LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

I want 350 hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2008, 12:08 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Dolla_Billz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I want 350 hp

I have a 97 trans am lt1 non ram air and I want 350 rwhp. I bought it with a cai and muffler and thats all it has still. How hard would it be for me to make 350 rwhp without spray? Where should I start?
Old 06-29-2008, 12:21 AM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

full boltons and a decent cam can get you there.
Old 06-29-2008, 12:50 AM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Dolla_Billz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh and its an m6 with 135,000 miles.

I am a good driver but the other day I got beat by a 2002 mustang gt. It was supposedly stock but he pulled a lot harder than any stock gt I've ever raced. Ive beat plenty of 05-newer gt's. Could my car need a tune up or can stock gt's of those models beat lt1's that bad?
Old 06-29-2008, 01:53 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (39)
 
porksoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 2,459
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

With that many miles I would only do bolt-ons because I just wouldn't risk the money on everything to make 350HP if the motor is toward the end of its life. I'm not saying yours will blow soon or anything since you never know when it will go, but with that many miles and if it's being raced I wouldn't risk it. At least if you do bolt-ons you could swap them over on a rebuild.
Old 06-29-2008, 02:05 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (41)
 
LS1Silverado05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would assume full bolt ons including Lontube Headers, and a cam will get you there no problem... But I am just coming out of an LS1 car, so I may still be over estimating. I dont know.
Old 06-29-2008, 02:28 AM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1Silverado05
I would assume full bolt ons including Lontube Headers, and a cam will get you there no problem... But I am just coming out of an LS1 car, so I may still be over estimating. I dont know.
You are correct, but it needs to be a decent sized cam, not small. With an LS1 a small cam would be all you would need.
Old 06-29-2008, 02:33 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (32)
 
jetlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southaven, MS (near Memphis, TN)
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

At a dyno day recently, a 95 6spd LT1 Camaro dynoed at 255rwhp...is that the norm for these cars?
Old 06-29-2008, 02:37 AM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jetlag
At a dyno day recently, a 95 6spd LT1 Camaro dynoed at 255rwhp...is that the norm for these cars?
That's about the norm for a bone stock auto. 6 speeds are usually a little higher, around 260-270 stock for them.

If the car was not stock, I'd say it probably has a few issues.
Old 06-29-2008, 05:29 AM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (8)
 
bigbadblack93z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Katy
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

my 93 dyno'ed 251rwhp/301rwtq w/ 52mm Holley TB, K&N FIPK, hypertech chip, flowmaster and pulleys. fresh NGK plugs and Accel wires, just to give an idea. it ran 14.00s
Old 06-29-2008, 06:35 AM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
 
1badzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SFL
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine dyno'd 337whp hotcam + bolt-ons with a slipping 700r4 (and stock stall)
Old 06-29-2008, 07:00 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
93z28_6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine dyno'd at 272whp and 315tq with just a choke master and running really rich... but i havent had it on the dyno yet with my new set up in sig.
Old 06-29-2008, 01:45 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
I8ASaleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N. Richland Hills
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I pulled 256hp and 306 tq, but that was with a miss and a whiney 10-bolt. I hope to be closer to 300rwhp with all the bolt-on's done.
Old 06-29-2008, 02:28 PM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
firehawk238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

my 95 firehawk M6 car just put down 350 rwhp and 338 rwtq. i use the LT4 hot cam which was installed along with a full top end package by MTI. my heads are 2.05/1.60s and are ported big time. 52mm TB, ported intake, JBA headers, underdrive pulleys, mcleod clutch. i am also running a 4.10 gear which will actually hurt your rwhp numbers. im losing about 21 to 22 percent in the driveline due to those gears. without gears id only lose about 15 to 18 percent. car runs exceptionally well though.
Old 06-29-2008, 04:24 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (41)
 
LS1Silverado05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I pretty much have all the bolt ons except an electric water pump, or TB.

I guess the electric water pump is always worth something..how about the TB?...Worth it on a bolt-on only car, or wait for a cam etc?

Sorry OP, didnt mean to...
Old 06-29-2008, 04:33 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by porksoda
With that many miles I would only do bolt-ons because I just wouldn't risk the money on everything to make 350HP if the motor is toward the end of its life. I'm not saying yours will blow soon or anything since you never know when it will go, but with that many miles and if it's being raced I wouldn't risk it. At least if you do bolt-ons you could swap them over on a rebuild.
Who says its at the end of its life? My LS1 had 120K and ran perfect!

if you have good compression and its a good running motor its going to be fine.
Old 06-29-2008, 04:33 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by firehawk238
my 95 firehawk M6 car just put down 350 rwhp and 338 rwtq. i use the LT4 hot cam which was installed along with a full top end package by MTI. my heads are 2.05/1.60s and are ported big time. 52mm TB, ported intake, JBA headers, underdrive pulleys, mcleod clutch. i am also running a 4.10 gear which will actually hurt your rwhp numbers. im losing about 21 to 22 percent in the driveline due to those gears. without gears id only lose about 15 to 18 percent. car runs exceptionally well though.
You have a head n cam LT1 and only made 350whp? Thats very weak
Old 06-29-2008, 04:43 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Bad_tx_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: St Petersburg Florida
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

hell just throw some juice on the beast!
Old 06-29-2008, 04:50 PM
  #18  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
94LT1Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slick1851
You have a head n cam LT1 and only made 350whp? Thats very weak
lt4 hotcam isnt that good....bang for buck...sure....but its small
Old 06-29-2008, 04:51 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
daves94formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i put down 362 RWHP and 398 RWTQ with what i have in my sig. And that is a cam only tune didnt have it done for the heads or the injectors. Oh and its a 2.73 geared A4
Old 06-30-2008, 02:45 PM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 94LT1Bird
lt4 hotcam isnt that good....bang for buck...sure....but its small
Im a hot cam hater, and I think its fucken junk and ive been saying it for years

But people like to play follow the retarded leaders on this forum


Quick Reply: I want 350 hp



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.