LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Ls1 lid conversion with fitment issue: Wich rubber coupling do i use ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2011, 01:33 PM
  #21  
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
marc1130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Clarksville, MD
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

For anyone else thinking of doing this, avoid Lowe's American Valve brand plastic coupler - it will warp after a day, put a damper on the air flow and its a little pricier than the Fernco:

American Valve Brand:


American Valve Brand:


Fernco:


Fernco:


Fernco:

Last edited by marc1130; 07-10-2011 at 01:44 PM.
Old 07-10-2011, 02:42 PM
  #22  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

This is the one I used. Figured I would get something that is actually made to fit instead of some ugly sewer connector.

http://intakehoses.com/Merchant2/mer...gory_Code=RHH8
Old 07-10-2011, 05:18 PM
  #23  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
GREGG 97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've noticed on other peoples setups that used the complete lower airbox that the lid sat much higher. Mine lines up very well, but I just used the upper rad support piece. I used a 1/2 fernco from maf to tb, then flexible part of my old rubber intake from lid to maf. I think it looks very clean and factory. Link below.
Old 07-10-2011, 09:31 PM
  #24  
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
marc1130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Clarksville, MD
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

looks good, in my case i have a 98+ front end with the taller ws6 lower airbox, all of which was unmodified because it fits no problem, mine definitely sits 3" higher.
Old 07-10-2011, 10:42 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Badazz 97 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i used the smooth air bellow that came with the LS1 lid. It worked ok, not entirely happy with how it connects but it works. If it was 1in longer and had a little more of an angle it would be perfect.

I had the same issues with it being at a different height then the throttle body.
Old 07-11-2011, 04:00 AM
  #26  
On The Tree
 
hoursetraitor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: lynnwood,wa
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

is the lid really better than the k&n intake???
I've heard its not
Old 07-11-2011, 10:44 AM
  #27  
On The Tree
 
97 6speed z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Post

Originally Posted by DVS LT1
Good thread. I’ve been wondering how I’m going to address this problem when I do my lid swap. My engine already sits lower than normal thanks to my BMR k-member, so I know its going to be a challenge to link up the MAF between the lid and TB… and I won’t be carving up the lid base/rad support b/c it can clear my ram air hood.

A 45 degree silicon pipe or this other one someone posted http://intakehoses.com/Merchant2/mer...gory_Code=RHH8 looks pretty smart. As for coupler widths, aren’t we all running 3.5” MAF regardless of year? Until now I understood we needed (and as far as I know I’m currently using) a 3.5” to 4” coupler to connect the MAF to TB. Guy’s are using a 3” to 3” to do this??

Part of the misunderstanding here is due to the fact that the Fernco 3" coupler that sooooooooo .......... many people are using is NOT really 3 inches in inside diameter!

Please reference my post in this thread: http://www.camaroz28.com/forums/showthread.php?t=645462

to see the actual dimensions of the "3 inch" Fernco.
Old 07-11-2011, 11:23 AM
  #28  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have no idea why people are using couplers from the MAF-Lid considering lids were designed to have the maf slid into them.
Old 07-11-2011, 11:30 AM
  #29  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
GREGG 97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DVS LT1
I like this piece you are using
http://www.fquick.com/garages/viewga...wimg&id=311346

is that a 3.5" to 4" fernco reducer?
No, it's just 1/2 of a 3" fernco coupler. If you heat it up for a few minutes in a pot of hot water it gets very soft and flexible, then you can quickly put it on the tb. It will mold to the oval shape of the tb very easily. Them connect the maf to it, that fits easily on it. From the maf to tb is part of my old intake bellow, it makes a nice connector when you cut it off the rubber elbow and trim it a bit.
Old 07-11-2011, 11:39 AM
  #30  
On The Tree
 
97 6speed z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Post

Originally Posted by DVS LT1
INteresting... so what would the inside diameter of a 4" to 3" fernco coupler be on the 4" side? This is the closest/quickest thing I've found and something I can buy locally:
http://www.homedepot.ca/product/4-in...oupling/977091
As long as the 3" side will fit over the MAF that's great. And if the 4" side is actually larger then it will fit over the TB no problem but hopefully it won't be too wide (although the clamps would tighten it either way).

I still like that reducer with the bulge in the middle ( http://intakehoses.com/Merchant2/mer...gory_Code=RHH8 ). This one looks ideal for those of us who need to bend the coupler to correct the downward angle from the lid.
On the 4" side the Fernco would have a minimum of a 4.5" inside diameter, (maybe even slightly larger?).

As for that being TOO wide, remember the 3.5" inside diameter 3" Fernco coupler and be "forced" over the OVAL throttle body quite nicely, a 4.5" inside diameter round rubber coupler end would be significanly larger than the LT1 throttle body "oval".
Old 07-11-2011, 11:41 AM
  #31  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
GREGG 97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
I have no idea why people are using couplers from the MAF-Lid considering lids were designed to have the maf slid into them.
They designed ls1 lids to accept an lt1 maf? That's surprising....I tried to connect my slp lid to my lt1 maf and they wouldn't fit. I had to really force it in there, and it didn't want to stay there. I was afraid I would break the lid. I also trimmed the opening to correct the angle a bit. Before and after the trimming it didn't fit too well though. I thought the flexible bellow made a much better and cleaner connection.
Old 07-11-2011, 11:46 AM
  #32  
On The Tree
 
97 6speed z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Post

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
I have no idea why people are using couplers from the MAF-Lid considering lids were designed to have the maf slid into them.
I agree 100% with this statement! My 3.5" outside diameter LT1 MAF sensor ....... fit perfectly within my SLP LS1 lid!!!
Old 07-11-2011, 11:52 AM
  #33  
On The Tree
 
97 6speed z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Post

Originally Posted by GREGG 97Z
They designed ls1 lids to accept an lt1 maf? That's surprising....I tried to connect my slp lid to my lt1 maf and they wouldn't fit. I had to really force it in there, and it didn't want to stay there. I was afraid I would break the lid. I also trimmed the opening to correct the angle a bit. Before and after the trimming it didn't fit too well though. I thought the flexible bellow made a much better and cleaner connection.
GREGG 97, I have NO idea what may be going on here, but, like I said above, my SLP LS1 aftermarket lid fit my LT1 MAF sensor ......... perfectly! No cutting of the lid required at all!
Old 07-11-2011, 11:55 AM
  #34  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
GREGG 97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^^^Mine didn't? I bought it new for a 99 ls1 from slp about 2 years ago. maybe they changed something cause mine would not fit easily at all. Then it was much worse fit after I cut the opening to correct the angle. That's when I decided to use my rubber bellow connector.
Old 07-11-2011, 12:21 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
 
streetwarrior96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I found one at Home Depot

Old 07-11-2011, 05:41 PM
  #36  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GREGG 97Z
They designed ls1 lids to accept an lt1 maf? That's surprising....I tried to connect my slp lid to my lt1 maf and they wouldn't fit. I had to really force it in there, and it didn't want to stay there. I was afraid I would break the lid. I also trimmed the opening to correct the angle a bit. Before and after the trimming it didn't fit too well though. I thought the flexible bellow made a much better and cleaner connection.
Considering LT1 MAF's and LS1 MAF's are the same yes.
Old 07-11-2011, 05:43 PM
  #37  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DVS LT1
Those of us LT1 guys who do the proper LS1 lid conversion (not cutting out the base) end up having the open end of the lid sitting much higher than the level of the TB. So some guys need to use flexible coupler from the lid to the MAF and a second one to the TB in order to form a bent pathway. The trick is forming a pathway that's seamless and without any major kinks or folds in the coupler.
That's how it is on LS1's too, and that's why I bought the correct coupler I linked earlier in this thread instead of the POS home depot one.




Last edited by speed_demon24; 07-11-2011 at 06:00 PM.
Old 10-06-2015, 12:27 PM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Vicious95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elkton, Va
Posts: 1,831
Received 52 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

Old thread, speed demon, that page with the link you added has moved. Can you tell us which coupler it is?
Old 10-06-2015, 01:31 PM
  #39  
TECH Apprentice
 
CamOnlyJabroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 321
Received 88 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vicious95Z28
Old thread, speed demon, that page with the link you added has moved. Can you tell us which coupler it is?
95 percent positive it is this one. I used the link on LS1tech while it still worked a year ago and am pretty sure it is the 4 to 3.5".

http://www.intakehoses.com/mm5/merch...duct_Code=4H35
Old 10-06-2015, 01:59 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Vicious95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elkton, Va
Posts: 1,831
Received 52 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=CamOnlyJabroni;18991848]95 percent positive it is this one. I used the link on LS1tech while it still worked a year ago and am pretty sure it is the 4 to 3.5".

http://www.intakehoses.com/mm5/merch...duct_Code=4H35[/QUOTE

You sir are the man! Thanks!



Quick Reply: Ls1 lid conversion with fitment issue: Wich rubber coupling do i use ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.