LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

New engne build. Let me know what you think...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2011, 11:03 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
green96ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default New engne build. Let me know what you think...

Ok ill be using a factory 4 bolt block and a factory crank. Here is the list of components...

Bottom End
Factory Crank
L2256 Forged pistons
Forged i beams
Factory 4 Bolt
ARP Main and Rod Hardware

Top End
1.6 NSA Roller Rockers
Guide Plates
Ported Factory castings flowing in the 260/180 range
CC306
150-200 Nitrous Outlet Plate Kit

I know there is a lot more small stuff i need, but that is the gist of the idea i got goin on. im thinking somewhere in the 390-410 RWHP H/A range and then with the nitrous depending on size of shot in the 550 RWHP range. Hoping to score some mid 10's
Old 01-16-2011, 11:08 PM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Tampa_97_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St Petersburg, Fl
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That should be nice, i am looking for a 4 Bolt Block myself for a LT4 build. Good luck with it when you get the build started!
Old 01-16-2011, 11:28 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
lethal bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dekalb, Ms
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Tampa_97_SS
That should be nice, i am looking for a 4 Bolt Block myself for a LT4 build. Good luck with it when you get the build started!
Theres one for sale in the classifieds right now.
Old 01-17-2011, 05:34 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Sounds like a good plan so far. Who do you plan on doing the heads? If it's one of the big two, I'd suggest opting for a custom grind cam instead of the 306.

What are you using as a stall converter?
Old 01-17-2011, 06:27 AM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

How did you go about picking that piston??? Thicker rings than stock for more parasitic loss and a LOT heavier than stock.

Not that flow numbers are the real measure of a head but I am going to guess he chose LE1s which Lloyd advertises as "flow about 260/180 CFM" right on his website. Lloyd also puts a 360-400+rwhp range I would assume the high end of that would be with one of his custom cams not a decade+ old dinosaur cam. So how is it you expect to hit the stated HP goal, through an A4 no less?

You are buying parts on price and price alone, that will be expensive in the long run.

May well get 10s out of it, but if you did it right you could do better.
Old 01-17-2011, 06:42 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
95mysticta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

If you want to run the CC306 despite what others are telling you otherwise do it. Sure it will benifit you to buy custom grind suited for for the heads and goal you have in mind but its your build/budget. The biggest thing you need to do is get that cam to breathe and you need more headflow and compression to make the best out of it. I would look into a bigger head to match the cam and run at minimum a full point of compression more then stock. Thats the biggest mistake alot of stock headed stock shortblock cc306users do is slap that big cam in there wonder why it doesnt work and pull down low and screams up high where your limits of a stock bottom end are with it running out of steam with small volume headflow.

So the answer is yes you can make your goal for sure but IMHO you need to have compression and a head that will match that big cam as i dont think 260/180 cfm is going to cut it with that big cam.
Old 01-17-2011, 07:33 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
green96ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
How did you go about picking that piston??? Thicker rings than stock for more parasitic loss and a LOT heavier than stock.

Not that flow numbers are the real measure of a head but I am going to guess he chose LE1s which Lloyd advertises as "flow about 260/180 CFM" right on his website. Lloyd also puts a 360-400+rwhp range I would assume the high end of that would be with one of his custom cams not a decade+ old dinosaur cam. So how is it you expect to hit the stated HP goal, through an A4 no less?

You are buying parts on price and price alone, that will be expensive in the long run.

May well get 10s out of it, but if you did it right you could do better.
I will not pay 500 dollars for a set of pistons, just will not. i mean what am i going to lose? 50 hp? no.

as for the cc306, im fine with the fact that its old technology. Its proven its self time and time again.

and on the heads right now im looking at a set that flows more in realm of the LE2 heads.

I plan reaching my goal by spinning the cam to its full potential. There are entirely too many people who do not spin that cam as far as it needs to be spun. Too many people running it on stock bottom ends. plus the wide split in duration is good for N2O.

Originally Posted by 95mysticta
If you want to run the CC306 despite what others are telling you otherwise do it. Sure it will benifit you to buy custom grind suited for for the heads and goal you have in mind but its your build/budget. The biggest thing you need to do is get that cam to breathe and you need more headflow and compression to make the best out of it. I would look into a bigger head to match the cam and run at minimum a full point of compression more then stock. Thats the biggest mistake alot of stock headed stock shortblock cc306users do is slap that big cam in there wonder why it doesnt work and pull down low and screams up high where your limits of a stock bottom end are with it running out of steam with small volume headflow.

So the answer is yes you can make your goal for sure but IMHO you need to have compression and a head that will match that big cam as i dont think 260/180 cfm is going to cut it with that big cam.
im looking at some right now that are more like a le2, i am wanting heads that flow a little more, but its finding them that make the choices few and far between. and im gonna go with 52cc combustion chambers for compression, just diddnt put that up there.
Old 01-17-2011, 08:05 AM
  #8  
Resident Racing Jerk
iTrader: (1)
 
vtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: sc
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

those humongous thick rings will work just fine. people been flying with those for years. the cc306 would be a pretty decent cam on the bottle, but otherwise i would give bullet a call. (cc306 would be a budget minded selection)
Old 01-17-2011, 09:08 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
TAEnvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
How did you go about picking that piston??? Thicker rings than stock for more parasitic loss and a LOT heavier than stock.

Not that flow numbers are the real measure of a head but I am going to guess he chose LE1s which Lloyd advertises as "flow about 260/180 CFM" right on his website. Lloyd also puts a 360-400+rwhp range I would assume the high end of that would be with one of his custom cams not a decade+ old dinosaur cam. So how is it you expect to hit the stated HP goal, through an A4 no less?

You are buying parts on price and price alone, that will be expensive in the long run.

May well get 10s out of it, but if you did it right you could do better.

Well you may not believe that it can be done with a "decade old dinosaur cam" but well your just plain wrong.

DJM_E22 made 403whp SAE through a 9" and T56 with a cc306 and LE1s. Been a while since I talked to llyod about it but I dont think DJM went with the valve upgrade which would mean he has stock valves.
Old 01-17-2011, 11:08 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
May well get 10s out of it, but if you did it right you could do better.

I said it may well get the job done.

The pistons are not a deal breaker either but all the extra weight is bad for rodbolt/bearing life. There is tremendous stress on those parts when the piston hits TDC and the rod has to stop it and pull it back down on the intake stroke, a lighter piston makes for a LOT less load on critical parts at that time.

When I was a little younger I did things on price and learned that it is a lot more expensive in the long run.
Old 01-17-2011, 11:58 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
1961ba427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by green96ta
I will not pay 500 dollars for a set of pistons, just will not. i mean what am i going to lose? 50 hp? no.
I'm probably going to be using those same pistons when I rebuild. I'm looking at them in the Probe brand...pistons and moly rings for about $350. I know there are better/lighter/coated/etc choices available, but I'm not comparing $500 to $350....I'm comparing $350 to about $200 for hyper LT1 pistons/metric rings to upgrade to forged. Otherwise you are looking at that $200 vs. $500 for really good pistons PLUS another $125 for some good thin rings. It's worth it to spend an extra $150 for insurance, but and extra $400+ is rough when you aren't building a race engine.

Not saying there are not better piston choices, but this same basic flattop/4 eyebrow forging has been used for 50 years in 350's. Before that the same design was used in the shorter stroke 327's just with a compression distance (pin height) and therefore a heavier piston....and people spin the hell outta those.
Old 01-17-2011, 02:12 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I run those pistons in my 355. No issues at all.
Old 01-17-2011, 02:29 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (246)
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago/Crown point
Posts: 4,987
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would get a custom cam for sure....the 306 works but you can find one used for roughly 200 shipped. You will get 10s on spray if you know what your doing! You will also run 12s on motor. Its hard to reach 10s on spray, BUT if you have the right kit, know how you can achieve that or else you will have a 11 sec ride all day. I like the build you have although its on a budget. Others will hate on it and tell you that you should go better. Not everyone has money to achieve great power.
Old 01-17-2011, 02:37 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
green96ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robsquikz28
I would get a custom cam for sure....the 306 works but you can find one used for roughly 200 shipped. You will get 10s on spray if you know what your doing! You will also run 12s on motor. Its hard to reach 10s on spray, BUT if you have the right kit, know how you can achieve that or else you will have a 11 sec ride all day. I like the build you have although its on a budget. Others will hate on it and tell you that you should go better. Not everyone has money to achieve great power.
If I run 12s with a cc306 and le1 heads with 373s and a 3200 stall I will part the car out. Its ran 12.5 with a 2500 stall and cc503 only
Old 01-17-2011, 02:42 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

If you're set on the cc306 put 1.7s on the intake side, and spray the **** out of it.
Old 01-17-2011, 02:43 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (246)
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago/Crown point
Posts: 4,987
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
if you're set on the cc306 put 1.7s on the intake side, and spray the **** out of it.
fo sho :d
Old 01-17-2011, 03:08 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
green96ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robsquikz28
fo sho :d
Please explain why I would want the 1.7s. And how much spray would you reccomend on the stock crank? 200? That would put the flywheel HP in the area of 650-700.
Old 01-17-2011, 03:10 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by green96ta
If I run 12s with a cc306 and le1 heads with 373s and a 3200 stall I will part the car out. Its ran 12.5 with a 2500 stall and cc503 only

Keep the 503 cam, put the money saved on the cam into good heads which will let the cam rev higher.
Old 01-17-2011, 03:18 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (246)
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago/Crown point
Posts: 4,987
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Keep the 503 cam, put the money saved on the cam into good heads which will let the cam rev higher.
very true in many ways. Idk how high you wanna rev, but that that 306 cam will and can rev to 6700 even with the engine parts you have. So it will make more power than the 503 but its up to you on what you wanna do
Old 01-17-2011, 03:25 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by green96ta
Please explain why I would want the 1.7s. And how much spray would you reccomend on the stock crank? 200? That would put the flywheel HP in the area of 650-700.

More lift...

200 should be fine on the crank if the rest of the engine is well put together.


Quick Reply: New engne build. Let me know what you think...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.