Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Questions for the turbo gurus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2008, 11:34 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DarkJuggalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC / Ansonia,CT
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Questions for the turbo gurus

so i got a couple questions for the turbo gurus, i figured this would be the best place since its the FI section
ill start with i have a 77 nova fully done up at with a 486 BBC with a nice hit of juice, im not very happy with the motor or the cost of race fuel. my buddy proposed a swap between the 2 of us as he wants a BB rather then SB turbo. the deal is his 355 fully forged SB chevy, with aluminum heads, intake, blow threw carb, t76 turbo and full kit, the motor is a 4bolt main, and he has the turbo cam in it now. the motor was originally designed to hold up to a f3 so the crank is keyed and every part of this motor is desired efficiently and is very well built. the only thing not included in this swap is the water to air intercooler but he told me at 10 psi or less i dont need one. at 12 psi he made a lil over 650 to the wheels. it is going into a street/strip car that rarely is takin out of the garage these days, but the swap seems kinda cool. i was just wondering how much power i could possibly make with this motor seeing as he was told the motor will hold up to 50 lbs of boost if he felt that crazy and if the turbo would hold up to it. he is giving me the turbo cam and blower cam, and the motor is currently 8.5:1 compression. he designed it to run on 91 pump gas which is another thing i like. my fuel system, trans, and suspension will work perfect with this if i decide to do it. but what kind of extra maintenance or problems should i worry about doing this swap? and i know im sorry its not a LS1, but i figured you guys have the wisdom no matter what style v8 it is
Old 09-16-2008, 05:33 AM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (14)
 
ModularTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Homestead, FL
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

well if its the SB chevy with the heads that have the 2 middle exhaust ports right next to each other then, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you are limited to 900 hp due to the high amount of heat generated by the ports being so close together. I could be wrong though. Just my .02
Old 09-16-2008, 12:59 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DarkJuggalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC / Ansonia,CT
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea thats the style of heads, 900? ouch
Old 09-16-2008, 03:50 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DarkJuggalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC / Ansonia,CT
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

is that the only thing i have to worry about is 900hp cap?
Old 09-16-2008, 10:40 PM
  #5  
Teching In
 
SSinisterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not sure what you mean by limited to 900hp with a standard port style head? can you please explain cause i must have had some serious freaks before. and one crazy monster in the works!
Old 09-16-2008, 10:45 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
SSinisterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You don't want to through 50lbs at any motor if you ever want it to last more than a second. as for the swap that's not a bad deal if its a straight up trade. i have had plenty of both and would a take a Turbo SB over a BB with spray. mainly preference. as far as maintenance not much more than your current setup i would think. you will have to make sure all your oil lines are tight and don't leak and spark plugs seem to last longer in boosted cars than cars on the bottle.
Old 09-16-2008, 11:27 PM
  #7  
Gingervitis Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
slow67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

You should go to theturboforums.com and go to the chevy section. The heads are not the issue, its the block itself (if its still a standard production block). they crack around 900-1000hp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byVsl3Beldw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exARf...eature=related
Old 09-17-2008, 09:15 AM
  #8  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Correct, the block around 900-1000hp is the weak link. Has nothing to do with head configuration....lol
Old 09-17-2008, 08:51 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DarkJuggalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC / Ansonia,CT
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hmmm, 900-1000. my goal is to just maintain 900 rwhp, so i would be shooting my self in the foot
Old 09-17-2008, 10:40 PM
  #10  
Gingervitis Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
slow67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DarkJuggalo
hmmm, 900-1000. my goal is to just maintain 900 rwhp, so i would be shooting my self in the foot
It might survive a while on a safe tune....or you could upgrade to a dart block.....
Old 09-17-2008, 10:53 PM
  #11  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DarkJuggalo
hmmm, 900-1000. my goal is to just maintain 900 rwhp, so i would be shooting my self in the foot
that setup isn't gonna make 900rwhp on pump gas anyway...
Old 09-18-2008, 09:12 AM
  #12  
Gingervitis Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
slow67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Frost
that setup isn't gonna make 900rwhp on pump gas anyway...
True, but I bet he will still have a lot of fun with it.....



Quick Reply: Questions for the turbo gurus



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.