375hp? +/-
#1
375hp? +/-
Rebuilt stock bore LT1, (deleted egr, smog, cats) Pacesetter LT w/Y-pipe, Crane 227 cam, LE1 budget heads, 1.6rr, 918 springs, mail tune (lt1pcmtuning) and 3600 stall. Just trying to get baseline numbers. **Yes, sorry, 94 Z28, A4, 3600 stall, 3.23 gears. I am asking for crank HP #'s @ sea level, **
Getting back on putting the Camaro back together after 2 years in the corner of the garage. I'm between spray or boost but base numbers will be needed for my decision. The Engine Shop said 410-420 but I thought that was very high.
Getting back on putting the Camaro back together after 2 years in the corner of the garage. I'm between spray or boost but base numbers will be needed for my decision. The Engine Shop said 410-420 but I thought that was very high.
Last edited by fuzzyjk; 01-27-2011 at 02:57 PM.
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Fanatic
Sell it, buy a Yank SS 3600. You'll appreciate your car a lot more.
#12
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: chats,ga
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well if it goes bad then 80% time its gona take ur tranny with it. The stall is 1 place u dont wana b cheap on. Ask me how i know lol. I bought a tci my 1st time. Needless to say the stall failed and i had buy new tranny.
#14
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
We have relatively little flywheel hp data, so few LT1s are tested that way and reported. That is why I answered in RWHP.
The 350+guesses are an uneducated pipe dream. It is possible to do over 420rwhp through an A4 with heads and cam which leads everyone to inflate their expectations. You are using an OLD torque cam with a low level head, there is no legitimate reason to think it will make a big HP number.
The 350+guesses are an uneducated pipe dream. It is possible to do over 420rwhp through an A4 with heads and cam which leads everyone to inflate their expectations. You are using an OLD torque cam with a low level head, there is no legitimate reason to think it will make a big HP number.
#15
We have relatively little flywheel hp data, so few LT1s are tested that way and reported. That is why I answered in RWHP.
The 350+guesses are an uneducated pipe dream. It is possible to do over 420rwhp through an A4 with heads and cam which leads everyone to inflate their expectations. You are using an OLD torque cam with a low level head, there is no legitimate reason to think it will make a big HP number.
The 350+guesses are an uneducated pipe dream. It is possible to do over 420rwhp through an A4 with heads and cam which leads everyone to inflate their expectations. You are using an OLD torque cam with a low level head, there is no legitimate reason to think it will make a big HP number.
385hp na + mp70 @ 7psi = 455rwhp. (perfect). Thank you
Last edited by fuzzyjk; 01-28-2011 at 06:52 AM.
#16
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wild West
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know B&M isn't popular on the late model forums, but alot of my buddies have run them over the years deep into the 11's. Granted that was in TH350/TH400 cars, but for free vs a pricey Yank I think it's a decent choice. Even seen a few cheap Midwest converters perform well for the money in 4L60's.
Free vs $850+ IMO, depends on how much you want your wallet to burn. I'm not saying B&M is my first choice, or third, or sixth, but I'm not sure a expensive Yank is what you need to meet your goals. Perhaps sell the B&M and look into Edge which is a good middle ground.
I'm going to agree with MGR on that cam with ported heads, I can't say a 210 intake duration is what I'd be sticking in there...
-Dustin-
Free vs $850+ IMO, depends on how much you want your wallet to burn. I'm not saying B&M is my first choice, or third, or sixth, but I'm not sure a expensive Yank is what you need to meet your goals. Perhaps sell the B&M and look into Edge which is a good middle ground.
I'm going to agree with MGR on that cam with ported heads, I can't say a 210 intake duration is what I'd be sticking in there...
-Dustin-
#19
TECH Fanatic
I know B&M isn't popular on the late model forums, but alot of my buddies have run them over the years deep into the 11's. Granted that was in TH350/TH400 cars, but for free vs a pricey Yank I think it's a decent choice. Even seen a few cheap Midwest converters perform well for the money in 4L60's.
Free vs $850+ IMO, depends on how much you want your wallet to burn. I'm not saying B&M is my first choice, or third, or sixth, but I'm not sure a expensive Yank is what you need to meet your goals. Perhaps sell the B&M and look into Edge which is a good middle ground.
I'm going to agree with MGR on that cam with ported heads, I can't say a 210 intake duration is what I'd be sticking in there...
-Dustin-
Free vs $850+ IMO, depends on how much you want your wallet to burn. I'm not saying B&M is my first choice, or third, or sixth, but I'm not sure a expensive Yank is what you need to meet your goals. Perhaps sell the B&M and look into Edge which is a good middle ground.
I'm going to agree with MGR on that cam with ported heads, I can't say a 210 intake duration is what I'd be sticking in there...
-Dustin-
#20
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wild West
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
-Dustin-