Manual Transmission T56 | T5 | MN12 | Clutches | Hydraulics | Shifters

t56 2.66 or 2.97 gear set??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2014, 10:54 AM
  #21  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (15)
 
SNLPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ws6guy27
So keep the 2.66 gearing? Use spray out of the hole and use 28" tire and if fast enough.. suspension.. motor.. traction.. ect.. I can possibly hit 160 in 1/4?
It has better shift extension and he's done it. You said you're only willing to spin 7000 though, but with a 3.54 and 28" tire you can go 165...with a 2.97 first and 3.54 rear you will have better SLR(starting line ratio) or overall gearing than 3.90 and 2.66
Old 02-28-2014, 11:00 AM
  #22  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
blue99fbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ws6guy27
So keep the 2.66 gearing? Use spray out of the hole and use 28" tire and if fast enough.. suspension.. motor.. traction.. ect.. I can possibly hit 160 in 1/4?
every aspect of the car has to have the right parts and set up correctly. and you have to be able to drive it. what does the car weigh? what suspension? will need some gear in it. 160 is a tall task. how fast have you been previously, et/mph? your gonna wanna leave on the nitrous for the tq so you can leave at a lower rpm and not smack the tires so hard. i would leave around 4500-5000 on nitrous and 60' 1.29-1.35 but on motor it wouldnt 60 for **** bc id have to leave around 6000-6500 to get it to not bog and then it would smack the tire with to much wheel speed. but i never really made more than a handful of n/a passes.
Old 02-28-2014, 07:04 PM
  #23  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
ws6guy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: my house
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what everyone is basically saying is with my 3.54 gears.. the 2.of trans gearset is best with the 28" tire and spray out of the hole.. unless I change rear gears to 3.73 or so and leave the 2.66 gear ratio.. With 28 tire and spray out of the hole.. Both will net me close to my 160 1/4 mile goal
Old 02-28-2014, 07:29 PM
  #24  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
ws6guy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: my house
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blue99fbody
every aspect of the car has to have the right parts and set up correctly. and you have to be able to drive it. what does the car weigh? what suspension? will need some gear in it. 160 is a tall task. how fast have you been previously, et/mph? your gonna wanna leave on the nitrous for the tq so you can leave at a lower rpm and not smack the tires so hard. i would leave around 4500-5000 on nitrous and 60' 1.29-1.35 but on motor it wouldnt 60 for **** bc id have to leave around 6000-6500 to get it to not bog and then it would smack the tire with to much wheel speed. but i never really made more than a handful of n/a passes.


Can u pm me what ur setup is.. shocks.. rear gear.. clutch.. line lock. Just everythjng. Bc in ur videos u hook really well.. ur setup is badass.. give me some pointers and or other parts that would help me.. iL have the built trans.. twin clutch( don't know which one yet) have qa1 in the rear and strange adjustable in the front. Gping have 200 through a plate.. I have a line lock.. iL have the Lnc 2000 hooked up.. I have bottle heater.. purge.. pressure guage.. iL have to switch from the 26" tires to 28..

Which my 26 are new.. If anyone's interested.. There mickeys.. still have stickers on them..

Last edited by ws6guy27; 02-28-2014 at 09:13 PM.
Old 03-01-2014, 11:08 AM
  #25  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (15)
 
SNLPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The steeper gearing whether trans or rearend will help match engine rpm to wheel speed faster and allow you to launch lower from more torque multiplication meaning you shock the tires less as Ray mentioned. The 28" with more sidewall and better rollout will help lessen shock and help hook better at the power you're talking about making on spray, if you have any questions about a clutch don't hesitate. Chris, 817-750-2000
Old 03-01-2014, 08:01 PM
  #26  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
ws6guy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: my house
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SNLPerformance
The steeper gearing whether trans or rearend will help match engine rpm to wheel speed faster and allow you to launch lower from more torque multiplication meaning you shock the tires less as Ray mentioned. The 28" with more sidewall and better rollout will help lessen shock and help hook better at the power you're talking about making on spray, if you have any questions about a clutch don't hesitate. Chris, 817-750-2000

So what gearing would u suggest with the 28" tire? If I stayed with 3.54??

Would it be better to stay at 3.54 and use a 2.97 trans gear? Or change gears to let's say 3.73 and use the stronger 2.66 gear?

And on a clutch.. iv talked to Steve about the lt1-so version.. just want ur thots as well bc I do need a twin clutch.. I just don't know the difference in monster.. mcleod.. spec..

I just want somthing that will hold.. not chatter.. shift good at any rpm.. Won't blow my engine up is my biggest worry.. and idk if yal use carbon/carbon setups.. Idk much about the different brands
Old 03-03-2014, 11:18 AM
  #27  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (15)
 
SNLPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

What is your previous drag racing experience? You have a tall order to fill, but I would recommend the LT1-SC.
Old 03-03-2014, 12:24 PM
  #28  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
ws6guy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: my house
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SNLPerformance
What is your previous drag racing experience? You have a tall order to fill, but I would recommend the LT1-SC.

Just a a goal I want get close to possibly hit.. can u tell me pros and cons of this clutch compared to the mcleod rxt or spec twin?
Old 03-04-2014, 10:54 AM
  #29  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (15)
 
SNLPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It will have longer life than both as it's the only twin disc on the market that can compensate for wear and has a built in pedal stop as well as T-rivets on floater to assist in high rpm release. Pedal effort will offer more feedback than the super light v6 pressure plate used in the RXT, but not be as hard to modulate as the Spec twin. All 3 use similar ceramic frictions and strapped floater plates, hope that helps.

Last edited by SNLPerformance; 03-06-2014 at 10:14 AM.
Old 03-05-2014, 12:55 AM
  #30  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
ws6guy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: my house
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SNLPerformance
It will have longer life than both as it's the only twin disc on the market that can and has a built in pedal stop as well as T-rivets on floater to assist in high rpm release. Pedal effort will offer more feedback than the super light v6 pressure plate used in the RXT, but not be as hard to modulate as the Spec twin. All 3 use similar ceramic frictions and strapped floater plates, hope that helps.


Sounds interesting.. very very good information.. so.. if I kept the stronger 2.66 headset.. would 3.73in the rear be enough? Really don't want 4.10s...been there done that with a auto.. useless... but they don't make anything between a 3.73 and 4.10 for a strange Dana s60. Unless I have been misinformed
Old 03-06-2014, 10:22 AM
  #31  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (15)
 
SNLPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ws6guy27
Sounds interesting.. very very good information.. so.. if I kept the stronger 2.66 headset.. would 3.73in the rear be enough? Really don't want 4.10s...been there done that with a auto.. useless... but they don't make anything between a 3.73 and 4.10 for a strange Dana s60. Unless I have been misinformed
Again not sure of your definition of enough, the more gear the easier to launch plain and simple with a manual atleast...the 3.73 will allow for ~156mph in 4th @7000
Old 03-06-2014, 12:29 PM
  #32  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
ws6guy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: my house
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So staying 3.55 and the 2.66 trans gear would be a dog on launch?
Old 03-06-2014, 04:31 PM
  #33  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (15)
 
SNLPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ws6guy27
So staying 3.55 and the 2.66 trans gear would be a dog on launch?
I wouldn't say a dog, but it will be harder to get the same 60' without putting more strain on the parts with less mechanical leverage...looking forward to your track results either way you decide to go.
Old 03-07-2014, 03:32 PM
  #34  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
ws6guy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: my house
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SNLPerformance
I wouldn't say a dog, but it will be harder to get the same 60' without putting more strain on the parts with less mechanical leverage...looking forward to your track results either way you decide to go.

Well looks like I need to get the 2 97 gearset but it being not as strong as the 2.66 gear set worries me
Old 03-11-2014, 03:05 PM
  #35  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
ws6guy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: my house
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What gearset are people running? Has anyone have any problems with the 2.97?
Old 08-15-2014, 12:47 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Spectre86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,162
Received 37 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

what did you end up going with?
Old 08-16-2014, 01:19 PM
  #37  
Teching In
 
bmans vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Conventional wisdom is that a 10-1 total ratio is best.
My 4.11 in my 67 Camaro did much better with the Super T-10 with a 2.64 first than the 2.20 stock muncie in it. I could lift the left front tire on launch and had faster trap times.

I too would like to know what OP went with finally.

Bman
Old 06-17-2019, 09:55 AM
  #38  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

I will be that guy and revive an old thread as im about to swap back to a 6spd after going automatic for 3years.
I've driven my car with stock 6spd for a long time and always wished I had a lower 1st ratio as I tore clutches up to often. I'm now looking at a magnum trans and have a lot more motor than I did then.
With a 6spd ,I should be close to 600 rwhp all motor.

4.10 rear gear and which ever tire works best at the track. I have a 275x60 pro now and probably stick with that since its softer and more side wall than a 26" but still stable on big end.

If I go 2.66 first gear I'd probably need to stay 26" tires. I really dont want to leave up at 6500 like I use to but if clutch can take it I'd probably end up doing that anyway ��.

Dart 427 solid roller shifting at 7800 ,4.10 gears in rear end, which first would be best?

Last edited by AINT SKEERED; 06-18-2019 at 06:00 PM.
Old 06-18-2019, 03:12 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
SSSTANG#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 592
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I had the 2.97 (TUET-11011) wide ratio Magnum with a 4.10 in the rear on a 26x10 stiff wall slicks with tubes and went 9.41. NA LS engine in a foxbody, 3050 lbs race weight. Best 60’ with that trans/clutch and tires was 1.24-1.26.
Old 06-18-2019, 03:29 PM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSSTANG#1
I had the 2.97 (TUET-11011) wide ratio Magnum with a 4.10 in the rear on a 26x10 stiff wall slicks with tubes and went 9.41. NA LS engine in a foxbody, 3050 lbs race weight. Best 60’ with that trans/clutch and tires was 1.24-1.26.
Seems like it's gonna take less rpm on the launch to get moving. That's a great 60 ft


Quick Reply: t56 2.66 or 2.97 gear set??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.