LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

Just make/relocate a new IAT sensor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2011, 10:37 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Tappeter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central NY State
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Just make/relocate a new IAT sensor

There has been some talk in other threads about inherent problems with the LS4 IAT sensor. It reads hot air present in the MAF caused by location and being close to exhaust and hot air coming back out the throttle body from the engine. It is also pretty slow to react to air temp changes. I made a new IAT that reacts much quicker and relocated at the far front end of the cone filter in my homemade aluminum CAI box. This is pretty easy if you have any soldering skills at all or at least know someone that does. The thermistor in our IAT is slow, you need a faster reacting one and a convienent fixture to hold it. Get a Omega 44005 thermistor (http://www.omega.com/ppt/pptsc.asp?r...NTS&Nav=temd11) scroll down page to find it.
Get a GP Sorensen # 779-19036 IAT from a parts store, I think its a '98 Camaro piece. You will need to replace the thermistor in the Sorensen IAT with the Omega part. Just pull hard but careful on the electrical connector pins in the IAT and the insides will come out intact. Its just basically the connector with 2 pins to which the thermistor is soldered. Carefully cut off the original thermistor at the very end of the pins and solder on the new Omega thermistor. These are small fine wires, so be careful, use a heat sink. When done, push it all back into the plastic Sorensen IAT body.
Get a IAT relocation cable from one of the W Body performance sites or just make a cable yourself with the correct ends. I just drilled a hole in the end of my cone filter which is inside my aluminum air box, I put the new IAT in the hole and connected it with the relocation cable to original IAT cable.
If you look at the picture, you can see the relocation/extention cable entering my cold air box through a rubber grommet at the right rear of the box.
Attached Thumbnails Just make/relocate a new IAT sensor-monteengine1.jpg  
Old 02-18-2011, 05:55 AM
  #2  
Teching In
 
2007SSImpala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice! What specs did you use to build the airbox?
Old 02-18-2011, 10:16 PM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Tappeter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central NY State
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I used my own specs. Basically I measured several times, made a template for trial fitting from matte board and cardboard. Lots of trial fitting. This is not the first CAI box I have made though. I made one for my 2001 Monte SS with the 3.8L and my 05 Grand Prix GTP.
I also looked at a lot of photos of commerically available units. I just like to do it myself and save hundreds of $$$$. Standard aluminum sheet and plexiglass. I also insulated the interior of the box for heat and sound. Use caution though. This box rubbed against an air conditioning tube sensor cable and broke a wire. Cost me $$ to find out why my air conditioning wouldn't work!
Old 02-19-2011, 12:54 AM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice write up tappeter.
What ever happed to your intake swap?
Old 02-19-2011, 08:19 AM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Dom87SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mchenry, IL
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i know there are probably a lot of people looking at this saying what is a thermistor, or i dont know how to properly solder small wire like that. Something you may want to consider, though a little time consuming is to build some and off them up for sale. granted it would take sourcing IAT housings, but im sure there are a lot more people willing to buy the item than do it them selves.
Old 02-19-2011, 08:48 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Ill_Born_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not to create problems or anything like that.. your efforts are commendable but..
by moveing the IAT out into cooler air you are actually decreasing your performance. The whole principal behind the IAT is to give an accurate temp to the air as it enters the combustion chamber, combined with an accurate fuel measure to keep your A/F ratio as close to 14.7-1. Even though you move the thermistor to a cooler position ,the air in the induction system is still being heated as it passes through the system and this would require less fuel for the less dense air and also less timing to produce optimal performance. Instead by moving the IAT out into cooler temps the engine management would in fact be adding more fuel than is really required. Now if there was a way to actually lower the actual temp of the combustion air prior to entrance to the combustion chamber we could actually benifit by such a mod.
Old 02-19-2011, 10:56 AM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ill_Born_ss
Not to create problems or anything like that.. your efforts are commendable but..
by moveing the IAT out into cooler air you are actually decreasing your performance. The whole principal behind the IAT is to give an accurate temp to the air as it enters the combustion chamber, combined with an accurate fuel measure to keep your A/F ratio as close to 14.7-1. Even though you move the thermistor to a cooler position ,the air in the induction system is still being heated as it passes through the system and this would require less fuel for the less dense air and also less timing to produce optimal performance. Instead by moving the IAT out into cooler temps the engine management would in fact be adding more fuel than is really required. Now if there was a way to actually lower the actual temp of the combustion air prior to entrance to the combustion chamber we could actually benifit by such a mod.
This is why I have not moved my IAT sensor. I have researched this mod a few years ago and was all set to pull the trigger. The IAT sensor is supposed to be as close to the TB as possible and boosted guy's like to put the sensor into the intake manifold.
My only problem with the sensor is that it reads very slowly.. There is probably a reason for this though..
Old 02-19-2011, 11:18 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Brian396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ottawa IL
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The stock IAT sensor in the MAF gets heat soaked and stays hot. It reports the temp of the MAF not the intake air temp. I used the MSD IAT sensor (I think it uses the omega thermister?) mounted in a TB spacer. Works really well and heat soak is not a problem. Last summer I went from a pegged IAT (its like 150* or 199* I don’t recall) to a few deg over ambient in a matter of seconds by driving down the road.
Old 02-19-2011, 11:46 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brian396
I used the MSD IAT sensor (I think it uses the omega thermister?) mounted in a TB spacer
Does this mean your using a LS6 intake with your turbo?
Old 02-19-2011, 12:13 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Brian396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ottawa IL
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No, as of right now still have the LS4 intake with an 1 ½ tb spacer.
Old 02-19-2011, 01:49 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Ill_Born_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

did you move the IAT when you removed the MAF and areyou runnin the intercooler?



Quick Reply: Just make/relocate a new IAT sensor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.