boxed shape vs tubular?
10-09-2007, 12:21 AM
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
boxed shape vs tubular? Someone was telling me that boxed shape suspension (no maker in particular) is a better design than tubular. Is this true? But isn't UMI tubular, and i've heard so many good things about UMI. That's why i question this.
10-09-2007, 12:32 AM
#2
I think it has way more to do with the specific design and how well they are put together than the shape of the tube.
10-10-2007, 11:05 AM
#4
If and when using the correct size material and when the item is designed correctly it doesn't on the material shape.
Tubular allows many more options then boxed tubing, such as bending and welding.
If you have any questions regarding our items please ask and I will be glad to help.
Thank you!
Ryan
Tubular allows many more options then boxed tubing, such as bending and welding.
If you have any questions regarding our items please ask and I will be glad to help.
Thank you!
Ryan
Last edited by UMI Performance; 10-10-2007 at 12:32 PM.
10-10-2007, 11:31 AM
#5
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bryant, AR
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i would also think tubular to be lighter than box...which is the whole point if you're getting a new k-member. i know if i had to swp my motor again, i'd be hitting up UMI for about 2K in parts. lol
10-10-2007, 12:21 PM
#6
TECH Fanatic
There are advantages to both round tubing ("tubular") and square or rectangular ("boxed") tubing in structures. For tension and compression loads like what you see in F-body rear lower arms, round is the most effective. You get the most strength for the least amount of material.
If there are primarily bending loads, you might do better with rectangular tubing with the long side opposing the load. It may also be easier to attach things like mounts, etc. to square or rectangular tubes.
As was mentioned, mandrel bending of round tubes is easier than mandrel bending square or rectangular...often a LOT easier.
As Ryan said: "If and when using the correct size material and when the item is designed correctly it doesn't matter." The quality of the design and fabrication is WAY more important than the shape of the tubing. Go with quality, not shape.
If there are primarily bending loads, you might do better with rectangular tubing with the long side opposing the load. It may also be easier to attach things like mounts, etc. to square or rectangular tubes.
As was mentioned, mandrel bending of round tubes is easier than mandrel bending square or rectangular...often a LOT easier.
As Ryan said: "If and when using the correct size material and when the item is designed correctly it doesn't matter." The quality of the design and fabrication is WAY more important than the shape of the tubing. Go with quality, not shape.
