Close to stock LT1 dyno
11-13-2008, 10:45 AM
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Charlotte, FL
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NOT stock LT1 dyno We took the Wifes LT1 / M6 Camaro to Aftermath Performance for some baseline numbers before the mods begin.
It put down 292/321 SAE
We were very happy with the numbers. I was a little concerend with it making the power that it should. I did a backyard rebuld on it and was unsure of it having proper ring seal. It looks like all is well.
The only mods that it has is full exhaust (pace setter LT's, ORY, magnaflow cat back) K&N CAI, and an electric water pump.
Now I need stuff an 8.8 under it
It put down 292/321 SAE
We were very happy with the numbers. I was a little concerend with it making the power that it should. I did a backyard rebuld on it and was unsure of it having proper ring seal. It looks like all is well.The only mods that it has is full exhaust (pace setter LT's, ORY, magnaflow cat back) K&N CAI, and an electric water pump.
Now I need stuff an 8.8 under it
Last edited by mpe331lx; 11-13-2008 at 08:45 PM.
11-13-2008, 11:19 AM
#5
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Charlotte, FL
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How is it NOT close to stock?
It has three minor mods (exhaust, CAI, EWP)
Stock: heads, cam, rockers, intake, throttle body (no air foil), pullies, FPR, PCM/Tune, clutch, flywheel, trans, driveshaft, Rear end and so on.
I am not making the claim to making the most power at all. I am stating that I am happy with what it put down.
I would like to see the graphs on the cars that put down 310. It is very easy for a savy dyno operator/tuner to skew the numbers up or down with adjustments in the correction factor. That is why I make sure that it is set at 1.0 SAE correction factor, not uncorrected or STD corrected (which will show more power).
11-13-2008, 11:33 AM
#7
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly what it says, close to stock. Is there anything decieving in the title?
How is it NOT close to stock?
It has three minor mods (exhaust, CAI, EWP)
Stock: heads, cam, rockers, intake, throttle body (no air foil), pullies, FPR, PCM/Tune, clutch, flywheel, trans, driveshaft, Rear end and so on.
I am not making the claim to making the most power at all. I am stating that I am happy with what it put down.
I would like to see the graphs on the cars that put down 310. It is very easy for a savy dyno operator/tuner to skew the numbers up or down with adjustments in the correction factor. That is why I make sure that it is set at 1.0 SAE correction factor, not uncorrected or STD corrected (which will show more power).
How is it NOT close to stock?
It has three minor mods (exhaust, CAI, EWP)
Stock: heads, cam, rockers, intake, throttle body (no air foil), pullies, FPR, PCM/Tune, clutch, flywheel, trans, driveshaft, Rear end and so on.
I am not making the claim to making the most power at all. I am stating that I am happy with what it put down.
I would like to see the graphs on the cars that put down 310. It is very easy for a savy dyno operator/tuner to skew the numbers up or down with adjustments in the correction factor. That is why I make sure that it is set at 1.0 SAE correction factor, not uncorrected or STD corrected (which will show more power).
like i said the first time they are nice numbers for sure, but saying close to stock i agree is a little decieving.
i mean in reality the car is closer to full bolt on's than full stock.
Trending Topics
11-13-2008, 12:10 PM
#8
Exactly what it says, close to stock. Is there anything decieving in the title?
How is it NOT close to stock?
It has three minor mods (exhaust, CAI, EWP)
Stock: heads, cam, rockers, intake, throttle body (no air foil), pullies, FPR, PCM/Tune, clutch, flywheel, trans, driveshaft, Rear end and so on.
I am not making the claim to making the most power at all. I am stating that I am happy with what it put down.
I would like to see the graphs on the cars that put down 310. It is very easy for a savy dyno operator/tuner to skew the numbers up or down with adjustments in the correction factor. That is why I make sure that it is set at 1.0 SAE correction factor, not uncorrected or STD corrected (which will show more power).
How is it NOT close to stock?
It has three minor mods (exhaust, CAI, EWP)
Stock: heads, cam, rockers, intake, throttle body (no air foil), pullies, FPR, PCM/Tune, clutch, flywheel, trans, driveshaft, Rear end and so on.
I am not making the claim to making the most power at all. I am stating that I am happy with what it put down.
I would like to see the graphs on the cars that put down 310. It is very easy for a savy dyno operator/tuner to skew the numbers up or down with adjustments in the correction factor. That is why I make sure that it is set at 1.0 SAE correction factor, not uncorrected or STD corrected (which will show more power).
both of them lol, maybe more like mildly modded that would be better probably.
11-13-2008, 12:23 PM
#11
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hahaha was really just pokin fun at ya man after the first one, but i really like the looks of that stang you got, and i effin hate stangs. those rims look pretty nice on there and i was thinking about going with a simliar color for my white sleek beak TA
11-13-2008, 12:24 PM
#12
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Nice numbers though! I bet it's a damn fun car haha Props on having a significant other who can appreciate (and drive) a muscle car
11-13-2008, 12:26 PM
#13
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mpe331 what color is that camaro in ur sig? kinda looks like my car when the sun isnt hitting it. mine is dark green grey metallic in the sun it looks green at dusk and night time it looks gun metal grey.
11-13-2008, 01:02 PM
#14
Purple pearl. I had a convert. Z/28 in that color, it's a beautiful color.
11-13-2008, 01:50 PM
#18
Stock lt1, stock z28...is anyone so technical that they would distinguish anything between those two? But who cares, those are nice numbers and the mods are almost exactly what are going on my car('94 M6). Now I know a little more what to expect. I think I ran into your wifey on lt1tech. Congrats on finding a girl that has great taste in cars. And, I agree, Nice Cobra.
11-13-2008, 01:51 PM
#19
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly what it says, close to stock. Is there anything decieving in the title?
How is it NOT close to stock?
It has three minor mods (exhaust, CAI, EWP)
Stock: heads, cam, rockers, intake, throttle body (no air foil), pullies, FPR, PCM/Tune, clutch, flywheel, trans, driveshaft, Rear end and so on.
I am not making the claim to making the most power at all. I am stating that I am happy with what it put down.
I would like to see the graphs on the cars that put down 310. It is very easy for a savy dyno operator/tuner to skew the numbers up or down with adjustments in the correction factor. That is why I make sure that it is set at 1.0 SAE correction factor, not uncorrected or STD corrected (which will show more power).
How is it NOT close to stock?
It has three minor mods (exhaust, CAI, EWP)
Stock: heads, cam, rockers, intake, throttle body (no air foil), pullies, FPR, PCM/Tune, clutch, flywheel, trans, driveshaft, Rear end and so on.
I am not making the claim to making the most power at all. I am stating that I am happy with what it put down.
I would like to see the graphs on the cars that put down 310. It is very easy for a savy dyno operator/tuner to skew the numbers up or down with adjustments in the correction factor. That is why I make sure that it is set at 1.0 SAE correction factor, not uncorrected or STD corrected (which will show more power).
