cts v t 56
#3
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
As Mike mentioned, those are the major parts needed. There's also a few little parts (VSS, offset lever, etc.) once you get into the re-assembly.
I did a full photo shot of a conversion here:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28...0813-CTSv-GTO/
Once done, you'll also need to use a large/extended pilot bearing in your crank, since the CTSv input shaft is 1/2" shorter to clear the dual-mass clutch setup of the LS6.
I did a full photo shot of a conversion here:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28...0813-CTSv-GTO/
Once done, you'll also need to use a large/extended pilot bearing in your crank, since the CTSv input shaft is 1/2" shorter to clear the dual-mass clutch setup of the LS6.
#4
FormerVendor
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As Mike mentioned, those are the major parts needed. There's also a few little parts (VSS, offset lever, etc.) once you get into the re-assembly.
I did a full photo shot of a conversion here:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28...0813-CTSv-GTO/
Once done, you'll also need to use a large/extended pilot bearing in your crank, since the CTSv input shaft is 1/2" shorter to clear the dual-mass clutch setup of the LS6.
I did a full photo shot of a conversion here:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28...0813-CTSv-GTO/
Once done, you'll also need to use a large/extended pilot bearing in your crank, since the CTSv input shaft is 1/2" shorter to clear the dual-mass clutch setup of the LS6.
#5
I know this is an old thread but I am not sure what I am missing here.
T56 tranny's are so hard to find. The ctsv stuff shows up sometimes. I want one for my chevelle. The shifter stuff I can live with.
If the big problem with the ctsv t56 is the lack of a slip yoke then why are we all going to all the trouble to change tail shafts and all. Wouldn't a Conversion plate like this
http://www.driveshaftshop.com/2004-2...nversion-plate
Paired with a spicer flange and 1350 or 1333 added to the front of the existing driveshaft do the trick for far less money? I have to cut my driveshaft anyway. please explain if this is wrong. It seems like a no brainier but maybe two u joints not sliding in and out is turning you guys off. School me please. Does travel require that much slip from the yoke?
Does this only work with a IRS setup?
T56 tranny's are so hard to find. The ctsv stuff shows up sometimes. I want one for my chevelle. The shifter stuff I can live with.
If the big problem with the ctsv t56 is the lack of a slip yoke then why are we all going to all the trouble to change tail shafts and all. Wouldn't a Conversion plate like this
http://www.driveshaftshop.com/2004-2...nversion-plate
Paired with a spicer flange and 1350 or 1333 added to the front of the existing driveshaft do the trick for far less money? I have to cut my driveshaft anyway. please explain if this is wrong. It seems like a no brainier but maybe two u joints not sliding in and out is turning you guys off. School me please. Does travel require that much slip from the yoke?
Does this only work with a IRS setup?
Last edited by likes cars; 08-09-2012 at 08:37 PM.
#6
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
I know this is an old thread but I am not sure what I am missing here.
T56 tranny's are so hard to find. The ctsv stuff shows up sometimes. I want one for my chevelle. The shifter stuff I can live with.
If the big problem with the ctsv t56 is the lack of a slip yoke then why are we all going to all the trouble to change tail shafts and all. Wouldn't a Conversion plate like this
http://www.driveshaftshop.com/2004-2...nversion-plate
Paired with a spicer flange and 1350 or 1333 added to the front of the existing driveshaft do the trick for far less money? I have to cut my driveshaft anyway. please explain if this is wrong. It seems like a no brainier but maybe two u joints not sliding in and out is turning you guys off. School me please. Does travel require that much slip from the yoke?
Does this only work with a IRS setup?
T56 tranny's are so hard to find. The ctsv stuff shows up sometimes. I want one for my chevelle. The shifter stuff I can live with.
If the big problem with the ctsv t56 is the lack of a slip yoke then why are we all going to all the trouble to change tail shafts and all. Wouldn't a Conversion plate like this
http://www.driveshaftshop.com/2004-2...nversion-plate
Paired with a spicer flange and 1350 or 1333 added to the front of the existing driveshaft do the trick for far less money? I have to cut my driveshaft anyway. please explain if this is wrong. It seems like a no brainier but maybe two u joints not sliding in and out is turning you guys off. School me please. Does travel require that much slip from the yoke?
Does this only work with a IRS setup?
Go poke around on the DSS site you linked and see what options they offer for the flanged yoke style trans, and the prices..
#7
Closed ex-Sponsor Account
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND, NY; MADE IN THE USA
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is the CTS-V trans desirable in Fbods due to the M12 gearset?
2001-2004 Z06, M12
GTO, M12 2004-2007
CTS-V M12 2004-2007
was the CTSV the first GM T56 to use a one pc. Countershaft?? was the one pc. CS used in 2004 CTSV or started in 2006 like the T56/C6Z?
Just to try and clear up the CS one piece question, was this a change in 2006 on ALL models equipped with the T56?
Regarding the CTSV pilot bearing, I learned of the different style back when GM had the Caddy LS6 motors in surplus for $3500(wish I bought a dozen); this is also the same bearing used in 2005up Corvette's
2001-2004 Z06, M12
GTO, M12 2004-2007
CTS-V M12 2004-2007
was the CTSV the first GM T56 to use a one pc. Countershaft?? was the one pc. CS used in 2004 CTSV or started in 2006 like the T56/C6Z?
Just to try and clear up the CS one piece question, was this a change in 2006 on ALL models equipped with the T56?
Regarding the CTSV pilot bearing, I learned of the different style back when GM had the Caddy LS6 motors in surplus for $3500(wish I bought a dozen); this is also the same bearing used in 2005up Corvette's
Last edited by SteveDoten@ARH; 08-09-2012 at 11:36 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
The M12 might be desirable, it depends on many factors like power, weight, gears, use, etc.
The SSR M10 and C6-Z06 T56s are the only 1pc countershaft factory setups.
No CTSv or M12 T56s had 1pc countershafts.
The CTSv got and upgraded 2nd gear synchro in 2006 if that's what youre thinking about. The 3-4 synchros also got early engagement teeth during that time.
The SSR M10 and C6-Z06 T56s are the only 1pc countershaft factory setups.
No CTSv or M12 T56s had 1pc countershafts.
The CTSv got and upgraded 2nd gear synchro in 2006 if that's what youre thinking about. The 3-4 synchros also got early engagement teeth during that time.
is the CTS-V trans desirable in Fbods due to the M12 gearset?
2001-2004 Z06, M12
GTO, M12 2004-2007
CTS-V M12 2004-2007
was the CTSV the first GM T56 to use a one pc. Countershaft?? was the one pc. CS used in 2004 CTSV or started in 2006 like the T56/C6Z?
Just to try and clear up the CS one piece question, was this a change in 2006 on ALL models equipped with the T56?
Regarding the CTSV pilot bearing, I learned of the different style back when GM had the Caddy LS6 motors in surplus for $3500(wish I bought a dozen); this is also the same bearing used in 2005up Corvette's
2001-2004 Z06, M12
GTO, M12 2004-2007
CTS-V M12 2004-2007
was the CTSV the first GM T56 to use a one pc. Countershaft?? was the one pc. CS used in 2004 CTSV or started in 2006 like the T56/C6Z?
Just to try and clear up the CS one piece question, was this a change in 2006 on ALL models equipped with the T56?
Regarding the CTSV pilot bearing, I learned of the different style back when GM had the Caddy LS6 motors in surplus for $3500(wish I bought a dozen); this is also the same bearing used in 2005up Corvette's
#9
Launching!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess it depends on your intended use. I am not building a quarter mile machine, and the IRS of the C3 Corvette I’m building doesn’t require much movement. I’m going to use a CV on the front of my shaft. The shaft is going to be so short I could probably get away with a splined stub shaft and slip yoke (truck style). If I had a solid axel I would probably go with a two piece shaft like the late Mustangs & Camaros. As to the shifter, I came up with this for the 2010 Camaro TR6060 I picked up. A TKO 600 shifter modified to give me the location of an F body T56.
http://i1159.photobucket.com/albums/...tertopview.jpg
http://i1159.photobucket.com/albums/...6282012145.jpg
http://i1159.photobucket.com/albums/...tertopview.jpg
http://i1159.photobucket.com/albums/...6282012145.jpg
#10
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
But you're still using a slip yoke or a CV joint, not a solid
Connection like the guy suggested that reopened this thread....
Connection like the guy suggested that reopened this thread....
I guess it depends on your intended use. I am not building a quarter mile machine, and the IRS of the C3 Corvette I’m building doesn’t require much movement. I’m going to use a CV on the front of my shaft. The shaft is going to be so short I could probably get away with a splined stub shaft and slip yoke (truck style). If I had a solid axel I would probably go with a two piece shaft like the late Mustangs & Camaros. As to the shifter, I came up with this for the 2010 Camaro TR6060 I picked up. A TKO 600 shifter modified to give me the location of an F body T56.
#11
Launching!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True, but he could use the adapter to mount a slip yoke drive shaft. I'm just saying that converting over to a slip yoke main shaft is not the only way.
#12
I looked into a slip yoke for the diff side. It is a common part used on trucks. So what I am proposing is like this:
Ctsv t56 to conversion plate to spicer flange to 1350 to driveshaft to slip yoke end before another 1350 at the rear end. It will mechanically operate the same in theory, the slip just occurs inside the rear of the driveshaft rather than the tail of the tranny.
Why not? The cost of converting a caddy 6 speed is huge. The driveshaft work has to occur one way or another.
Ctsv t56 to conversion plate to spicer flange to 1350 to driveshaft to slip yoke end before another 1350 at the rear end. It will mechanically operate the same in theory, the slip just occurs inside the rear of the driveshaft rather than the tail of the tranny.
Why not? The cost of converting a caddy 6 speed is huge. The driveshaft work has to occur one way or another.
Last edited by likes cars; 08-13-2012 at 04:20 PM.
#14
Launching!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I looked into a slip yoke for the diff side. It is a common part used on trucks. So what I am proposing is like this:
Ctsv t56 to conversion plate to spicer flange to 1350 to driveshaft to slip yoke end before another 1350 at the rear end. It will mechanically operate the same in theory, the slip just occurs inside the rear of the driveshaft rather than the tail of the tranny.
Why not? The cost of converting a caddy 6 speed is huge. The driveshaft work has to occur one way or another.
Ctsv t56 to conversion plate to spicer flange to 1350 to driveshaft to slip yoke end before another 1350 at the rear end. It will mechanically operate the same in theory, the slip just occurs inside the rear of the driveshaft rather than the tail of the tranny.
Why not? The cost of converting a caddy 6 speed is huge. The driveshaft work has to occur one way or another.
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
I looked into a slip yoke for the diff side. It is a common part used on trucks. So what I am proposing is like this:
Ctsv t56 to conversion plate to spicer flange to 1350 to driveshaft to slip yoke end before another 1350 at the rear end. It will mechanically operate the same in theory, the slip just occurs inside the rear of the driveshaft rather than the tail of the tranny.
Why not? The cost of converting a caddy 6 speed is huge. The driveshaft work has to occur one way or another.
Ctsv t56 to conversion plate to spicer flange to 1350 to driveshaft to slip yoke end before another 1350 at the rear end. It will mechanically operate the same in theory, the slip just occurs inside the rear of the driveshaft rather than the tail of the tranny.
Why not? The cost of converting a caddy 6 speed is huge. The driveshaft work has to occur one way or another.
Are you talking about a slip spline like used on the rear of the front driveshaft in a 2pc. driveline GM truck?
Your last point is good one although I place value on sticking with a stock length driveline where possible.
I went to a longstanding reputable shop here a few weeks ago. His "lowrider" setup sounded like that.
#16
Launching!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Way to keep on pursuing more options. Are these conversion plates out there or are you just talking a simple billet plate job?
Are you talking about a slip spline like used on the rear of the front driveshaft in a 2pc. driveline GM truck?
Your last point is good one although I place value on sticking with a stock length driveline where possible.
I went to a longstanding reputable shop here a few weeks ago. His "lowrider" setup sounded like that.
Are you talking about a slip spline like used on the rear of the front driveshaft in a 2pc. driveline GM truck?
Your last point is good one although I place value on sticking with a stock length driveline where possible.
I went to a longstanding reputable shop here a few weeks ago. His "lowrider" setup sounded like that.
Yes the splined stub shaft with a slip yoke drive shaft (four wheel drive style)
As more of these transmisions enter the supply chain people will find a way.
2006, conversion, converting, cts, ctsv, drive, driveshaft, problems, reverse, shaft, shift, slip, style, t56, transmission, vt56, yoke