LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

Increasing displacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2012, 05:28 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Sadden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 383
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Increasing displacement

So i believe that with our shorter crank a stroker is out of the question. Has anyone bored one of these bad boys out?
If no is it theoretically possible?
Old 02-20-2012, 05:44 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
neilownz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Needs to be resleeved. It is expensive.
Old 02-22-2012, 10:27 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
V8ImpSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

no the stock sleeves will go out to LS1/LS6 specs, thats what I'm planning

I believe theres a guy running a stroker turbo motor, not that the car actually works with that kind of power...it was a custom made crank by one of the big dawgs Callies, Lunati, ect...
Old 02-23-2012, 06:20 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Ill_Born_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by V8ImpSS
no the stock sleeves will go out to LS1/LS6 specs, thats what I'm planning
HAAA,Haaaa Ha.....ROFL
Old 02-23-2012, 09:25 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
neilownz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What's the point if you can't bore out to 4 inch...
Old 02-23-2012, 10:20 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
V8ImpSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ill_Born_ss
HAAA,Haaaa Ha.....ROFL
Is it just on the LS4's then? I have a 5.3 h.o. Aluminum block truck motor that's a .030 over, stroked, and twin turbo on stock sleeves
Old 02-23-2012, 11:46 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
neilownz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Might be able to get 3.8 or a little more out of the stock ones.

It's a lot of machining to cut the old ones out etc. Darton makes sleeves for other ls motors.
http://www.dartonsleeves.com/sl_chevy.htm
Old 02-23-2012, 12:32 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
94ss06gxp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mid MI
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

too expensive, it would be cheaper/more power-to-dollar if you just went with a turbo.
Old 02-23-2012, 12:43 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
 
V8ImpSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 94ss06gxp
too expensive, it would be cheaper/more power-to-dollar if you just went with a turbo.
the car tuning turbo kit is $5500 for 500hp EDIT: 500 wheel horse power

a re sleeve and rebuild with a cam, valve spring, 1.8:1 rockers, hypereutectic pistons, dod delete, and LS6 intake is what $3500-4000 tops depending on the shop for similar power numbers, theres plenty of proven LS6 combo's at or near 500 horse

Last edited by V8ImpSS; 02-23-2012 at 04:40 PM.
Old 02-23-2012, 02:07 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bryan921SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Zeeland, MI
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

This thread is

If you want to bore the engine out then do it...report back to us on the dollar amount and the dyno results.



Edit: Also you need to add 2-3K to your budget for a built trans...check out TEP for parts.
Old 02-23-2012, 02:18 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
V8ImpSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There has got to be someone on here who has done it already and can shed some light on us. Or at least someone who knows for sure how big the stock sleeves can go. Either way I don't want more than 500 horse in this car, or it will be stupid for the street
Old 02-23-2012, 04:00 PM
  #12  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Aaron_Provost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Note - The turbo puts you at 500 to the wheels
Old 02-23-2012, 04:15 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
94ss06gxp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mid MI
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aaron_Provost
Note - The turbo puts you at 500 to the wheels
exactly my point.. . . I can see maybe 380-410 to the wheels with the setup you want to do.

Also remember if your cam is bigger you will need a higher stall also. just by guess how you want a 500hp N/A LS4 setup, im sure you will use a radical cam.
Old 02-23-2012, 04:30 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
 
V8ImpSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 94ss06gxp
exactly my point.. . . I can see maybe 380-410 to the wheels with the setup you want to do.

Also remember if your cam is bigger you will need a higher stall also. just by guess how you want a 500hp N/A LS4 setup, im sure you will use a radical cam.
Forgot I was comparing apples to oranges with the power numbers...whoopsie

All things equal tho that turbo kit comes with a cutout, Water/meth injection, And a high flow cat...so figure an extra 30hp minimum, and around $700, with the addition of those to the natural aspirated motor, and if you up your compression with the water meth kit you can add like 10% more power

Starting to become clear to me that either way you can end up 500 wheel horse power for about the same money...but the turbo will get you way better mileage if you can keep ur foot out of it

As far as the cam I want to use, I want to move all the power to the mid and top end because I already have too much low end power for FWD, while maintaining drivability which is #1 priority, but that doesn't mean I'll NEED a stall converter, it's the same for the turbo as far as that because of lag, the stall converter can just make you faster but only if you can plant the power, which we can't

Last edited by V8ImpSS; 02-23-2012 at 04:36 PM.
Old 02-23-2012, 05:21 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ryanisl33t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Might as well drop in an M6 and convert the son bitch to RWD and slap a GTO badge on it.
Old 02-23-2012, 06:42 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
LS1 Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 78°14′46″N 15°27′56″E
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default



This will be interesting.

Our small-bore 5.3 motors lend themselves better to turbocharging than to *****-out N/A power. We just don't have the options for making cubes that the other LS motors have.

No matter what we do, we have a sub-4.00" bore and are limited to a single crank (unless we spend big $$ for a custom one), so getting to your 500 HP without FI is going to make for a high-winding screamer that probably won't be much fun on the street.

If I had $9000-$10,000 that I wanted to drop on my Impala, I'd just do a bottom-end with some decent forged flat-tops and an LS9 camshaft. I'd ditch the 243 heads in favor of some CNC'd 317s to get the compression down. Up top, I'd do an LS6 intake, FMIC and a moderately sized turbo like a 6152. I'd also get a progressive system from AlkyControl and run 100% methanol. With this combo, one could easily get to 500 WHP at about 18-20 PSI, maybe less.

The result would be a fun car that won't break **** every week.
Old 02-23-2012, 11:44 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Sadden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 383
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Hmm , maybe i need to pull the heads and have a pro look at them and tell me what he thinks. I wouldnt wanna take it out to 6.0l of displacement , but adding a little displacement wouldnt hurt my feelings any.
Old 02-24-2012, 12:03 AM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
gxp-miller-gxp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: louisiana
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dont waste your time, just get the turbo and have more manageable power for the same price. and you wont have to worry about breaking anything ( not including trans) plus doing the turbo kit you will have plenty of help and assistance from nearly anyone. if you are gong to go through all that work just sell it and buy an ls1 or ls2 or something
Old 02-24-2012, 05:57 AM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Ill_Born_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Sadden
So i believe that with our shorter crank a stroker is out of the question. Has anyone bored one of these bad boys out?
If no is it theoretically possible?
Sorry man, I got distracted yesterday with the boring (oversize) comments.
All the LS cranks have the same size journals and are internal length the same. The shorter part of the crank you refer to can be machined off of any of them for use in our block (xx.0 off the snout and xx.0 off the tail) reluctor wheels are changeable and the flexplates can be changed to match to accomadate the bolt pattern as in 6,8 or 9 bolt pattern.
Connecting rods are also very adaptable.
As for the max safe oversize due to the small bore (thin sleeve)this sleeve can only be opened up by 0.010 (though GM recommends max OS to be half that or less) in the 5.3 alumi block...iron blocks can safely go to 3.900. You can have it resleeved for in excess of 2500.00 and a chance of distorting the block and then gambling that there is not an internal leak shortly after the first run.

Last edited by Ill_Born_ss; 02-24-2012 at 06:27 AM.
Old 02-24-2012, 07:05 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
94ss06gxp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mid MI
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I also dont see you making 500 on a ls6 intake also



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 PM.