Is this dyno possible?
03-06-2004, 09:04 PM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego/Schertz,Texas
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Is this dyno possible? Only mods i have are whats in my sig. TSP Lid and GMMG catback. I pulled a 352rwhp@5200/373rwtq@4200. twice. sounds high to me. there was an 03Cobra right before me witha pulley and he pulled 400.7rwhp. When i saw my #s, i couldnt believe it. Just wondering if its possible.
Trending Topics
03-06-2004, 09:34 PM
#8
Copy & Paste Moderator
You can resize it and/or resave it in a a lower quality using an image editing program. Any image editing program will do. Digital cameras ususally come with them and so does Microsoft Office. LS1Tech has a size limit on files you can attach, but I dont know what it is.
--VIP1
--VIP1
03-06-2004, 09:42 PM
#11
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KrazyDan
Only mods i have are whats in my sig. TSP Lid and GMMG catback. I pulled a 352rwhp@5200/373rwtq@4200. twice. sounds high to me. there was an 03Cobra right before me witha pulley and he pulled 400.7rwhp. When i saw my #s, i couldnt believe it. Just wondering if its possible.
WOW!!!
I say you got a freak on your hands! Congratulations
03-06-2004, 09:44 PM
#12
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego/Schertz,Texas
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by jrp
did they dyno in the right gear and why does your HP fall off so quick, it should at least cross the tq line.
03-06-2004, 09:51 PM
#13
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was it corrected for atmospheric conditions, or are those raw numbers? I don't see where it denotes that it was SAE corrected for instance. Those numbers seem at least 25hp too high for just a lid and catback.
03-06-2004, 09:52 PM
#14
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego/Schertz,Texas
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by absolut_speed
Was it corrected for atmospheric conditions, or are those raw numbers? I don't see where it denotes that it was SAE corrected for instance.
03-06-2004, 09:58 PM
#16
Originally Posted by KrazyDan
i know they dynoed in 4th gear. look at it again, it does cross the torque line. maybe its hard to see but the actual copy you can tell
it touches the TQ line, but it doesnt cross it. the HP curve should of crossed it at 5250 and then kept pulling. yours touches the TQ at 5250 and then falls like a brick.
03-06-2004, 10:00 PM
#17
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego/Schertz,Texas
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by jrp
it touches the TQ line, but it doesnt cross it. the HP curve should of crossed it at 5250 and then kept pulling. yours touches the TQ at 5250 and then falls like a brick.
03-06-2004, 10:16 PM
#19
Most people dyno on a Dyno Jet. You dynoed on a Dyno Dynamics. Just like a Mustang Dyno usually shows lower numbers than a Dyno Jet, perhaps a Dyno Dynamics shows higher numbers. Can't compare apples and oranges.
http://www.dyno.com.au/
http://www.dyno.com.au/
03-06-2004, 10:19 PM
#20
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego/Schertz,Texas
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by 2xLS1
Most people dyno on a Dyno Jet. You dynoed on a Dyno Dynamics. Just like a Mustang Dyno usually shows lower numbers than a Dyno Jet, perhaps a Dyno Dynamics shows higher numbers. Can't compare apples and oranges.
http://www.dyno.com.au/
http://www.dyno.com.au/
the dyno jet broke earlier in the morning