New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

mid tubes vs long tubes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2012, 11:55 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
jpbluebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default mid tubes vs long tubes

I have a 99 firebird formula and it already came with Mac mib tube headers, I was thinking of getting a set of pacesetter long tube headers......do yall think there would be much of a hp gain?
Old 04-30-2012, 12:07 PM
  #2  
777
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

10-15rwhp
Old 04-30-2012, 12:09 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
jpbluebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's what I was thinking.....and I've heard they aren't very easy to install.
Old 04-30-2012, 12:18 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

its worth upgrading imo.
Old 04-30-2012, 12:21 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

you'll gain torque with the long tubes. They should make about the same peak HP. If you keep out of the gas the long tubes should increase your fuel milage.
The Macs are ok if they are in good shape. I ran them years ago. I did find that the long tube Pace setters were easier to install. They did give better clearence in the engine compartment over the Macs.
Old 04-30-2012, 12:59 PM
  #6  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,039
Likes: 0
Received 1,489 Likes on 1,072 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1lejohn
you'll gain torque with the long tubes. They should make about the same peak HP.
Agreed, epecially if it's just a bolt-on car.
Old 05-01-2012, 12:27 AM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
jpbluebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is a bolt on car for now, but I have an ls6 intake, 243 heads, 42lb injectors, and a 2500 stall in the garage ready to be put on. I'm just trying to figure out what cam I want to run. I was thinking the tr224 would be perfect.
Old 05-01-2012, 06:14 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

sell that 2500 stall for something higher.
Old 05-01-2012, 12:50 PM
  #9  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,039
Likes: 0
Received 1,489 Likes on 1,072 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
sell that 2500 stall for something higher.


2500 is about 1000rpm too low for even a stock LS1. If you plan on a cam as well, 3500 would be the absolute minimum IMO.
Old 05-01-2012, 01:59 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
wooddaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alachua, FL
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6


2500 is about 1000rpm too low for even a stock LS1. If you plan on a cam as well, 3500 would be the absolute minimum IMO.
+1, At least a 3600; it will wake the car up. You wont notice anything under 3000
Old 05-01-2012, 05:34 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jpbluebird
It is a bolt on car for now, but I have an ls6 intake, 243 heads, 42lb injectors, and a 2500 stall in the garage ready to be put on. I'm just trying to figure out what cam I want to run. I was thinking the tr224 would be perfect.

It should be a nice build. Like posted above a bigger stall for the track but with a 224 cam you could stay with a near stock one and make a nice DD. It will put down some good dyno #'s esp. with stock gears. I would say in the 400hp range.

A bigger stall, gears ?? and good tires would make it a strip hero. Then the parts breakage begins. LOL
Old 05-01-2012, 09:40 PM
  #12  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,039
Likes: 0
Received 1,489 Likes on 1,072 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1lejohn
It should be a nice build. Like posted above a bigger stall for the track but with a 224 cam you could stay with a near stock one and make a nice DD.
Even for a daily driver I'd want a lot more stall for that cam, or any cam. Stock shift extension isn't even close to ideal for a stock cam, let alone something bigger. Idle tuning will also be more difficult with a stock/stockish stall and a 224 cam.
Old 05-02-2012, 01:05 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
 
T3X_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Agreed ^^^ with the guys above, i noticed a big difference when i installed my Vig 3600 on a bolt on car
Old 05-02-2012, 01:07 PM
  #14  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (8)
 
T3X_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Planning on doing H/C next month



Quick Reply: mid tubes vs long tubes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 AM.