LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Ported TB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2006, 08:44 AM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
mikes98z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Ported TB

Has anone ever tried one of these? Seems like the guy has a good reputation and you get back $40 for your core. Curious if you would see any gains.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/52mm-...64031684QQrdZ1
Old 05-12-2006, 08:00 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
 
1SlowFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Linn, Oregon
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Yeah, Matt is cool and does great work... I haven't gotten mine yet, but will be getting it from him soon. He has a lot of guys on camaroz28 running them without complaint...
Old 05-14-2006, 01:21 AM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

ya, the way i see it, a 52mm hole is a 52mm hole no matter who makes / modifyes it. Stock bored to a 52/58 or SLP, ACCEL etc. etc. id say save the xtra couple hundred bucks and invest it into something else and in turn have a better hp gain with a bored stock AND lets say underdrive pully and plugs.................all for the same price of a aftermarket b.s. thats just my 2cents
Old 05-14-2006, 02:31 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
buffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

IMO if you're going with a 52mm you're better off with a stock rebored unit. No idle issues to deal with like on the aftermarket units. Besides Matt Blum's work is Kick ***. He also has powdercoated TBs and will make you custom top plates too. You may not see any gains on a stock or minor bolt on car, but some may argue a few pony gain on anything above 300rwhp.
Old 05-14-2006, 09:51 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,260
Received 59 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

From what I have read and seen on a dyno, a bigger TB is not really needed on a stock engine. You can invest that money somewhere else.
Old 05-14-2006, 10:02 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

i would agree MERV. Some people just have $$ to blow ya know.
Old 05-14-2006, 10:20 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,260
Received 59 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

Yup, the 502 MPFI Crate Engine that Chevy makes has a 48mm TB on it, ans that is still putting down near 500hp. Just throwing that out there....
Old 05-15-2006, 12:36 AM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
buffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^^ ehh that's thrown out more than people care to realize. I could argue it, but think about this. GM met it's target HP rating with the 48mm TB, an off the shelf product they already had made. Why do you think GM would produce a bigger TB if it already had one that could meet it's requirements

Also Note:

The LTx intake has a small plenum volume so a bigger throttle body is more helpful that it would be on a first generation SBC or BBC

From a close friend of mine

I gained 15 rwhp with my Hot Cammed 350 by switching from a 48mm to a 52mm TB.
More Food for thought:

You guys are forgetting that GM has other priorities than ultimate horsepower. The smaller throttle body bore makes for smoother part-throttle operation, as does twin bores instead of one bigger one. Remember, the 48mm throttle body was originally developed in the 1980's, when TPI came out and engine software wasn't nearly as good as it is today.

The reason the 48mm TB is on the 502 is the same reason the new solstice uses common parts: cost. They met their horsepower goal with an existing TB, so there was no need to develop another one. Notice GMPP doesn't offer fuel injection on their ZZ572 motors? It's not like they couldn't do it; but I seriously doubt they could make a cost-effective system for such small volume, relatively speaking. BTW, Scoggin-Dickey sells a fuel-injected version of the ZZ572:

Last edited by buffman; 05-15-2006 at 12:41 AM.
Old 05-15-2006, 01:01 AM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,260
Received 59 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

You guys picked up 15rwhp with a 52mm on a HOTCAM engine. I might have to look into that, and Bigger Heads I guess.
Old 05-15-2006, 09:31 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
mikes98z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks for the update guys...I am new to the LT engines so its a learning curve.

It is a stocker and a DD as of now.....just want to do some minor bolt ons such as a cat back, 1.6 RR's, and a CAI.

Mike



Quick Reply: Ported TB



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 PM.