New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

SICK CAM for LS Cars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2012, 09:01 AM
  #1  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default SICK CAM for LS Cars

Due to loads of questions about "what cam should I go with" and the extremely popular "polluter" cam, we have designed a camshaft upgrade package that puts down the horsepower and torque numbers for your LS based machine!!! If you are in the market for a new cam, or if you are looking to put a cam in your LS based ride, this is the perfect cam for you. Check out the link below for more details!

98-02 Fbody
http://www.tickperformance.com/tick-...grade-package/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfKhP...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6HKv...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnpDc...eature=related

Last edited by Sales@Tick; 02-23-2012 at 09:16 AM.
Old 02-21-2012, 10:28 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
The Mighty Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Longview,TX & Tricitys,WA
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks pretty good on the graphs!
Old 02-21-2012, 12:48 PM
  #3  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Yes it is a very solid performing cam, we have had guys with more bolt ons that made similar numbers to that of lower performing head/cam cars.
Old 02-21-2012, 03:55 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have been debating this for 3 months now. I just cannot decide between the polluter, street sweeper, or the torquer v2.
Old 02-21-2012, 04:02 PM
  #5  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MikeWS6
I have been debating this for 3 months now. I just cannot decide between the polluter, street sweeper, or the torquer v2.
Cant go wrong with the polluter, makes great numbers, sounds awesome, and has good driveability.
Old 02-21-2012, 04:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chris-Tick
Cant go wrong with the polluter, makes great numbers, sounds awesome, and has good driveability.
Its better on the street vs an ms3 right? My car is not a dd I only drive it a few days a week.
Old 02-21-2012, 08:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
CamaroSS27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Good numbers seems like a big cam, wonder what it would do with some heads?
Old 02-21-2012, 09:09 PM
  #8  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Jonathan@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

We have seen near 500 rwhp with the Polluter along with a set of 215 TFS heads on LS1's. With all of the bolt ons, thinner head gaskets, milled heads along with flycut pistons making over 500 rhwp would be no problem.

The Polluter works we'll in just about any combination using cathedral port style cylinder heads. We later built a 408 for the first car to ever receive the Polluter camshaft. With the Polluter combined with a set of 225 AFR cylinder heads and a FAST 92 that car produced 550 rwhp.

I would consider the Polluter to be a "max effort" cam for a stock bottom end LS1/6/2. It is on the large side in terms of what fits with a safe amount of PTV clearance.

With a good tune the Polluter can be very driveable, however to get the most from this or any camshaft of this size a lower gear ratio than factory will help (higher numerically) and a 3500+ stall converter is a requirement.
Old 02-23-2012, 12:50 AM
  #9  
Staging Lane
 
Petersen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ms4 for sure and no need to flycut if your tight on money. Give up a lilttle lower in torque. But the biggest cam isn't always best it's not a dick measuring contest. Just depends on your plans
Old 02-23-2012, 12:54 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,263
Received 59 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

Bigger is not always better..you can only flow so much..
Old 02-23-2012, 09:05 AM
  #11  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petersen
Ms4 for sure and no need to flycut if your tight on money. Give up a lilttle lower in torque. But the biggest cam isn't always best it's not a dick measuring contest. Just depends on your plans
The "Polluter" cam is the largest ls1 cam you can run without having any PTV clearance. So no need to fly cut the pistons with the polluter cam. Your right though, it does depend on the plans for the car, but generally bigger cams yeld bigger numbers.
Old 02-23-2012, 02:35 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
 
K11PER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds nice
Old 02-23-2012, 02:38 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
Cosmos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris-Tick
The "Polluter" cam is the largest ls1 cam you can run without having any PTV clearance.
So basically the motor wont turn over?

Sorry, had too
Old 02-23-2012, 02:43 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
Cosmos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petersen
Ms4 for sure and no need to flycut if your tight on money. Give up a lilttle lower in torque. But the biggest cam isn't always best it's not a dick measuring contest. Just depends on your plans
But a big cam with CORRECT supporting mods will **** pound a smaller cam all day. You must have proper mods to fully see a big cams potential. I wouldn't go over low 230s with stock heads and compression myself. I notice most people who buy the donkey cams just get them because shops market the peak number they make but dont know you need gears, verter, intake, upped compression and so on to let the cam see its potential.

I knew a guy who had a TRex with stock 3.42s. That thing was a turd.
Old 02-23-2012, 04:08 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,263
Received 59 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

^^Good point.
Old 02-23-2012, 04:21 PM
  #16  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cosmos
So basically the motor wont turn over?

Sorry, had too
Sure it will... that why they make starters!
Old 02-26-2012, 04:29 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
camaroboy14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: spangdahlem/bruch germany
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any 1/4mile times?? That's what I want to know the most
Old 03-02-2012, 03:07 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
 
CoolAid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKrBraNkNvc
(Jump to 1:40 for the fully warmed up lopey magic sound we all love and desire)

Originally Posted by camaroboy14
Any 1/4mile times?? That's what I want to know the most
3,800# race weight, full accessories, stock suspension, LS2 GTO w/ full exhaust (3/4 LTs), and a Circle D 4,300 stall converter, stock 3.46 gears, non-shop ported LS2 intake/TB, 555R DRs on stock 17x8 wheels.

Similar DA example:

Same mods, PRE-cam, +1,741ft DA
-1.69 60ft
-7.82 @ 87MPH 1/8
-12.28 @ 110MPH 1/4

Same mods, AFTER Polluter cam, +2,044ft DA
-1.63 60ft
-7.52 @ 93MPH 1/8
-11.80 @ 115MPH 1/4

Pre cam was consistent 12.3xs @ 108-110. After cam is consistent 11.8xs @ 114-115. Despite being a monster cam for stock cubes/heads/gears, I lost no 60ft or 1/8th performance. Quite the contrary. I gained an exceptional 6MPH @ the 1/8th mile! And the 1/4 time/trap tells the other side of the story on how this cam just doesn't quit. Even when breathing through a garbage LS2 intake. Obviously the converter is a big supporting element to why the cam performs like it does in my car, but just going off the cam gains alone the Polluter delivers. This cam will truly shine in my car with some AI ported 243s, a FAST 102 and some 3.91s. Can't wait.

Tick Performance has a winning bump stick here.

Last edited by CoolAid; 03-02-2012 at 03:18 PM. Reason: clean up
Old 03-03-2012, 09:24 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
camaroboy14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: spangdahlem/bruch germany
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow pretty good times there !! Nice looking GTO too!
Old 03-05-2012, 10:17 AM
  #20  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
stlracing289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would a Yank SS3600 stall work well with this cam?


Quick Reply: SICK CAM for LS Cars



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.