LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

can the stock crank handle 450rwhp N/A?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2012, 10:31 PM
  #1  
duh
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
duh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: burbs of chi-town
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default can the stock crank handle 450rwhp N/A?

So I've noticed the car burning some oil lately....nothing major, but enough to convince the wife to put the money away while we can so I can redo the engine. The nice thing is I have a couple of blocks, a complete rotating assembly and a set of heads laying around. So I'm thinking of doing a "fun" 355 to replace it.

Srp Forged slugs .030 over with a 1" compression height

Scat H-beams in 6.125" length

A set of AI or LE heads and cam.

The goal is to not spin north of 7K rpm and have it be dead reliable (car is a DD and will be for the foreseeable future)

The main question is, if I do this and later on decide to spray it for some fun, am I going to regret not going with bigger cubes and a forged crank?

Currently the idea is to keep it N/A, but if I really don't like the power output, I'm going to do what I need to. The rods should handle anything I throw at it since they are the 7/16ths ARP2000 cap screws. The pistons are 4032 alloy, so thy can handle some spray, but not the world that some want to throw t some engines. I figure with swapping to a 95 or LSx pcm should cover the electronics. The only real issue would be the stock trans (definitly needs a converter and at least a shift kit) and stock rear.

What do you guys think? Am I off base completely or does this sound reasonable...
Old 02-18-2012, 10:32 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I would have no problem using the stock crank with double your goals.
Old 02-18-2012, 10:36 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
JUSTINSWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whaf he said i have 475 n/a and am fine i will tell you if it blows up.
Old 02-18-2012, 10:40 PM
  #4  
duh
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
duh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: burbs of chi-town
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So if 450rwhp seems like a low hope, what do you guys think I can safely push...

The nice thing is the car is a DD, but it literally drives a mile every other day. I'm going to keep it HR since I don't feel like spending the coin to go SR.

So the question is what should my rwhp goal be?
Old 02-18-2012, 11:01 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Rob94hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,662
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I've got ~425 at the wheels and daily drive it. Stock bottom with ARP mains and rod bolts. So yes would be your answer.
Old 02-19-2012, 02:16 AM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Easily yes.
Old 02-19-2012, 07:30 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Limiting revs to 7000, and with an A4, I think 450 rwhp with a HR is a touch on the optimistic side for a 355. Yes, you can do it, but your power peak is going to be so close to 7000 that you'll be shifting just as it peaks, instead of past peak which is what the car needs for best performance.
Targeting your peak at 6400-6500 rpm is more realistic, and the car will be quicker. Give that plan to AI or LE, and if you do everything right on your end, you'll be happy. That's what I did and ended up with 425 SAE rw.

The stock crank will hold that plus a 150 shot, no problem.
Old 02-19-2012, 12:46 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
 
wht97ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kinston North Carolina
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Something worth mentioning is your 1" compression height and 6.125 rods is going to put the pistons .160 in the hole with a 9.025 block and 3.48 stroke. You would have to put a 3.75 stroke in it for that combination to work.
Old 02-19-2012, 01:27 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
WS Sick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was wondering about that as well, did you mean to put 1 inch or what was your intention?
Old 02-19-2012, 02:08 PM
  #10  
duh
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
duh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: burbs of chi-town
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I plan on having the block 0 decked. It's also going to need the mains worked on a bit, so it leaves me enough room to play. According to SRP it's intended for a 8.99" deck height I figure with the little bit of main work, and then decking the block I'll have a 0" deck clearance, with a .040" MLS head gasket and 52cc heads puts it at 12.5:1 compression, with good squish. As far as I can tell it should make for a fairly efficient engine.

Edit: I was wrong it's a 1.125" compression height piston. and compression is right about 12.125

Last edited by duh; 02-19-2012 at 03:15 PM.
Old 02-19-2012, 03:52 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
wht97ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kinston North Carolina
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Ok that makes since now. Alighn honing the mains will do very little to affect deck height if unless you really go overboard with it. If you were to cut the caps .003 and open the housing bore back to spec youve only moved the crank towards the top by .0015. The piston probably wouldnt see anymore than half of that, which rounded up leaves you with a mere 8 tenths of a thousandts difference. In a nutshell dont expect to get .010 from alighn honing the mains.
Old 02-19-2012, 05:27 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
97Z28SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,290
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Personally I'd spend the extra $550-$600 and get a forged crank and stroke it while I'm at it and know that the bottom end can handle whatever I decide to throw at it later. I'd also put billet 4 bolt main caps on while I was at it, but that's just me.
Old 02-19-2012, 08:23 PM
  #13  
duh
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
duh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: burbs of chi-town
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That's what I was debating about. Would it be worth it to save some money on rods and pistons since they will be more common parts and throw a stroker crank and possibly make more power. The only real issue then would be spending twice as much in the heads since I wont be using stock castings. Urgh! Too many decisions to make!!!
Old 02-19-2012, 10:22 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
BADHAWK51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You can make the stock casting heads work fine. Larry from Speed went 10.67 I think with stock castings HR cam. pm him to see who did the porting.
Old 02-19-2012, 10:33 PM
  #15  
duh
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
duh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: burbs of chi-town
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Jeff, you have a PM. And what's you take? Stroke it or not?
Old 02-19-2012, 10:51 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
BADHAWK51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Chris, since your on a tight budget I would spend the money on the topend.

PM replied.
Old 02-20-2012, 07:51 AM
  #17  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
quik95lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

to answer your original ? 450 N/A is NO ISSUE AT ALL on a stock crank I wouldn't be afraid to go even 50% more on it .........
Old 02-20-2012, 09:12 AM
  #18  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
 
za355tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dfw
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I've heard of guts pushing 700 plus and guys going 9's on the stock crank. It's a good peice.
Old 02-20-2012, 06:02 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
BADHAWK51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by quik95lt1
to answer your original ? 450 N/A is NO ISSUE AT ALL on a stock crank I wouldn't be afraid to go even 50% more on it .........


I agree Mike, no issues at that level at all.



Quick Reply: can the stock crank handle 450rwhp N/A?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.