FILPK or Ram air??
08-02-2007, 10:43 PM
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FILPK or Ram air?? I have a SS camaro with the ram air box sitting on top of the intake and K&N does not make a fliter for it so I still run it with a Napa "Gold". Would you ditch this in favor for a K&N FILPK or Moroso?
08-02-2007, 11:03 PM
#4
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cherry Point NC
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have an FIPK and I like it. BTW.....
I'm in aerodynamics class right now with a US navy tactical fighter squadron, and they have confirmed the myth that ram air on cars is pointless. Ram air doesn't reall net a power increase until you get over about 400mph.
I'm in aerodynamics class right now with a US navy tactical fighter squadron, and they have confirmed the myth that ram air on cars is pointless. Ram air doesn't reall net a power increase until you get over about 400mph.
08-02-2007, 11:07 PM
#5
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ive got an fipk.my car came with a moroso but the filter was nasty dirty so i just switched the whole intake.ive heard the moroso is pretty good though if you keep your filter clean. i noticed a big dif going to my fipk but i think it was mainly switching from a clogged air filter to a brand new one.
08-02-2007, 11:35 PM
#6
Originally Posted by LT Malice
I'm in aerodynamics class right now with a US navy tactical fighter squadron, and they have confirmed the myth that ram air on cars is pointless. Ram air doesn't reall net a power increase until you get over about 400mph.
Really?..Thats pretty cool man
