New Dyno Run after Cam and Rockers
11-30-2016, 09:18 PM
#26
OK, so here are some photos I took of the Dyno runs. Once again, the RPM Clamp is broke, so what this sheet shows for the torque numbers is the power multiplied through the entire drivetrain. The run was SAE corrected, in a couple of the photos it shows the difference in runs without the cam, springs and rockers
Edit: printer is dead and they're waiting for approval to buy a new one
Edit: printer is dead and they're waiting for approval to buy a new one
12-05-2016, 10:55 AM
#30
And instead of having a mail order tune, Ill actually be able to get the car tuned on the dyno...
EDIT: As a side note, I am still extremely happy with my mail order tune. And I want to thank Keith at PCMforless for all his help. Car runs excellent.
12-11-2016, 06:16 PM
#32
Thank you, surprisingly a friend at work had to take a Auto 2012 Camaro SS for a test drive after doing some repairs on a internal RO (car is owned by the dealership) I was surprised when he got back and told me he was not impressed when comparing it to my car. He's never driven my car except around the lot. But i have taken him out to a couple of open track days on the road course as well as an empty back road once or twice.
12-13-2016, 08:28 PM
#34
No, the RPM Clamp is broke. The WTQ number are everything multiplied throughout the entire drive train at peak HP. There is a mathematical formula to calculate a accurate WTQ number to match the WHP numbers from the numbers provided. I forget what the heck it is though. Mainly, the WHP number is whats being looked at. They're working on getting a replacement clamp. The dyno time is free, but by the time the clamp is replaced ill be long gone.
12-13-2016, 09:58 PM
#35
HP = torque * rpm /5250. Either way there's no way it made over 500 lbft to the tires, something is off. If you look at it from a before vs after, the gain is great, and about what would be expected. I wouldn't put much stock in the actual numbers. Take it to the track!
Quick hand calc assuming a 27" tire, at 103 the lines should cross at 5250 rpm, which it doesn't on the graph, so I say the graph is fubar.
Quick hand calc assuming a 27" tire, at 103 the lines should cross at 5250 rpm, which it doesn't on the graph, so I say the graph is fubar.
Last edited by bufmatmuslepants; 12-13-2016 at 10:20 PM.
12-15-2016, 10:40 AM
#36
HP = torque * rpm /5250. Either way there's no way it made over 500 lbft to the tires, something is off. If you look at it from a before vs after, the gain is great, and about what would be expected. I wouldn't put much stock in the actual numbers. Take it to the track!
Quick hand calc assuming a 27" tire, at 103 the lines should cross at 5250 rpm, which it doesn't on the graph, so I say the graph is fubar.
Quick hand calc assuming a 27" tire, at 103 the lines should cross at 5250 rpm, which it doesn't on the graph, so I say the graph is fubar.