436rwhp with cam/bolt ons
08-04-2012, 11:30 AM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Louis
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
436rwhp with cam/bolt ons Car has stock untouched 241 heads, ls6 intake, and pnp stock Tb. Full exhaust with cats, cam and lid. That's it. Longtubes, custom y pipe, Slp lm2. I'll post dyno sheet later. 02 ws6 m6 with 3.42s on 10 bolt, no track times yet still need better tires and weather before that.
http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_u...?v=KYhSbMpqqa4
http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_u...?v=KYhSbMpqqa4
08-04-2012, 01:02 PM
#3
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Louis
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a hydraulic roller, 2100-6800 rpm with 110+2 LSA.. I'll have to find exact specs on duration later tonight. Runs great but it's just good for racing, the huge lift makes it a pain to stop and go a lot. Car was tuned by Redline performance
08-04-2012, 02:29 PM
#7
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hilliard fl.
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you got the dyno sheet on that? Not trying to call you bluff but that is a lot of horsepower for a cam only car.Cam and head car barely does that. What kind of dyno was you on? That is impressive. Okay I did not read race only my bad.
Last edited by sabersaw30; 08-04-2012 at 02:37 PM.
Trending Topics
08-04-2012, 02:47 PM
#8
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Louis
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With a set of heads it was only going to gain maybe 30rwhp so cost vs hp ratio didn't weigh out when it's running like it does on stock heads. The rims are 19x275x10.5 and no they don't hook for ****. They look damn good tho when clean, car is lowered about an inch as well. Not much tire on the wheel, but it will soon receive a set of skinny/fat slicks for a couple passes at Gateway when it cools off. Hopefully the rear end holds up, car only just turned 80k miles, I think it's got a couple hard passes in it on the stock gears. 4.10s would probably kill it, not to mention be really annoying with the cam
08-04-2012, 02:53 PM
#9
I was pretty amazed at the numbers, it's probably due to the giant cam, but still the shop it was tuned at said it was the highest cam bolt on car they have ever seen. With a set of heads it was only going to gain maybe 30rwhp so cost vs hp ratio didn't weigh out when it's running like it does on stock heads. The rims are 19x275x10.5 and no they don't hook for ****. They look damn good tho when clean, car is lowered about an inch as well. Not much tire on the wheel, but it will soon receive a set of skinny/fat slicks for a couple passes at Gateway when it cools off. Hopefully the rear end holds up, car only just turned 80k miles, I think it's got a couple hard passes in it on the stock gears. 4.10s would probably kill it, not to mention be really annoying with the cam
With a set of heads it was only going to gain maybe 30rwhp so cost vs hp ratio didn't weigh out when it's running like it does on stock heads. The rims are 19x275x10.5 and no they don't hook for ****. They look damn good tho when clean, car is lowered about an inch as well. Not much tire on the wheel, but it will soon receive a set of skinny/fat slicks for a couple passes at Gateway when it cools off. Hopefully the rear end holds up, car only just turned 80k miles, I think it's got a couple hard passes in it on the stock gears. 4.10s would probably kill it, not to mention be really annoying with the cam
08-04-2012, 03:02 PM
#10
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Louis
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes it's a 6 speed, with a z06 clutch and stock 3.42s. Donkey kick cam is a great way to describe it, very different from my stockish z28. So the shorter gear ratio will make it not buck so bad under 20mph? The main reason for the stock gears was to save the rear.
08-04-2012, 04:54 PM
#14
Specs on cam? 4.10s are not THAT short on a 6 speed and not firmiliar with that but from waht i know bucking ensues at a certain RPM not speed. Yeah i can see your reasoning for saving the rear. If its not THAT big of a cam and you are having bucking issues you should look into another tuner.
08-04-2012, 06:06 PM
#15
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Louis
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea i got some pics, sorry guys still not home.. it has a wsq hood that hasn't been painted yet and a lot of stuff under the hood to make it look better. I'll post a good pic of the rims too
08-04-2012, 06:08 PM
#16
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Louis
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Specs on cam? 4.10s are not THAT short on a 6 speed and not firmiliar with that but from waht i know bucking ensues at a certain RPM not speed. Yeah i can see your reasoning for saving the rear. If its not THAT big of a cam and you are having bucking issues you should look into another tuner.
08-04-2012, 09:44 PM
#19
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
What rpm are you turning it. 4.10 may be to much gear. With that kind of power you should be at 120mph+/- in the qtr. With a stock height tire @ 6800 I could only go 122 beating on the limiter to get threw the trapps. 3.90 or 3.73 also holds up better than 4.10. Nice ride!
