LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Anyone do a IAT sensor relocation? Looking for pictures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2011, 11:23 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
02v8ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: south jersey
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Anyone do a IAT sensor relocation? Looking for pictures

Can i see someones set up and how you did it? Thinking about it.
Would you just block off the stock location and make your own new one? The intake isn't going to be stock much longer either.
Old 06-12-2011, 07:05 AM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I drilled a hole, installed a grommet, installed the sensor in the plastic CAI tube down closer to the filter. I then extended the wire harness so it would reach. I then put a second IAT sensor in the original location obviously unplugged.
Old 06-12-2011, 07:32 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
trilkb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Received 77 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

ill ask the stupid question, why would you want too? I thought the IAT had to be post MAF?
Old 06-12-2011, 11:16 AM
  #4  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
02v8ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: south jersey
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wrd1972
I drilled a hole, installed a grommet, installed the sensor in the plastic CAI tube down closer to the filter. I then extended the wire harness so it would reach. I then put a second IAT sensor in the original location obviously unplugged.
Thanks, are you just running a CAI or a lid or...

Originally Posted by trilkb
ill ask the stupid question, why would you want too? I thought the IAT had to be post MAF?
I'm still researching it but it supposedly gives a more accurate reading if you do this. Being closer to the filter, not getting heat soaked from the engine bay.
Old 06-13-2011, 06:00 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
 
hoursetraitor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: lynnwood,wa
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02v8ta
Thanks, are you just running a CAI or a lid or...


I'm still researching it but it supposedly gives a more accurate reading if you do this. Being closer to the filter, not getting heat soaked from the engine bay.
makes sense to me. use datamaster and try both locations and see if you get much differant of a reading or not and then you will know if its worth anything
Old 06-13-2011, 07:31 AM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I have a K&N FIPK CAI. The datamaster absolutely confirms that the IAT temps are much more accurate when relocated to to the CAI as opposed to the stock location.
Old 06-13-2011, 10:51 AM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

How would the sensor get heat soaked? Even under part throttle it has more than 1 cubic foot/sec of air moving past the sensor, which has a plastic body. Being that the PCM uses the IAT input to control fueling and spark, I'd like it as close to what the engine is actually seeing vs what we would want it to be. Relocating the sensor to see IAT at the filter will produce more consistent but not necessarily accurate readings.
Old 06-13-2011, 12:44 PM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Cant speak to the physics of air, its above my pay grade.

But I can say this. With a motor at full operating temps last week when the outdoor temps were in the mid 90's, with the IAT sensor in the CAI near the filter, the scanmaster said 102 degrees while the motor was at idle. Turned the motor off, switched the harness to the sensor in the elbow and it said 118 degrees.

If I turn the motor off and restart it in 5 minutes, the reading with the sensor in the elbow is consistently much higher at restart as opposed to the sensor in the CAI.

What does all this really mean? Hell if I know!
Old 06-13-2011, 01:12 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That tells me your engine isn't seeing ambient air temperature, and your sensor reflects that.
Old 06-13-2011, 04:14 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Gojira94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Clayton, NC
Posts: 1,197
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
How would the sensor get heat soaked? Even under part throttle it has more than 1 cubic foot/sec of air moving past the sensor, which has a plastic body. Being that the PCM uses the IAT input to control fueling and spark, I'd like it as close to what the engine is actually seeing vs what we would want it to be. Relocating the sensor to see IAT at the filter will produce more consistent but not necessarily accurate readings.
If the PCM sees air that is cooler than what it actually is at the intake, won't it fatten the mixture a tad and give you an artificially rich condition (slightly)?
Old 06-13-2011, 04:54 PM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

something like that yes
Old 06-13-2011, 07:15 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
trilkb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Received 77 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

thats what i was thinking, i just figured the air directly outside of the throttle body is what gets sucked in, so wouldnt you want the computer to give you the correct fuel mixture and spark timing to burn THAT air, rather then the air thats 3 feet outside of the engine that will be getting warmed up anyways?



Quick Reply: Anyone do a IAT sensor relocation? Looking for pictures



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.