New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Built LS1 performance question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2012, 10:54 AM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ckpitt55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Built LS1 performance question

Hey gents,

Sorry for the newb-ish question, I still have a lot of reading and research to do. I'm eventually looking to do an LSx swap on my E36, and wanted to ask you guys what kind of performance / fuel mileage I could expect from a moderately built LS1/T56. My goal is roughly 450hp n/a, while still being practical and streetable. I've found a motor with the lunati 395 stroker kit / mild cam installed, and was wondering if something like this would be worth pursuing.

If anyone has any better/cheaper recommendations for achieving those goals though, I'm all ears. I still have a lot to learn with these motors. I appreciate your help.

-Chuck
Old 06-28-2012, 11:28 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
TyCZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leander TX
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

with the right rear end gears you can still realistically squeak out low to mid 20's
Old 06-28-2012, 12:20 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Looking to go aluminum or iron block ? What is the stroke on that lunati crank to get the 395ci ?
Old 06-28-2012, 12:24 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ckpitt55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

most likely aluminum for the weight savings. not a huge difference but not insignificant. the stroke on the 395 kit is 4.125": http://www.lunatipower.com/Product.aspx?id=379&gid=187
Old 06-28-2012, 12:56 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
TyCZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leander TX
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

NOT THAT ONE!! that compression is sooooo low your car will be dog down low.. whats your budget?
Old 06-28-2012, 03:03 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
conan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Back in the Burg
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

X2 ^^^
You want the compression around 10.5:1 / 11:1 for a N/A moter. Also a 4.125 stroke crank in a ls1 block is pushing the limits. If the machining isn't perfect =

The iron blocks weigh 100-120 pounds more than the aluminum blocks so if weight is a consern go aluminum.
If the extra weight doesnt bother you I would start with the Iron 6.0L block (lq4 or lq9) and bore it .020 over and stick a 4" stroke rotating assemly in there getting you to 408ci. That with a good head/cam package, intake, and long tubes will get you past your 450hp goal N/A.
Old 06-28-2012, 11:16 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
TyCZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leander TX
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

4.030 is a 408... i have one for sale =] 400 bucks for a fresh block, cam bearings, and an engine stand
Old 06-29-2012, 12:44 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
FNSlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Anderson, SC
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

450 na is easy to get but if gas mileage is a big deal, why not supercharge or turbo it? You can get 450 whp with 30 mpg on a 6 speed
Old 06-29-2012, 10:44 AM
  #9  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Just as an example my 01 Z06 has 450rwhp from a heads/cam 5.7l and I still got 27mpg on my last trip to DFW. Give us a call or send me a PM and I can get you a quote for a similar package as far as heads/cam goes.
Old 06-29-2012, 01:15 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ckpitt55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FNSlow
450 na is easy to get but if gas mileage is a big deal, why not supercharge or turbo it? You can get 450 whp with 30 mpg on a 6 speed
true, power comes easy with f/i but i hate turbos and fitting a supercharger with the required plumbing under my hood becomes an issue (its a bmw 95 e36). i think a centrifugal blower with a custom bracket would be my only option as far as f/i goes, not really a headache i want to deal with on top of everything else related to the swap...fabbing motor mounts, trans mounts, headers, full exhaust, custom driveshaft, splicing harnesses, etc. not something i want to deal with initially anyway.

Originally Posted by JohnJanz@Texas-Speed
Just as an example my 01 Z06 has 450rwhp from a heads/cam 5.7l and I still got 27mpg on my last trip to DFW. Give us a call or send me a PM and I can get you a quote for a similar package as far as heads/cam goes.
I'll have to do that to pick your brain a bit, I'm no where near ready to purchase anything..just want to get my **** together so I have direction and am informed when it does come time to buy.

Originally Posted by TyCZ28
4.030 is a 408... i have one for sale =] 400 bucks for a fresh block, cam bearings, and an engine stand
I'll pm you after work for some more info.

thanks for all the replies, gents. i appreciate it.

Last edited by ckpitt55; 06-29-2012 at 01:26 PM.
Old 06-29-2012, 02:49 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
FNSlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Anderson, SC
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I understand it'd be a lot more work, it's just that gas mileage will drop quick on an n/a build. 450 isn't radical so you could probably still get low 20's cruising.
Old 06-29-2012, 04:10 PM
  #12  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

That is what we are here for. Give me a call and we can line out everything you need, I can even send an email with a quote for it all if needed.
Old 07-01-2012, 01:24 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
BriancWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Garage
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

My cars old setup which went 11.20s on the second shake down pass, and was a ~450rw setup, knocked off 24.86 mpg with 4.10s running the a/c and cruise control in hilly mountainous terrain! These cars can still achieve great fuel economy even when modded.
Old 07-01-2012, 07:22 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
I8UR4RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bama
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

you can always call AES and get the 398. great deal on a fantastic product. It may take a little longer, but consider they are also busy building top fuel engines and stuff as well. texas speed builds awesome motors too. its a win win.
Old 07-02-2012, 02:51 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ckpitt55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BriancWS6
My cars old setup which went 11.20s on the second shake down pass, and was a ~450rw setup, knocked off 24.86 mpg with 4.10s running the a/c and cruise control in hilly mountainous terrain! These cars can still achieve great fuel economy even when modded.
that's what i'm going for. i still plan on dd'ing the car when the weather favors it so maintaining those mpg's is somewhat important to me. i'd probably be running a 3.91 in the rear, not a big difference but might help a bit. how did you like the 4.10?
Old 07-04-2012, 09:36 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
BriancWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Garage
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ckpitt55
that's what i'm going for. i still plan on dd'ing the car when the weather favors it so maintaining those mpg's is somewhat important to me. i'd probably be running a 3.91 in the rear, not a big difference but might help a bit. how did you like the 4.10?
I loved the 4.10s. I installed them when I only had bolt ons, they were nice then too. I've had 4.30s since 08 when I installed the M9, love them as well



Quick Reply: Built LS1 performance question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 PM.