Midwestern Members IA, IL, IN , KY, MI, MN, MO, NE, OH, WI, KS, OK

Email Florida's Governor Now!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2005, 10:24 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
30th TA 0219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Middleburg, FL
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Email Florida's Governor Now!!

Yesterday the Florida Senate unanimously approved legislation that would increase the fines for "drag racing" and give police the power to seize automobiles used in races. As the House passed the measure on Monday by a vote of 111-1, the measure will now go to Governor Jeb Bush for his signature.

State Representative John Quinones (R-Kissimmee) introduced the bill following drag racing accidents that claimed four lives last year. The legislation provides maximum penalties including a $1000 fine, two-year license suspension and imprisonment for violators. The police can also immediately seize a car used in a race for 10 days without due process for the first offense. On the second offense, police can seize and sell the car used, regardless of its value.

The legislation only defines drag racing as comparing the speed or power of one vehicle to another vehicle on a public road or in a parking lot, "at accelerating speeds in a competitive attempt to outdistance each other." The penalties apply regardless of whether anyone was actually harmed or threatened with harm from such a contest.

Article Excerpt:
HB 71, Engrossed 2005
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

A bill to be entitled
An act relating to motor vehicle speed competitions; amending s. 316.191, F.S.; defining the term "conviction"; specifying that the section applies to motor vehicles; revising penalties for violation of prohibitions against described motor vehicle speed competitions; providing for impoundment of vehicles used in violation of motor vehicle speed competition provisions; providing for application of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act; providing an effective date.

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:

Section 1. Section 316.191, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
316.191 Racing on highways.—
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) "Conviction" means a determination of guilt that is the result of a plea or trial, regardless of whether adjudication is withheld.
(b) "Drag race" means the operation of two or more motor vehicles from a point side by side at accelerating speeds in a competitive attempt to outdistance each other, or the operation of one or more motor vehicles over a common selected course, from the same point to the same point, for the purpose of comparing the relative speeds or power of acceleration of such motor vehicle or motor vehicles within a certain distance or time limit.
(c) "Racing" means the use of one or more motor vehicles in an attempt to outgain or, outdistance another motor vehicle, to or prevent another motor vehicle from passing, to arrive at a given destination ahead of another motor vehicle or motor vehicles, or to test the physical stamina or endurance of drivers over long-distance driving routes.
(2)(a) A person may not:
1. Drive any motor vehicle, including any motorcycle, in any race; speed competition or contest; drag race or acceleration contest; test of physical endurance, or; exhibition of speed or acceleration; or for the purpose of making a speed record on any highway, roadway, or parking lot;
2. In any manner participate in, coordinate, facilitate, or collect moneys at any location for any such race, competition, contest, test, or exhibition;
3. Knowingly ride as a passenger in any such race, competition, contest, test, or exhibition; or
4. Purposefully cause the movement of traffic to slow or stop for, any such race, competition, contest, test, or exhibition.

Any person who violates any provision of this paragraph commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. Any person who violates any provision of this paragraph shall pay a fine of not less than $500 and not more than $1,000, and the department shall revoke the driver license of a person so convicted for 1 year. A hearing may be requested pursuant to s. 322.271.

(b) Any person who violates paragraph (a) within 5 years after the date of a prior violation that resulted in a conviction for a violation of this subsection commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, and shall pay a fine of not less than $500 and not more than $1,000. The department shall also revoke the driver license of that person for 2 years. A hearing may be requested pursuant to s. 322.271.
(c) In any case charging a violation of paragraph (a), the court shall be provided a copy of the driving record of the person charged and may obtain any records from any other source to determine if one or more prior convictions of the person for violation of paragraph (a) have occurred within 5 years prior to the charged offense.
(3) Whenever a law enforcement officer determines that a person was engaged in a drag race or race, as described in subsection (1), the officer may immediately arrest and take such person into custody. The court may enter an order of impoundment or immobilization as a condition of incarceration or probation. Within 7 business days after the date the court issues the order of impoundment or immobilization, the clerk of the court must send notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the registered owner of the motor vehicle, if the registered owner is a person other than the defendant, and to each person of record claiming a lien against the motor vehicle.
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the impounding agency shall release a motor vehicle under the conditions provided in s. 316.193(6)(e), (f), (g), and (h), if the owner or agent presents a valid driver license at the time of pickup of the motor vehicle.
(b) All costs and fees for the impoundment or immobilization, including the cost of notification, must be paid by the owner of the motor vehicle or, if the motor vehicle is leased or rented, by the person leasing or renting the motor vehicle, unless the impoundment or immobilization order is dismissed. All provisions of s. 713.78 shall apply.
(c) Any motor vehicle used in violation of subsection (2) may be impounded for a period of 10 business days if a law enforcement officer has arrested and taken a person into custody pursuant to this subsection and the person being arrested is the registered owner or coowner of the motor vehicle. If the arresting officer finds that the criteria of this paragraph are met, the officer may immediately impound the motor vehicle. The law enforcement officer shall notify the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles of any impoundment for violation of this subsection in accordance with procedures established by the department. The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) shall be applicable to such impoundment.
(4) Any motor vehicle used in violation of subsection (2) by any person within 5 years after the date of a prior conviction of that person for a violation under subsection (2) may be seized and forfeited as provided by the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. This subsection shall only be applicable if the owner of the motor vehicle is the person charged with violation of subsection (2).
(5) This section does not apply to licensed or duly authorized racetracks, drag strips, or other designated areas set aside by proper authorities for such purposes.

Section 2. This act shall take effect October 1, 2005.

jeb.bush@myflorida.com

KEEP IT CIVIL AND PROFESSIONAL PLEASE!!!
Old 05-09-2005, 02:14 PM
  #2  
NKAWTG...N
iTrader: (3)
 
StoleIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 4,760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thats bulll shiet. while i think its horrible that four people were killed due to "drag racing" last year that pails in comparison to the number of people killed due to stupidty in normal every day driving. Drag racing isn't the source of automible accidents, and it sounds like this is just a way to get votes. Glad to see atleast one representative had the ***** to vote no...111 to 1...
Old 05-09-2005, 02:31 PM
  #3  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,019
Likes: 0
Received 1,467 Likes on 1,058 Posts

Default

That is a stupid law. Gives police too much power at the scene even if they just think the incident was racing. Immediate vehicle seizeure is going way too far.
Old 05-09-2005, 02:35 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by stoleit
Drag racing isn't the source of automible accidents
It certainly can be.
Old 05-09-2005, 03:00 PM
  #5  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,019
Likes: 0
Received 1,467 Likes on 1,058 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
It certainly can be.
There are TONS of things that people do every day on the road that could and do lead to accidents, that do not carry a vehicle seizure penatly.

As usual, they pick on the 'car' croud.

How many soccer moms talking on the phone and/or putting makeup on and/or wrestling with the kids and still trying to drive their 50,000lb SUV are getting their vehicles seized? I'm a hell of a lot more afriad of that situation, which I encounter on an almost daily basis.
Old 05-09-2005, 03:02 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Velocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

HAHAHA... you guys are hilarious.

I'll say the same thing in here that I said everywhere else this thread has been posted on this site.

You should all mail Jebb and say, "Don't sign this. You should legalize street racing."

What a friggin joke.

Take it to the track, or don't complain if you get caught.
Old 05-09-2005, 03:04 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
There are TONS of things that people do every day on the road that could and do lead to accidents, that do not carry a vehicle seizure penatly.

As usual, they pick on the 'car' croud.

How many soccer moms talking on the phone and/or putting makeup on and/or wrestling with the kids and still trying to drive their 50,000lb SUV are getting their vehicles seized? I'm a hell of a lot more afriad of that situation, which I encounter on an almost daily basis.
I just love that argument. Seriously, I love it when people say that because that argument is SOOO full of holes it's not even funny. You are saying that attempting to limit/stop one dangerous thing on the road is stupid and pointless and should'nt be done simply because there are other dangerous things. Have you noticed that a lot of places are banning cell phones while driving or limiting it to hands free use? Do you think the "soccer moms" and business people are bitching b/c they are being picked on?
Old 05-09-2005, 03:14 PM
  #8  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,019
Likes: 0
Received 1,467 Likes on 1,058 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Velocity

Take it to the track, or don't complain if you get caught.
It's too bad that some people just don't get it......

The more power you give police at the scene, the more potential for drastic errors that lead to getting a car seized.

I'm not even talking about actual racing here, just some event that a cop might think is racing. Two loud, performance cars driving side-by-side (not racing); friends cruising to a common destination and such..... think cops haven't made the error of thinking this was a drag race when catching a look from the wrong angle? Think again. It's happened, more than once that I know of.

I'm not saying racing on the street should be 'legal', all I'm saying is, the police shouldn't have that kind of power for a traffic volation. If they make a mistake, you lose your car without even doing anything wrong. It's bad enough getting a ticket by mistake, but this would be

But yeah I know, more new laws make some people feel better (liberals). Let's just lock up everyone so we're all safe from ourselves.
Old 05-09-2005, 03:19 PM
  #9  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,019
Likes: 0
Received 1,467 Likes on 1,058 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
I just love that argument. Seriously, I love it when people say that because that argument is SOOO full of holes it's not even funny. You are saying that attempting to limit/stop one dangerous thing on the road is stupid and pointless and should'nt be done simply because there are other dangerous things. Have you noticed that a lot of places are banning cell phones while driving or limiting it to hands free use? Do you think the "soccer moms" and business people are bitching b/c they are being picked on?
Are their cars being seized?

I love your arguement too. It's got just as many holes.

At least we still have the right to disagree in this country.
Old 05-09-2005, 03:22 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
Are their cars being seized?

I love your arguement too. It's got just as many holes.

At least we still have the right to disagree in this country.
The car isn't seized on this bill until the second conviction in five years time. Yes, we do have the right to disagree, and we use it!
Old 05-09-2005, 03:25 PM
  #11  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,019
Likes: 0
Received 1,467 Likes on 1,058 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
The car isn't seized on this bill until the second conviction in five years time.
Really? I read different.


Originally Posted by 30th TA 0219
The police can also immediately seize a car used in a race for 10 days without due process for the first offense.
Who wants to lose their car for 10 days due to a potential error, without even getting to see a judge first?
Old 05-09-2005, 03:27 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

So your hangup is that you forsee people losing their car for ten days without seeing a judge based on an officers error when they weren't racing?
Old 05-09-2005, 03:29 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Edited whole dang post:


Whenever a law enforcement officer determines that a person was engaged in a drag race or race, as described in subsection (1), the officer may immediately arrest and take such person into custody. The court may enter an order of impoundment or immobilization as a condition of incarceration or probation. Within 7 business days after the date the court issues the order of impoundment or immobilization, the clerk of the court must send notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the registered owner of the motor vehicle, if the registered owner is a person other than the defendant, and to each person of record claiming a lien against the motor vehicle
Old 05-09-2005, 03:35 PM
  #14  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,019
Likes: 0
Received 1,467 Likes on 1,058 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
So your hangup is that you forsee people losing their car for ten days without seeing a judge based on an officers error when they weren't racing?
Exactly.

Cops are people. They make mistakes, and sometimes innocent people become the victims of these mistakes. If it's just a wrongful ticket, at least you have the chance to go to court with a lawyer and fight it before anything becomes of it.

So all I'm saying is, I don't think this is a serious enough crime to warrent immediate seizure of a car when TONS of other equally potentially dangerous traffic violations don't carry that sort of penataly.

If it really was a mistake, and you have a clean record, were you given the chance to get a lawyer and go before a judge you could probably avoid losing your car.
Old 05-09-2005, 03:38 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

This is the key sentence from the section I quoted:
The court may enter an order of impoundment or immobilization as a condition of incarceration or probation
Old 05-09-2005, 03:45 PM
  #16  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,019
Likes: 0
Received 1,467 Likes on 1,058 Posts

Default

This is the section that concerns me......

(c) Any motor vehicle used in violation of subsection (2) may be impounded for a period of 10 business days if a law enforcement officer has arrested and taken a person into custody pursuant to this subsection and the person being arrested is the registered owner or coowner of the motor vehicle. If the arresting officer finds that the criteria of this paragraph are met, the officer may immediately impound the motor vehicle.
Old 05-09-2005, 03:53 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I can understand that.
Also, I don't know for sure, but it seems like they wouldn't be the first place by a long shot to do this. I'm pretty sure I've heard of other places having a similer law....
Old 05-09-2005, 11:41 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
30th TA 0219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Middleburg, FL
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the point is the precedent it sets EVERYHWERE!!!
TOO much control by ONE cop
DUIs don't get **** compared to this!
Old 05-09-2005, 11:44 PM
  #19  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You know, I think they often times need to be MUCH more strict with DUI type incidents.
Old 05-10-2005, 12:07 AM
  #20  
NKAWTG...N
iTrader: (3)
 
StoleIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 4,760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey man RPM your doing a great job of saying exactly what I was going to say. While I don't think street racing is smart, it can be done in a controlled manner. I have no problem with the people who go on a road with no intersection and just unwind a couple of gears. I do have a problem with people who race during rush hour or down school zones.

Basically I have no problem punishing street racers who get caught, if I get caught I'll wont cry when my punishment comes, but impounding and selling someone else's property is BS. For my first and only speeding ticket, the person who went to the judge before me was on his 5th, FIFTH, DUI/DWI stop. He got away with some fines but still had the ability to drive away from the court house. Now maybe its just me, but I think someone on their 5th DUI is a tid bit more dangerous than someone who got caught racing their car.


Quick Reply: Email Florida's Governor Now!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.