Finally Time for a Cam! Which one?
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Finally Time for a Cam! Which one?
I'm thinking about adding a mild cam
what would be good for my set up?
2800 stall with a 3.73 rearend gear
90,000 miles, I have a set of 1.6 crane rr sitting around I can use
I may port the heads if I can get it done for fairly cheap
I am looking for a good all round cam thats good for nitrous, but will still give me a good boost for all motor runs.
Any suggestions
what would be good for my set up?
2800 stall with a 3.73 rearend gear
90,000 miles, I have a set of 1.6 crane rr sitting around I can use
I may port the heads if I can get it done for fairly cheap
I am looking for a good all round cam thats good for nitrous, but will still give me a good boost for all motor runs.
Any suggestions
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East of LA
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
226/230 530/550 /110 1.52RR (it's only a small shot) who cares!
xfi lobe!....lol....Comp.
well he asked....I gave him my idea......
xfi lobe!....lol....Comp.
well he asked....I gave him my idea......
Last edited by travie319; 01-05-2007 at 05:51 PM.
#5
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East of LA
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well Here It Is.......
My Cam: Pk/hp:321@6000 Pk/tq:332@4000 Ave. Hp./tq. (246hp/311tq)
Cc503: Pk/hp: 324@6000 Pk/tq: 331@4500 Ave. Hp./tq. (246hp/309tq)
On A Stock Bone Stock Fbody
My Cam: Pk/hp:321@6000 Pk/tq:332@4000 Ave. Hp./tq. (246hp/311tq)
Cc503: Pk/hp: 324@6000 Pk/tq: 331@4500 Ave. Hp./tq. (246hp/309tq)
On A Stock Bone Stock Fbody
#6
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The xfi lobes are more aggressive and designed for use with the 26918 comp springs. If you are going to get your heads ported, check into a custom H/C package if you can afford it. The ones from www.eportworks.com are very reasonably priced and he's had good results. Home porting can do more harm than good.
3015/3016 comp xfi maybe
I like the intake lobes more since they have more lift, but that's up to you.
224/230 .573/.576 112+4 LSA
I'm no expert and if you want max power and performance, you'll contact someone like bret bauer.
3015/3016 comp xfi maybe
I like the intake lobes more since they have more lift, but that's up to you.
224/230 .573/.576 112+4 LSA
I'm no expert and if you want max power and performance, you'll contact someone like bret bauer.
#7
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by travie319
226/230 530/550 /110 1.52RR (it's only a small shot) who cares!
xfi lobe!....lol....Comp.
well he asked....I gave him my idea......
xfi lobe!....lol....Comp.
well he asked....I gave him my idea......
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East of LA
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by travie319
Well Here It Is.......
My Cam: Pk/hp:321@6000 Pk/tq:332@4000 Ave. Hp./tq. (246hp/311tq)
Cc503: Pk/hp: 324@6000 Pk/tq: 331@4500 Ave. Hp./tq. (246hp/309tq)
On A Stock Bone Stock Fbody
My Cam: Pk/hp:321@6000 Pk/tq:332@4000 Ave. Hp./tq. (246hp/311tq)
Cc503: Pk/hp: 324@6000 Pk/tq: 331@4500 Ave. Hp./tq. (246hp/309tq)
On A Stock Bone Stock Fbody
AND I RAN THE CC503 W/1.6 RR
HP 355@6000/TQ 348@3500
Last edited by travie319; 01-05-2007 at 06:36 PM.
#15
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by travie319
I just graphed the 846 cam......and it looks almost identical to the 503
both winners in my book!
I would still buy the 503.....and rev it to 6200rpm
both winners in my book!
I would still buy the 503.....and rev it to 6200rpm
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East of LA
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Performance Trends
and I graphed the 846 cam...not the 847.....
it's actually this cam http://www.cranecams.com/index.php?s...31&lvl=2&prt=5
and I graphed the 846 cam...not the 847.....
it's actually this cam http://www.cranecams.com/index.php?s...31&lvl=2&prt=5
#19
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by travie319
Performance Trends
and I graphed the 846 cam...not the 847.....
it's actually this cam http://www.cranecams.com/index.php?s...31&lvl=2&prt=5
and I graphed the 846 cam...not the 847.....
it's actually this cam http://www.cranecams.com/index.php?s...31&lvl=2&prt=5