LT-1 Power!
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LT-1 Power!
I just wanted to know the difference between power ranging as far as from a LT-4 hotcam vs LT-1 LE1 Heads? Just wanna know the pros and cons to both. I am on a budget as well. Thank you for your help.
#2
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
The LT4 hotcam is an ok cam if you're not really looking for big power...although there are much worse cams. Ramps are a little lazy. The CC503 cam is probably the best cam for a street car, easy to tune since a bunch of people run them and tuners have been tuning them for years. My old man has a 94 Firehawk with LE1 heads and a CC503 and it runs hard. He's got all the supporting mods too though.
There is probably 15-20 hp difference between the two cams above...Lloyds version makes about 10-12 hp more than a CC503 and doesnt cost much more. AI also has some excellent grinds but they do cost a little more.
What's your budget and what mods do you currently have?
There is probably 15-20 hp difference between the two cams above...Lloyds version makes about 10-12 hp more than a CC503 and doesnt cost much more. AI also has some excellent grinds but they do cost a little more.
What's your budget and what mods do you currently have?
#4
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The LT4 hotcam is an ok cam if you're not really looking for big power...although there are much worse cams. Ramps are a little lazy. The CC503 cam is probably the best cam for a street car, easy to tune since a bunch of people run them and tuners have been tuning them for years. My old man has a 94 Firehawk with LE1 heads and a CC503 and it runs hard. He's got all the supporting mods too though.
There is probably 15-20 hp difference between the two cams above...Lloyds version makes about 10-12 hp more than a CC503 and doesnt cost much more. AI also has some excellent grinds but they do cost a little more.
What's your budget and what mods do you currently have?
There is probably 15-20 hp difference between the two cams above...Lloyds version makes about 10-12 hp more than a CC503 and doesnt cost much more. AI also has some excellent grinds but they do cost a little more.
What's your budget and what mods do you currently have?
#5
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
And why would you choose a hotcam when for $40 more you can have a superior grind in the CC503?
Have you ever posted without insulting people? Why do you choose to live your life like that?
Last edited by za355tx; 09-17-2014 at 12:29 PM.
#7
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Your asking about the difference in power between a hotcam with stock heads vs LE1 heads with a stock cam? The stock cam is the bigger limiting factor than the stock heads, doing heads on the stock cam will yield close to nothing, but doing a cam on stock heads can give you up to 70rwhp (hotcam closer to 30). I think you need to slow down and do a lot of research before you break out your wallet and regret a purchase.
Trending Topics
#8
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
I did this very thing with LPE ported heads on the stock block. Ran it at Texas Motorplex many times and stock the car went 13.9@100mph. With LPE ported heads/intake, 1.6 rockers and Edelbrock shorties going into the stock y-pipe with cats still in place the car went 13.2 @ 106. The car dynoed 282/300 stock. With heads it was at 310/310. Power and torque curve had exact characteristics of stock, only higher. I can't believe for a second the 6mph improvement through the traps was caused by crap Edelbrock shorty headers backed into the stock cats and 1.6 rockers. Problem is there isn't a whole lot of data to back this up since it's cheaper to do a cam, therefore most everyone who started modding these cars would do a cam first.
#10
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
With the cats and stock y-pipe? Not a chance. It was widely known soon after that those shorties were useless. The collectors were the same diameter as stock. It was a gadget, but back then that's all that was available for OBDII. With just rockers/supporting mods it has been well documented it's good for maybe a .10th and perhaps 1mph. I am not sure if that is with or without cats/headers/stock exhaust/etc. Remember, I was running the stock cats and y-pipe with those junk headers. What I wonder is how well the car would have done with a good set of headers and ORY. When I did the cam install (LPE 211/219) I ran 12.5 @ 110. Once Hooker LT's became available I put those on along with a shitty non-mandrel bent y-pipe that skeeter welded up for me and ran a 12.2 @ 114. Then put 3.73 gears in to replace the 4.10's and ran 12.0 @ 115.
#11
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
LE says to go with a 227/235 .565/.579 110 LSAcam.... it gives tons of mid range power and raises the red line to 6300. This will provide a choppy idle also.
With this, you'd need RRs, pushrods, a tune, and probably a chain, etc.
How does the LT4 hot cam stand up to this?
With this, you'd need RRs, pushrods, a tune, and probably a chain, etc.
How does the LT4 hot cam stand up to this?
#13
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
That cam is more aggressive than a LT4 therefore, in theory, it should have a stronger output. The hotcam is a very close profile to one of the cams suggested with the le1 heads.
Typical response. Whenever there's a counterpoint the butt hurt claim it's trolling.
Typical response. Whenever there's a counterpoint the butt hurt claim it's trolling.
Last edited by SS RRR; 09-19-2014 at 03:57 AM.
#15
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
SS RRR is right on the money with LT1 knowledge.
IMO, You really don't need a giant cam to go fast. I mild cam will do better on a street set-up because the power is more in the mid range where your rpm is most of the time anyways. Your car is in the 3500-6000 rpm range most of the time when getting on the gas so if it makes 500 hp at 6400 whoop de due because you are only at that rpm for a quick moment before you shift. into the next gear.
IMO, You really don't need a giant cam to go fast. I mild cam will do better on a street set-up because the power is more in the mid range where your rpm is most of the time anyways. Your car is in the 3500-6000 rpm range most of the time when getting on the gas so if it makes 500 hp at 6400 whoop de due because you are only at that rpm for a quick moment before you shift. into the next gear.
#16
Launching!
it's been since the 90's to now. What I said is not a direct slam at you. This "lazy lobe" bullshit has been around awhile,
Lazy lobes, to me mean stuff from the sixtys maybe early 70s
You can still get a little more aggressive with great results and longevity of valvetrain. Ive done the real aggressive ramp thing and all it did was wear out the valvetrain prematurely..all of it. Some guys like them to each their own. Not worth a few lbs of torque and a touch of vacuum;I could never feel the performance gain.
#17
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
The CC306 and hotcam grinds have been around a long time, before the GenII LT1 was around. All I am trying to say is comparable cams to both the 306 and hotcam aren't doing anything any more astounding than what was done years prior.