TKO 600 or T56, LS1 67 Camaro
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TKO 600 or T56, LS1 67 Camaro
Hello all,
I am sure this has been debated, and I could only find one thread directly related to my question, but not per my application. So here goes...
I am building a 67 Camaro as if it would have come from GM recently (hence the LS1). Car will have a 2 inch drop, engine is stock (for now), not sure about a gear yet (9 inch). I am in between the TKO 600 and the T56. I will drive it a lot, and romp on it occasionally, but not constantly.
When I called a vendor regarding this dilemna, his response was "unless I need it for my ego, the TKO 600 is enough". What I got from that was that both will do the job well, but the ability to say I was running a "6 speed", was the basic difference in the two, as far as my application goes.
I am not completely worried about the money difference, but the TKO will save me about 1,500, once the install is complete, but I will not have the hydraulic throwout bearing. The TKO kit comes with a stock type throwout bearing setup. The plus with the TKO is that I can move that money saved to other parts of the car.
I also read where the T56 is considered stronger, but I will not be driving this to the extreme. I would be interested in hearing some opinions regarding my options.
Thanks in advance,
Jim
I am sure this has been debated, and I could only find one thread directly related to my question, but not per my application. So here goes...
I am building a 67 Camaro as if it would have come from GM recently (hence the LS1). Car will have a 2 inch drop, engine is stock (for now), not sure about a gear yet (9 inch). I am in between the TKO 600 and the T56. I will drive it a lot, and romp on it occasionally, but not constantly.
When I called a vendor regarding this dilemna, his response was "unless I need it for my ego, the TKO 600 is enough". What I got from that was that both will do the job well, but the ability to say I was running a "6 speed", was the basic difference in the two, as far as my application goes.
I am not completely worried about the money difference, but the TKO will save me about 1,500, once the install is complete, but I will not have the hydraulic throwout bearing. The TKO kit comes with a stock type throwout bearing setup. The plus with the TKO is that I can move that money saved to other parts of the car.
I also read where the T56 is considered stronger, but I will not be driving this to the extreme. I would be interested in hearing some opinions regarding my options.
Thanks in advance,
Jim
#2
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Westport, Indiana
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are the good and bad about each. I am using a T56 in my 68 for reference.
If not drag racing the TKO will shift fine unless you want to do high RPM shifts frequently. It will handle all that the LS1 can throw at it strength wise. The manual clutch linkage is great except you won't be able to use long tube headers. All the long tubes I know of wont clear the clutch linkage. So if long tubes are not important you will have to run hydraulic on both tranny's.
I personally used the T56 to run a lower gear and still have the .50 over-drive instead of the .64 in the TKO. I definately wanted long tube headers so the hydraulic TO bearing applies to me either way. I have had T56's in a couple different cars and like the way they shift better at higher rpms's especially if they have upgraded internals.
Ease of instillation definately goes to the TKO. T56 is tight and the shifter location is farther back than stock.
If not drag racing the TKO will shift fine unless you want to do high RPM shifts frequently. It will handle all that the LS1 can throw at it strength wise. The manual clutch linkage is great except you won't be able to use long tube headers. All the long tubes I know of wont clear the clutch linkage. So if long tubes are not important you will have to run hydraulic on both tranny's.
I personally used the T56 to run a lower gear and still have the .50 over-drive instead of the .64 in the TKO. I definately wanted long tube headers so the hydraulic TO bearing applies to me either way. I have had T56's in a couple different cars and like the way they shift better at higher rpms's especially if they have upgraded internals.
Ease of instillation definately goes to the TKO. T56 is tight and the shifter location is farther back than stock.
#3
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the info. Its nice to have some been there-done that info. I am leaning towards the T56. I figure if I am going to have to buy the Hyd clutch package for the TKO600 I may as well upgrade to the T56.
Thanks,
Jim
Thanks,
Jim
#4
Banned
iTrader: (60)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adkins - Tx
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T56>TKO600
TKO600 - fits better in the car and will bolt up to a generic style GM passenger car bellhousing.
T56 - stronger, double overdrive and shifts better
It really comes down to those things....... I've done conversion with both units over the years.
TKO600 - fits better in the car and will bolt up to a generic style GM passenger car bellhousing.
T56 - stronger, double overdrive and shifts better
It really comes down to those things....... I've done conversion with both units over the years.
#5
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now which T56 is better for me???
Thanks for the info guys.
#6
Banned
iTrader: (60)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adkins - Tx
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeh, I hear you. I think I have my direction now. TKO600 would be nice for a driver, but knowing me it's gonna be a bigger cam next, then some heads, then who knows what?? I am going to look to the future and just go with a T56. Should not be too difficult since the car is stripped for the build.
Now which T56 is better for me???
Thanks for the info guys.
Now which T56 is better for me???
Thanks for the info guys.
#7
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now it is down to the .66 or the .50 setup. My research leads me to believe that rule of thumb is that if running a 4:11 or lower the .50 is the setup, looks like 3:73 or higher the .66 setup is preferred. Anywhere I can get some more info on this?
One more question for some of you in the know. With the T56 scattershield, do I have the option of installing either manual or hydraulic linkage, or is there a specific bell for each setup? I am considering manual linkage for cost savings and dependability. I plan to use the stock vette manifolds that are on the engine (with slight modification).
Opinions?
Thx
One more question for some of you in the know. With the T56 scattershield, do I have the option of installing either manual or hydraulic linkage, or is there a specific bell for each setup? I am considering manual linkage for cost savings and dependability. I plan to use the stock vette manifolds that are on the engine (with slight modification).
Opinions?
Thx
Last edited by gearhead36; 11-05-2011 at 07:02 AM.
Trending Topics
#10
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
the TKO 600 I have seems to work well, it shifts just fine a 7200 with my LY6, and I use a mechanical clutch linkage with long tubes. I did have to modify #5 header tube.
If you are going drag racing all the time then you wont like any trans that has syncros, you'll need a faceplated trans.
PS my TKO is for sale, as I am going to a faceplated trans
If you are going drag racing all the time then you wont like any trans that has syncros, you'll need a faceplated trans.
PS my TKO is for sale, as I am going to a faceplated trans
#11
Banned
iTrader: (60)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adkins - Tx
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It does have smaller engagement teeth on the gears and sliders so its less forgiving when your clutch isn't working properly, you are using it properly or you miss a gear. If everything is working good and you make clean shifts, you should be ok. If I were Tremec I would have just started from scratch on the Magnum instead of trying to repackage it in a T56 main case. They could have stretched the case 2" to allow for better syncro assemblies and just shortend the tail housing by that 2" to keep the entire trans the same length.