LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Quench question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2014, 02:51 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mhslax6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Quench question

Trying to learn all of the things I need to know (and do) when putting my engine back together after rebuild. I have been reading and see that optimal quench (after gasket) is the in mid .030" and that stock was .067-.069". Mine look to be in the hole .15-.20. Does that look right? You can see the oil residue on the cylinder walls where the piston stopped travel.
Attached Thumbnails Quench question-photo-4-7-.jpg   Quench question-photo-4-8-.jpg  
Old 08-11-2014, 05:53 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
93Z2871805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

IIRC stock CH pistons are 1.55, so 3.48/2 = 1.74 + 5.7 + 1.55 = 8.99. 9.025 - 8.99 = .035 in the hole stock. So with a .051 gasket, you're at .086 stock quench (Impalla SS is .063). .035 quench is about the tightest I'd go (.040 if you're running a decent size N2O shot).
Old 08-11-2014, 06:15 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mhslax6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm actually rebuilding it and doing forged rods and pistons. I was just curious why my stock pistons sat down in the hole lower than what I had read. Basically about 1/8".
Old 08-11-2014, 06:25 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
lt1-xjs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: centerville, ohio
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mhslax6
I'm actually rebuilding it and doing forged rods and pistons. I was just curious why my stock pistons sat down in the hole lower than what I had read. Basically about 1/8".
That line at the top is from the top ring not the piston.
Old 08-11-2014, 06:26 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
 
fleetmgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mhslax6
Mine look to be in the hole .15-.20. Does that look right? You can see the oil residue on the cylinder walls where the piston stopped travel.
If you think you can guess that by eyeball, you're daydreaming.
Old 08-11-2014, 06:39 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mhslax6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok thanks for the info, I thought that we had 1 and 6 completely at the top of the stroke when these pictures were taken. Just looking for info since I didn't know for sure. The car was supercharged, so I didn't know if when they had it torn down they changed compression. Thanks again!
Attached Thumbnails Quench question-photo-1-23-.jpg   Quench question-photo-3-8-.jpg  
Old 08-11-2014, 08:18 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
 
hrcslam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 2,610
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I calculated my quench based on my stroke, connecting rod length, and piston compression height difference from the deck height (like the formula above) plus had gasket difference. But, mine was easy I had my block zero decked. Then I got a .045" head gasket (was shooting for .035" but ordered the wrong gasket).

I verified the quench during PTV clearance checks (the same way I did the PTV checks) and found the actual quench to be .043" So either the gasket compressed more than rated or the pistons are out of the hole a little bit.

This is all to say, the stock deck height on an LT1 is 9.025" (supposedly anyway, this can actually change from block to block slightly and even from the front of the block to the back -have the engine decked!). So if you get 1.560" Compression height pistons, 3.48" stroke, and 5.7" rods you'll be "in the hole" .025 inches, theoretically. But this can be measure with depth gauges and compressed head gasket thickness, or the same way you do a PTV check (clay or playdough).
Old 08-11-2014, 08:24 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 2,969
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Best way I could imagine measuring depth would be using the top surface as zero and using either a depth mike or dial indicator to the top of the piston. Then again I'm not an automotive machinist
Old 08-11-2014, 08:26 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
 
hrcslam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 2,610
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mhslax6
Ok thanks for the info, I thought that we had 1 and 6 completely at the top of the stroke when these pictures were taken. Just looking for info since I didn't know for sure. The car was supercharged, so I didn't know if when they had it torn down they changed compression. Thanks again!
If that is top dead center, wow, them some shallow pistons!

That could be done with 6" rods and 1.125" compression height pistons. It'd give a HUGE quench of .160", detonation wouldn't be an issue though. And it would love boost. Although efficiency would be out the window.
Old 08-11-2014, 09:09 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mhslax6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We pulled the engine apart so I can't check anything now. I was positive the pictures I had were at TDC for 1 and 6, thats the only reason I asked. We had been comparing TDC with cam dowel position and I thought we left it there. I was obviously wrong. Just wondered if they did something to it since it had a T-Trim SC and it was stamped "race" on ID plate. Thanks again, just trying to learn this stuff.
Old 08-12-2014, 06:55 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
moehorsepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by myltwon
Best way I could imagine measuring depth would be using the top surface as zero and using either a depth mike or dial indicator to the top of the piston. Then again I'm not an automotive machinist
You're no machinist but you are correct, taking stroke, and rod length and decking to me is also a shot in the dark due to tolerances that are given for each, if you have the motor apart why not just use the proper tools and gauge it...
Old 08-12-2014, 05:07 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

You can ballpark it with a straight edge and feeler gauge even.
Old 08-12-2014, 06:21 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
mhslax6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is my first rebuild, so thanks for the advice. Getting a lot of good info here! Already have the pistons, rods and crank out so I'll know what I need to do for the build.
Old 08-12-2014, 06:29 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 2,969
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by moehorsepower
You're no machinist but you are correct, taking stroke, and rod length and decking to me is also a shot in the dark due to tolerances that are given for each, if you have the motor apart why not just use the proper tools and gauge it...
+/- 0.005 or even 0.002 adds up to outside the desired number range when all of them are on the high or low end.
Old 08-13-2014, 06:42 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
moehorsepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by myltwon
+/- 0.005 or even 0.002 adds up to outside the desired number range when all of them are on the high or low end.
Exactly..



Quick Reply: Quench question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.