, 01:29 AM
Well finally after two years and alot of ricer and ford kills later I got her on the rollers and boy she came through!! 346rwhp and 397 rwtq


:drool: I love torque :devil: awesome numbers

RealQuick
09-03-2008, 08:40 AM
The numbers seemed skewed a bit, but he could also have a set of ported heads on there and just not know it (like if the previous owner modded it).

Dave J
09-03-2008, 08:55 AM
The numbers seemed skewed a bit, but he could also have a set of ported heads on there and just not know it (like if the previous owner modded it).
maybe he dynoes it with skinnies on the back :D

LT1MAN
09-03-2008, 09:00 AM
dyno spike, no way you make that much torque or horsepower, especially torque

LT1MAN
09-03-2008, 11:17 AM
Not to sure why I'm all over his sack...lol. Never spoke to or asked this guys opinion once ever.

wait a minute, are you talking about the OP? yall are from the same town, is that not him in your sig?

Fixxer99TA
09-03-2008, 12:51 PM
Yeah, he mentioned before that they were friends.