GXP vs 2010 Camaro LS or LT?
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
GXP vs 2010 Camaro LS or LT?
I haven't been keeping up with car magazines and such. How do the 0-60 times and 1/4 mile times compare between a stock GXP and a stock '10 Camaro V6?
#3
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Almost Arkansas, LA
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpaoaHqX_gk
https://ls1tech.com/forums/ls4-front...camaro-rs.html
Also, about .2-.6 seconds slower, I think.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/ls4-front...camaro-rs.html
Also, about .2-.6 seconds slower, I think.
#5
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Went ahead and looked it up...
GXP 0-60 = 5.7 sec
1/4 = 14.3 sec @ 98 mph
'10 Camaro 0-60 = 5.9 sec
1/4 = 14.5 sec @ 99 mph
Looks like the new V6 Camaros are good racing buddies with LS4 SS and GXP owners!
Be neat to see a video. Somebody else go find one :-p
GXP 0-60 = 5.7 sec
1/4 = 14.3 sec @ 98 mph
'10 Camaro 0-60 = 5.9 sec
1/4 = 14.5 sec @ 99 mph
Looks like the new V6 Camaros are good racing buddies with LS4 SS and GXP owners!
Be neat to see a video. Somebody else go find one :-p
#7
I know. Over an hour waited only to break down and do that search anyway.
BTW, buddy, that's not me being annoying. That's me politely looking the other way. I don't enforce a LOT of rules in here, but calling the mod annoying isn't the way to keep that train running and certainly isn't the foot you want to start off on. OT threads are fine, but if you're going to ask something like published track times for factory stock vehicles you've got to expect a little heat.
BTW, buddy, that's not me being annoying. That's me politely looking the other way. I don't enforce a LOT of rules in here, but calling the mod annoying isn't the way to keep that train running and certainly isn't the foot you want to start off on. OT threads are fine, but if you're going to ask something like published track times for factory stock vehicles you've got to expect a little heat.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know. Over an hour waited only to break down and do that search anyway.
BTW, buddy, that's not me being annoying. That's me politely looking the other way. I don't enforce a LOT of rules in here, but calling the mod annoying isn't the way to keep that train running and certainly isn't the foot you want to start off on. OT threads are fine, but if you're going to ask something like published track times for factory stock vehicles you've got to expect a little heat.
BTW, buddy, that's not me being annoying. That's me politely looking the other way. I don't enforce a LOT of rules in here, but calling the mod annoying isn't the way to keep that train running and certainly isn't the foot you want to start off on. OT threads are fine, but if you're going to ask something like published track times for factory stock vehicles you've got to expect a little heat.
#10
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 78°14′46″N 15°27′56″E
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
I know. Over an hour waited only to break down and do that search anyway.
BTW, buddy, that's not me being annoying. That's me politely looking the other way. I don't enforce a LOT of rules in here, but calling the mod annoying isn't the way to keep that train running and certainly isn't the foot you want to start off on. OT threads are fine, but if you're going to ask something like published track times for factory stock vehicles you've got to expect a little heat.
BTW, buddy, that's not me being annoying. That's me politely looking the other way. I don't enforce a LOT of rules in here, but calling the mod annoying isn't the way to keep that train running and certainly isn't the foot you want to start off on. OT threads are fine, but if you're going to ask something like published track times for factory stock vehicles you've got to expect a little heat.