Quick question on LE "306" vs CC306
#1
Quick question on LE "306" vs CC306
Well got a cam spec'd for the motor I'm getting
230/244 .598/.608 110 LSA 286/300 adv duration
vs the CC306
230/244 541/.573 112 LSA 290/307 adv duration
What will the differences be between these two? I'm learning with the whole cam thing but I told him I didn't want it bleeding out compression and guess that cam he spec'd will stop that??? that and what is going to vary from a 110 LSA from a 112???
230/244 .598/.608 110 LSA 286/300 adv duration
vs the CC306
230/244 541/.573 112 LSA 290/307 adv duration
What will the differences be between these two? I'm learning with the whole cam thing but I told him I didn't want it bleeding out compression and guess that cam he spec'd will stop that??? that and what is going to vary from a 110 LSA from a 112???
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The LE would be my choice if it was between those two. It has a little faster ramp rates which will help in not "bleeding" down compression. But with most cams you lose Dynamic compression down low to gain it up higher. The 110 lsa is gonna make it pull hard through the mid and higher rpms much faster than the 112 lsa. The tighter lsa of the LE will hurt the nitrous just a tad compared to the CC306. Nothing to worry about but it still does.
#14
Lloyd picks his lobes and event timing for specific reasons.
I see no reason to pick something generic when the man is offering you custom service for free.
If the 306 was the best choice, that's what he would have told you to buy.
As for my thoughts on the 306, it's an old grind with old lobes.
It does put down impressive peak numbers, which are useful for bragging and bench racing ... that's about it.
Here's some reading on LSA; they do a good job explaining what impact you can expect.
http://www.nightrider.com/biketech/camlsatable.htm
I see no reason to pick something generic when the man is offering you custom service for free.
If the 306 was the best choice, that's what he would have told you to buy.
As for my thoughts on the 306, it's an old grind with old lobes.
It does put down impressive peak numbers, which are useful for bragging and bench racing ... that's about it.
Here's some reading on LSA; they do a good job explaining what impact you can expect.
http://www.nightrider.com/biketech/camlsatable.htm
#15
Lloyd picks his lobes and event timing for specific reasons.
The cams listed on his site are examples that fit popular setups.
For the same price, he'll spec you a cam that fits your specific needs.
I see no reason to pick something generic when the man is offering you custom service for free.
As for the 306, it's an old grind with old lobes.
It does put down impressive peak numbers, which are useful for bragging and bench racing ... that's about it.
The cams listed on his site are examples that fit popular setups.
For the same price, he'll spec you a cam that fits your specific needs.
I see no reason to pick something generic when the man is offering you custom service for free.
As for the 306, it's an old grind with old lobes.
It does put down impressive peak numbers, which are useful for bragging and bench racing ... that's about it.
He told me thats for my set up and what im trying to do said that due to the event timing the compression will not bleed out and won't result in power loss. that and upped Lift numbers and different LSA should change it from the "CC306"
#18
Well not looking for some huge jump in power....The cam Llyod spec'd doesn't bleed out compression which if you bleed out compression you lose power. I figured pairing the cam with bumped up compression there will be some nice gains......Motors out why not do it while its out kinda thing ya know