LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Anybody using the 26120 Beehive w/ hydraulic rollers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2007, 08:57 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
cdb95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Johnstown, PA
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Anybody using the 26120 Beehive w/ hydraulic rollers?

As title says..........
using these vs. the 26918 beehives, more load, any long term effects on the HR lifters?
Thanks!

BTW, I`m going to use the new GM Racing CTS-V Caddy lifter.
Old 03-22-2007, 09:53 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
seawolf06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I heard those were more for a BBC. They also seem to have less lift capability. Why do you need more pressure?
Old 03-22-2007, 10:04 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
cdb95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Johnstown, PA
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They are .590" max lift, 918s to .600"
I was told that these can be used for more agressive lobes.
Old 03-23-2007, 02:43 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
seawolf06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I tried looking at those, but my max lift was .585 which was too much and I think the rate might be less for those, which makes me think that the spring is just shorter.
Old 03-25-2007, 07:20 PM
  #5  
CNB
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
CNB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I use this spring on my set-up which is currently at .637 lift. This spring is very stout and tests out stronger then what Comp advertises. Here's a picture of the springs with my new motor.



Quick Reply: Anybody using the 26120 Beehive w/ hydraulic rollers?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.