LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

alternative intake manifold?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2008, 12:14 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
hawk584's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,748
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default alternative intake manifold?

just wondering what other intake manifolds if any would work with ported and polished stock '95 LT1 heads? i have a turbo and looking to get Tim Talyor'ed..." more power " not anytime soon, just fishing for information is all
Old 09-12-2008, 01:41 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
slomarao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: chicago,IL
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lt4, single plane, Vic e, Sheetmetal(deep pockets).

Or you can cut up and weld the stock piece.
Old 09-12-2008, 06:16 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Worry about installing the turbo first. When you hit 1000 rwhp and that's not enough, then start worrying about the intake manifold.
Old 09-12-2008, 06:34 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Just to help you out substantially. The LT4 intake is internally the same as the LT1 intake.

Point being just because folks try to "help" does not mean they are helpful. There is MORE bad information shared on forums than good.

Lots of folks will tell you single plane is the ticket but it is really more of the current fad. Most of the guys I trust who have tried it have said it is not all that and not worth the hassle on the vast majority of cars. It takes a lot to earn my trust.

You will see a lot of mediocre single plane results being hyped as spectacular but if you pay attention you will see milder setups going faster with mildly worked LT1 intakes.

There are cases and applications where a single plane is a good choice, but most guys are too quick to jump on that bandwagon and then they use the wrong intake.
Old 09-12-2008, 06:40 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

If I had the money to dump into a single plane, I'd dump it into that one setup someone found here, that are essentially mini single barrel TBI units. Or EFI Velocity stacks, all depends how you look at it. The company even makes a fitting for boosted applications, and they have an Edel (I think it's Edel) cross-ram individual runner intake and their "TBIs" for I think it was $2500.

To be more serious, it all depends where you plan to go, and how much boost you plan to run. You'll really need your motor built up before you'll actually need a new intake. Now, even with 8lbs, a better intake would help, but only because it would offer more plenum space or longer runners. So not so much the stock intake becoming a restriction. Are you running single or twin turbos?
Old 09-12-2008, 07:20 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

96caprice is right.

The one and only "fair" back-to-back test I saw had the single plane out-performing the LT4 by about 15 rwhp, and that was on a very stout solid-roller AFR220 setup, and the gains were only above 6200 rpm. The single plane lost power below 5200 rpm.

With a turbo setup, you can gain or lose 100 hp by turbo selection alone. Also, you have more custom fab work and parts chasing to do than most want to, so adding in a single plane will multiply your troubles x2.

All that, and the LT1 intake has been proven beyond 1000 rwhp and down into the low 9's, high 8's. So, unless your goals are beyond that, don't worry with it. Quite frankly, if you're still fooling around with the LTx, then you're probably not shooting for 1000+ or 8's.

Mike
Old 09-12-2008, 08:05 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
thesoundandthefury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

TWM Induction Crossram EFI utilizing a "Mooneyes" base manifold:





Extrudabody Crossram EFI utilizing a Pierce base manifold:



Old 09-12-2008, 08:50 PM
  #8  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,149
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

^ ITBs are sick. I was going to make a manifold out of two sets of 2007 GSXR 750 throttle bodies. I bought them and then learned that they were way too small for what I wanted to do.
Old 09-12-2008, 08:56 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I adore the Extrudabody! I like it much more over the first one

Googled those TBs from the GSXR, yea those look only about 1-1/2" diameter each, MAYBE 2"
http://lander.tuning.cz/images/swiftkc/itb1.jpg
Old 09-12-2008, 10:01 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
hawk584's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,748
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

TWM Induction Crossram EFI utilizing a "Mooneyes" base manifold:



^^ would that even fit on an Lt1?
Old 09-12-2008, 10:02 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hawk584
TWM Induction Crossram EFI utilizing a "Mooneyes" base manifold:



^^ would that even fit on an Lt1?
Sure, would be like installing any other GEN I intake. A little work on the bolt holes and some other small bits (which I don't know).
Old 09-12-2008, 10:28 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
hawk584's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,748
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

looks angry that's for sure!
Old 09-12-2008, 10:32 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hawk584
looks angry that's for sure!
lol I think the word you're looking for is "mean"

I'd be happy to run that setup, even if by some odd chance I lost power Which DesktopDyno shows is the case. A drop back down to TPI HP and TBI TQ heh. I actually doubt that would be the case with it though.



Quick Reply: alternative intake manifold?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.