New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FWD LS4 Crank in a 5.3 Truck block?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2012, 08:52 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Keith Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southaven,MS
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default FWD LS4 Crank in a 5.3 Truck block?

My son got a long block last year with LS4 internals in a 5.3 truck block. He has been saving his money up slowly to build it up for his air bagged '77 dually. He is having problems with the LS4 crank. We had a friend machine a spacer for the TCI flywheel but now it seems he has a problem with trying to put a 5.3 truck pulley on the front. I Just read on here that the Ls4 crank is 13mm shorter overall. 3mm in the rear (already solved), and 10mm in the front. It seems the front of the crank .010 larger diameter than the truck pulley. This is my first dealing with the Ls motor and my 18 year old is ready to throw in the towel. Any ideas other than replacing the crank. Keith Thanks.
Old 08-05-2012, 11:36 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
TyCZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leander TX
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Honestly your putting too much effort and thought into it... Just get either an LS1, Lq4, LQ9, lm7 etc. crank thats the right size. i picked one up a few months ago for 40 bucks and paid 20 to have it polished... they are cheap and easy to find.
Old 08-07-2012, 04:08 AM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

It seems at this point the engine is already together and half the equation is solved. Tearing the engine down to replace the crank would be a last resort in my opinion.

I would have the truck balancer machined down 13mm and have the inside opened up to fit the larger snout.

Be very very cautious to get the measurments exactly correct as the balancer is a press fit.

Or....you could possibly use an entire front drive accessory system.
Old 08-07-2012, 04:09 AM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

If you chose to have the truck balancer machined, I suggest spending a few extra bucks on a crank pinning kit. Just for extra insurance.
Old 08-07-2012, 12:23 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
TyCZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leander TX
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
It seems at this point the engine is already together and half the equation is solved. Tearing the engine down to replace the crank would be a last resort in my opinion.

I would have the truck balancer machined down 13mm and have the inside opened up to fit the larger snout.
Read better... 10mm SHORTER.. he needs to make a spacer for that much which is not safe and wont balance out properly...

he already made a spacer for the flex-plate.
Old 08-07-2012, 04:47 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Sorry...

Machine the pulley 10mm and not 13.

No spacer is needed as that would only compound the problem.
Old 08-07-2012, 08:50 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
TyCZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leander TX
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i fail to see how machining 10mm off of the pulley will solve the fact that the LS4 crank is 10mm shorter in the front than it needs to be...

if the crank is 10mm shorter and he machines 10mm off the pulley now hes 20mm short...

or am i missing some sort of LSx voodoo here
Old 08-07-2012, 09:38 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I think both of us are over thinking it.

The more I think about it, as long as the flange the pulley sits against (timing gear) is in the same location, the pulley should fit just fine, there will just be an extra 10mm between the bolt surface of the pulley and the end of the crank. I honestly don't see this being a problem as long as there is enough surface area for the pulley to have enough press fit to stay put.
Old 08-16-2012, 08:43 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Keith Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southaven,MS
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies. We got the pulley on with the installation tool that he bought. We got the engine and trans dropped in Friday night. We are now trying to start with his Fast EZ EFI Master Kit. We finally got the fuel rails on the Fast RT intake just to realize we have to take them back off to take the intake apart to drill for the map sensor. He dishearted some, but he will try to find out some answers tomorrow at work at Comp Cams. He will have to talk to the fast engineers to try to figure it out. Lots of wires!!!! Keith
Old 08-16-2012, 08:57 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
 
TyCZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leander TX
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Could have gone Carb's and used the MSD box to control the ignition. would have only been a few wires and gave it the LS power and the old school look.
Old 08-20-2012, 03:21 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

If they already have the parts to go FI, go for it. Tuning is a lot of fun and in the end yields better power band than a carb. At least overall. Learning FI also allows you to make some money back to help pay for that bad *** Fast system.

Last edited by codyvette; 08-20-2012 at 03:22 PM. Reason: Spell dummy



Quick Reply: FWD LS4 Crank in a 5.3 Truck block?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.